Alrasheed Abdulrahim Saleh, Alqadhibi Mohammed Abdullah, Khoja Rammaz Hussam, Alayyaf Abdulaziz Saad, Alhumoudi Duaa Saleh, Aldawlan Mubarak Ibrahim, Alghanmi Bedoor Obidallah, Almutairi Fahad Salman, Bin-Mahfooz Mohammed Ali, Altalhi Lina Abdulrahim, Aldanyowi Saud Nayef, Aleid Abdulsalam Mohammed, Alessa Awn Abdulmohsen
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, AlAhsa, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.
Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Sep 13;15:327. doi: 10.25259/SNI_502_2024. eCollection 2024.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a significant global health burden, often leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Mounting evidence underscores the intricate involvement of dysregulated immune responses in TBI pathophysiology, highlighting the potential for immunomodulatory interventions to mitigate secondary injury cascades and enhance patient outcomes. Despite advancements in treatment modalities, optimizing therapeutic strategies remains a critical challenge in TBI management. To address this gap, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to rigorously evaluate the efficacy and safety of emerging immunomodulatory therapies in the context of TBI.
We searched electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and CENTRAL for relevant studies investigating the efficacy of immunomodulatory therapies in TBI that were meticulously selected for inclusion. Two independent reviewers meticulously performed data extraction and quality assessment, adhering to predefined criteria. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting clinically relevant outcomes, such as mortality rates, the Glasgow coma scale, and adverse events, were meticulously scrutinized. Meta-analysis techniques were employed to assess treatment effects across studies quantitatively and analyzed using the Review Manager software (version 5.2).
Fourteen studies ( = 1 observational and = 13 RCTs) were included in our study. Meta-analysis showed no significant overall mortality difference, but erythropoietin (EPO) significantly reduced mortality (odds ratio = 0.49; 95% confidence interval: 0.31-0.78, = 0.002). The adverse event meta-analysis revealed no significant differences.
Immunomodulatory therapies did not significantly affect overall mortality, but EPO demonstrated promising results. Adverse events did not significantly differ from controls. Further research is warranted to refine TBI treatment protocols.
创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是一项重大的全球健康负担,常常导致严重的发病率和死亡率。越来越多的证据强调免疫反应失调在TBI病理生理学中的复杂参与,凸显了免疫调节干预减轻继发性损伤级联反应并改善患者预后的潜力。尽管治疗方式有所进步,但优化治疗策略仍是TBI管理中的一项关键挑战。为填补这一空白,本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在严格评估新型免疫调节疗法在TBI背景下的疗效和安全性。
我们检索了电子数据库,如PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和CENTRAL,以查找有关免疫调节疗法在TBI中疗效的相关研究,并精心挑选纳入研究。两名独立评审员严格按照预定义标准进行数据提取和质量评估。对报告临床相关结局(如死亡率、格拉斯哥昏迷量表和不良事件)的随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究均进行了严格审查。采用荟萃分析技术对各研究的治疗效果进行定量评估,并使用Review Manager软件(版本5.2)进行分析。
我们的研究纳入了14项研究(1项观察性研究和13项RCT)。荟萃分析显示总体死亡率无显著差异,但促红细胞生成素(EPO)显著降低了死亡率(优势比=0.49;95%置信区间:0.31-0.78,P=0.002)。不良事件荟萃分析未显示显著差异。
免疫调节疗法对总体死亡率无显著影响,但EPO显示出有前景的结果。不良事件与对照组无显著差异。有必要进行进一步研究以完善TBI治疗方案。