Suppr超能文献

在一种洞巢同种巢寄生鸟类中,后代性别分配存在偏向性的证据有限。

Limited evidence of biased offspring sex allocation in a cavity-nesting conspecific brood parasite.

作者信息

Wells Caitlin P, Lyon Bruce E, Thow Caroline M, Stair Tez, Jones Melissa, Hinton Mitch, Eadie John M

机构信息

Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology; Colorado State University, 901 Amy Van Dyken Way, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology; University of California, 1088 Academic Surge, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

出版信息

Behav Ecol. 2024 Mar 29;35(3):arae024. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arae024. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.

Abstract

Sex allocation theory predicts that mothers should bias investment in offspring toward the sex that yields higher fitness returns; one such bias may be a skewed offspring sex ratio. Sex allocation is well-studied in birds with cooperative breeding systems, with theory on local resource enhancement and production of helpers at the nest, but little theoretical or empirical work has focused on birds with brood parasitic breeding systems. Wood ducks () are a conspecific brood parasite, and rates of parasitism appear to increase with density. Because female wood ducks show high natal philopatry and nest sites are often limiting, local resource competition (LRC) theory predicts that females should overproduce male offspring-the dispersing sex-when competition (density) is high. However, the unique features of conspecific brood parasitism generate alternative predictions from other sex allocation theory, which we develop and test here. We experimentally manipulated nesting density of female wood ducks in 4 populations from 2013 to 2016, and analyzed the resulting sex allocation of >2000 ducklings. In contrast to predictions we did not find overproduction of male offspring by females in high-density populations, females in better condition, or parasitic females; modest support for LRC was found in overproduction of only female parasitic offspring with higher nest box availability. The lack of evidence for sex ratio biases, as expected for LRC and some aspects of brood parasitism, could reflect conflicting selection pressures from nest competition and brood parasitism, or that mechanisms of adaptive sex ratio bias are not possible.

摘要

性分配理论预测,母亲应该将对后代的投资偏向于能产生更高适应性回报的性别;这种偏向可能表现为后代性别比例失衡。在具有合作繁殖系统的鸟类中,性分配已得到充分研究,相关理论涉及本地资源增强和巢中帮手的产生,但很少有理论或实证研究关注具有巢寄生繁殖系统的鸟类。林鸳鸯()是同种巢寄生鸟类,寄生率似乎随密度增加而上升。由于雌性林鸳鸯表现出较高的出生地留居率,且巢址往往有限,本地资源竞争(LRC)理论预测,当竞争(密度)较高时,雌性应过度繁殖雄性后代——即扩散性别的后代。然而,同种巢寄生的独特特征产生了与其他性分配理论不同的预测,我们在此进行了拓展并加以检验。我们在2013年至2016年期间对4个种群的雌性林鸳鸯筑巢密度进行了实验性操控,并分析了由此产生的2000多只雏鸭的性分配情况。与预测相反,我们并未发现高密度种群中的雌性、状况较好的雌性或寄生雌性过度繁殖雄性后代;仅在巢箱可用性较高时,寄生雌性后代过度繁殖雌性这一情况中,对LRC有适度支持。正如LRC和巢寄生的某些方面所预期的那样,缺乏性别比例偏向的证据可能反映了巢竞争和巢寄生相互冲突的选择压力,或者是适应性性别比例偏向的机制不存在。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d40/11453106/168bd60d4404/arae024_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验