Barnowska Ewelina Julia, Fastenau Anil, Penna Srilekha, Bonkass Ann-Kristin, Stuetzle Sophie, Janssen Ricky
Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Global Health, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Oct 7;3(10):e0000629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000629. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Delays in diagnosis and detection of skin neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) pose obstacles to prompt treatment, which is crucial in preventing disability. Recent developments in digital health have given rise to approaches that could increase access to diagnosis in resource-poor areas affected by skin NTDs. This scoping review provides an overview of current digital health approaches that aim to aid in the diagnosis of skin NTDs and provides an insight into the diverse functionalities of current digital health tools, their feasibility, usability, and the current gaps in research around these digital health approaches. This scoping review included a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, EMBASE and SCOPUS, following the PRISMA guidelines. Eleven studies were included in the review and were analysed using a descriptive thematic approach. Most digital tools were found to be mobile-phone based, such as mobile Health (mHealth) apps, store-and-forward tele-dermatology, and Short Messaging Service (SMS) text-messaging. Other digital approaches were based on computer software, such as tele-dermatopathology, computer-based telemedicine, and real-time tele-dermatology. Digital health tools commonly facilitated provider-provider interactions, which helped support diagnoses of skin NTDs at the community level. Articles which focused on end-user user experience reported that users appreciated the usefulness and convenience of these digital tools. However, the results emphasized the existing lack of data regarding the diagnostic precision of these tools, and highlighted various hurdles to their effective implementation, including insufficient infrastructure, data security issues and low adherence to the routine use of digital health tools. Digital health tools can help ascertain diagnosis of skin NTDs through remote review or consultations with patients, and support health providers in the diagnostic process. However, further research is required to address the data security issues associated with digital health tools. Developers should consider adapting digital health tools to diverse socio-cultural and technical environments, where skin NTDs are endemic. Researchers are encouraged to assess the diagnostic accuracy of digital health tools and conduct further qualitative studies to inform end-user experience. Overall, future studies should consider expanding the geographical and disease scope of research on digital health tools which aid the diagnosis of skin NTDs.
皮肤被忽视热带病(NTDs)的诊断和检测延迟给及时治疗带来了障碍,而及时治疗对于预防残疾至关重要。数字健康领域的最新进展催生了一些方法,这些方法可以增加在受皮肤NTDs影响的资源匮乏地区获得诊断的机会。本范围综述概述了当前旨在辅助皮肤NTDs诊断的数字健康方法,并深入了解了当前数字健康工具的各种功能、其可行性、可用性以及围绕这些数字健康方法的当前研究空白。本范围综述按照PRISMA指南,在PubMed、EMBASE和SCOPUS上进行了全面的文献检索。该综述纳入了11项研究,并采用描述性主题方法进行分析。发现大多数数字工具基于手机,如移动健康(mHealth)应用程序、存储转发远程皮肤病学和短消息服务(SMS)短信。其他数字方法基于计算机软件,如远程皮肤病理学、基于计算机的远程医疗和实时远程皮肤病学。数字健康工具通常促进了提供者与提供者之间的互动,这有助于在社区层面支持皮肤NTDs的诊断。关注最终用户体验的文章报告称,用户赞赏这些数字工具的有用性和便利性。然而,结果强调了目前缺乏关于这些工具诊断精度的数据,并突出了其有效实施的各种障碍,包括基础设施不足、数据安全问题以及对数字健康工具常规使用的依从性低。数字健康工具可以通过远程检查或与患者协商来帮助确定皮肤NTDs的诊断,并在诊断过程中支持医疗服务提供者。然而,需要进一步研究来解决与数字健康工具相关的数据安全问题。开发者应考虑使数字健康工具适应皮肤NTDs流行的不同社会文化和技术环境。鼓励研究人员评估数字健康工具的诊断准确性,并进行进一步的定性研究以了解最终用户体验。总体而言,未来的研究应考虑扩大对辅助皮肤NTDs诊断的数字健康工具的研究地理和疾病范围。