Martin-Gill Christian, Patterson P Daniel, Richards Christopher T, Misra Anjali J, Potts Benjamin T, Cash Rebecca E
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Nov 6:1-10. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2412299.
Evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) are widely recognized as valuable tools to aggregate and translate scientific knowledge into clinical care. High-quality EBGs can also serve as important components of dissemination and implementation efforts focused on educating emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians about current evidence-based prehospital clinical care practices and operations. We aimed to perform the third biennial systematic review of prehospital EBGs to identify and assess the quality of prehospital EBGs published since 2021.
We systematically searched Ovid Medline and EMBASE from January 1, 2021, to June 6, 2023, for publications relevant to prehospital care, based on an organized review of the literature, and focused on providing recommendations for clinical care or operations. Included guidelines were appraised using the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) criteria for high-quality guidelines and scored using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Tool.
We identified 33 new guidelines addressing clinical and operational topics of EMS medicine. The most addressed EMS core content areas were time-life critical conditions ( = 17, 51.5%), special clinical considerations ( = 15, 45%), and injury ( = 12, 36%). Seven (21%) guidelines included all elements of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) criteria for high-quality guidelines, including the full reporting of a systematic review of the evidence. Guideline appraisals by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool demonstrated modest compliance to reporting recommendations and similar overall quality compared to previously identified guidelines (mean overall domain score 67%, SD 12%), with Domain 5 ("Applicability") scoring the lowest of the six AGREE II domains (mean score of 53%, SD 13%).
This updated systematic review identified and appraised recent guidelines addressing prehospital care and identifies important targets for education of EMS personnel. Continued opportunities exist for prehospital guideline developers to include comprehensive evidence-based reporting into guideline development to facilitate widespread implementation of high-quality EBGs in EMS systems and incorporate the best available scientific evidence into initial education and continued competency activities.
循证指南(EBGs)被广泛认为是将科学知识汇总并转化为临床护理的宝贵工具。高质量的循证指南还可作为传播和实施工作的重要组成部分,旨在教育紧急医疗服务(EMS)临床医生了解当前基于证据的院前临床护理实践和操作。我们旨在对院前循证指南进行第三次两年期系统评价,以识别和评估2021年以来发表的院前循证指南的质量。
我们基于文献的系统回顾,于2021年1月1日至2023年6月6日在Ovid Medline和EMBASE中系统检索与院前护理相关的出版物,并侧重于提供临床护理或操作的建议。纳入的指南使用美国国家医学院(NAM)高质量指南标准进行评估,并使用《研究与评价指南评估》(AGREE)II工具进行评分。
我们确定了33项涉及EMS医学临床和操作主题的新指南。最常涉及的EMS核心内容领域是时间-生命关键状况(17项,51.5%)、特殊临床考虑因素(15项,45%)和损伤(12项,36%)。七项(21%)指南包括了美国国家医学院(NAM)高质量指南标准的所有要素,包括对证据的系统评价的完整报告。《研究与评价指南评估》(AGREE)II工具对指南的评估表明,与之前确定的指南相比,在报告建议方面的符合度一般,总体质量相似(平均总体领域得分67%,标准差12%),其中第5个领域(“适用性”)在AGREE II的六个领域中得分最低(平均得分53%,标准差13%)。
本次更新的系统评价识别并评估了近期涉及院前护理的指南,并确定了EMS人员教育的重要目标。院前指南制定者仍有机会将全面的循证报告纳入指南制定,以促进高质量循证指南在EMS系统中的广泛实施,并将最佳可得科学证据纳入初始教育和持续能力活动中。