Røe Cecilie, Gutenbrunner Christoph, Bökel Andrea, Kirkevold Marit, Nugraha Boya, Andelic Nada, Lu Juan, Bautz-Holter Erik, Perrin Paul B, Anke Audny, Jahnsen Reidun, Månum Grethe, Howe Emilie, Kildal Bragstad Line, Soberg Helene L
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Oslo, Oslo, Norway -
Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway -
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Dec;60(6):1070-1077. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08494-6. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
The lack of standardized reporting for crucial organizational factors in rehabilitation poses a significant barrier to understanding their impact on patient outcomes in clinical trials and meta-analyses.
Based on the categories in the International Classification of Service Organization in Rehabilitation (ICSO-R 2.0), we aimed to develop reporting standards specifically for organizational factors in clinical trials.
A comprehensive two-step process was conducted. In Step 1, important categories were identified. The identification was based on previous results from a Delphi survey with international stakeholder participation, two systematic literature reviews and results from focus groups with users in Germany, Indonesia and Norway. Step 2 involved the necessary reduction of categories and the proposal of reporting specifications, achieved through two voting rounds among key researchers, stakeholders and users.
The suggested minimum reporting set comprises Context and Setting as well as Quality assurance and management. The Context and Setting is proposed to include whether the intervention is delivered by Hospital, Community or Other service providers. The Mode of delivery is proposed to be specified as Inpatient, Outpatient, In-home, or Tele-rehabilitation. Furthermore, the Level of specialization (Primary/Secondary) and the Phase of service delivery Acute, Subacute or Long-term rehabilitation services should be reported. The Quality assurance and management should be reported as Yes or No, with the option Yes requiring description of the quality assurance applied in the methods section.
This study proposed a compulsory and standardized reporting of organizational factors in clinical trials to facilitate the generation of scientific evidence regarding effective service provision and delivery in rehabilitation medicine. Authors are encouraged to consider the proposed reporting set to testing, criticism, and modification to enhance its applicability and robustness.
康复中关键组织因素缺乏标准化报告,这对在临床试验和荟萃分析中理解其对患者结局的影响构成了重大障碍。
基于《国际康复服务组织分类》(ICSO-R 2.0)中的类别,我们旨在制定专门针对临床试验中组织因素的报告标准。
进行了一个全面的两步流程。第一步,确定重要类别。该确定基于之前有国际利益相关者参与的德尔菲调查结果、两项系统文献综述以及德国、印度尼西亚和挪威用户焦点小组的结果。第二步涉及对类别进行必要的精简并提出报告规范,这通过关键研究人员、利益相关者和用户之间的两轮投票实现。
建议的最低报告集包括背景与环境以及质量保证与管理。建议背景与环境包括干预是由医院、社区还是其他服务提供者提供。建议将提供方式具体指定为住院、门诊、居家或远程康复。此外,应报告专业化水平(初级/二级)以及服务提供阶段(急性、亚急性或长期康复服务)。质量保证与管理应报告为是或否,选择“是”时需要在方法部分描述所应用的质量保证。
本研究提出了临床试验中组织因素的强制性和标准化报告,以促进生成关于康复医学中有效服务提供和交付的科学证据。鼓励作者考虑所建议的报告集,以便进行测试、批评和修改,以提高其适用性和稳健性。