Suppr超能文献

乙状结肠前联合入路:文献综述。

Combined presigmoid approach: A literature review.

作者信息

Albairmani Sama S, Muthana Ahmed, Mohammed Tabarek F, Al-Zaidy Mahmood F, Atallah Oday, Aljuboori Ahmed, Aljuboori Zaid, Andaluz Norberto, Hoz Samer S

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Al-Iraqia University, Baghdad, Iraq.

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

出版信息

Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Sep 20;15:342. doi: 10.25259/SNI_594_2024. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The presigmoid approach represents the standard route to reach the petrous area anterior to the sigmoid sinus. Several lateral skull base approaches have been integrated into this approach for the purpose of widening the window, leading to variable combined approaches and variable terminology. Herein, the authors conducted a systematic review of the literature to simplify understanding of the potential combination of different approaches and their complications.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to include studies describing modifications of the presigmoid approach.

RESULTS

We included 27 studies comprising 545 patients. Five combination types applied to the presigmoid approach were identified: Anterior petrosal (Kawase's) approach (Type-1), Supra-tentorial approach (Type-2), Infratemporal fossa approach (Type-3), retrosigmoid approach (Type-4), and Far-lateral suboccipital approach (Type-5). Type-1 combined approach was the commonest type ( = 204, 37.5%), followed by type-2 ( = 197, 36%), type-4 ( = 54, 9.9%), type-5 ( = 51, 9.4%), and type-3 ( = 39, 7.2%). Meningioma was the typical target lesion in all types except type 3, where it is solely used for paraganglioma. The petroclival region was the prevalent access location in all the types of combined presigmoid approaches (type-1, 92%; type-2, 95%; type-3, 100%; type-4, 59%; and type-5, 64%). The intraoperative lateral patient position was dominantly utilized in type-1, type-3, and type-5 approaches (65%, 100%, and 100%, respectively), while park-bench was the most common position in type-2 (36%) and type-4 (100%) approaches. Overall, all types exhibited good outcomes in the form of gross total resection of the lesion and the absence of surgical complications in the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Presigmoid approaches are becoming increasingly complex with the application and integration of the lateral skull base approaches, resulting in broadening the surgical field and easy access to the targeted lesions. The importance of designing a comprehensive nomenclature of the combined presigmoid approaches may add distinctive contributions to the growing knowledge of neurosurgery.

摘要

背景

乙状窦前入路是到达乙状窦前方岩骨区域的标准路径。为了扩大手术视野,多种侧颅底入路已被整合到该入路中,导致出现了多种联合入路及不同的术语。在此,作者对文献进行了系统回顾,以简化对不同入路潜在组合及其并发症的理解。

方法

按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南,检索了PubMed、EMBASE和Web of Science数据库,纳入描述乙状窦前入路改良的研究。

结果

我们纳入了27项研究,共545例患者。确定了应用于乙状窦前入路的5种联合类型:岩前(Kawase)入路(1型)、幕上入路(2型)、颞下窝入路(3型)、乙状窦后入路(4型)和远外侧枕下入路(5型)。1型联合入路是最常见的类型(n = 204,37.5%),其次是2型(n = 197,36%)、4型(n = 54,9.9%)、5型(n = 51,9.4%)和3型(n = 39,7.2%)。除3型仅用于副神经节瘤外,所有类型的典型目标病变均为脑膜瘤。在所有类型的乙状窦前联合入路中,岩斜区都是主要的手术区域(1型为92%;2型为95%;3型为100%;4型为59%;5型为64%)。1型、3型和5型入路术中主要采用患者侧卧位(分别为65%、100%和100%),而2型(36%)和4型(100%)入路最常用的是公园长椅位。总体而言,所有类型在病变全切及随访中无手术并发症方面均显示出良好的结果。

结论

随着侧颅底入路的应用和整合,乙状窦前入路变得越来越复杂,从而扩大了手术视野并便于接近目标病变。设计一套全面的乙状窦前联合入路命名法对于神经外科知识的不断增长可能会有独特的贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2f/11450886/83faa1891f79/SNI-15-342-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验