Suppr超能文献

使用改进的可开发性分类系统(rDCS)指导口服制剂的设计。

Using the refined Developability Classification System (rDCS) to guide the design of oral formulations.

作者信息

Beran Kristian, Hermans Eline, Holm René, Sepassi Kia, Dressman Jennifer

机构信息

Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Pharmaceutical & Material Sciences, Beerse, Belgium.

Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Pharmaceutical & Material Sciences, Beerse, Belgium.

出版信息

J Pharm Sci. 2024 Dec;113(12):3497-3517. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2024.09.022. Epub 2024 Oct 5.

Abstract

The refined Developability Classification System (rDCS) provides a comprehensive animal-free approach for assessing biopharmaceutical risks associated with developing oral formulations. This work demonstrates practical application of a recently advanced rDCS framework guiding formulation design for six diverse active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and compares rDCS classifications with those of the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS). While the BCS assigns five of the APIs to class II/IV, indicating potentially unfavorable biopharmaceutical attributes, the rDCS provides a more nuanced risk assessment. Both BCS and rDCS assign acetaminophen to class I at therapeutic doses. Voriconazole and lemborexant (both BCS II) are classified in rDCS class I at therapeutic doses, indicating suitability for development as conventional oral formulations. Fedratinib is classified as BCS IV but the rDCS indicates a stratified risk (class I, IIa or IIb), depending on the relevance of supersaturation/precipitation in vivo. Voxelotor and istradefylline (both BCS II) belong to rDCS class IIb, requiring solubility enhancement to achieve adequate oral bioavailability. Comparing the rDCS analysis with literature on development and pharmacokinetics demonstrates that the rDCS reliably supports oral formulation design over a wide range of API characteristics, thus providing a strong foundation for guiding development.

摘要

改进的可开发性分类系统(rDCS)提供了一种全面的无动物方法,用于评估与口服制剂开发相关的生物制药风险。这项工作展示了最近先进的rDCS框架在指导六种不同活性药物成分(API)的制剂设计中的实际应用,并将rDCS分类与生物药剂学分类系统(BCS)的分类进行了比较。虽然BCS将其中五种API归类为II/IV类,表明可能具有不利的生物药剂学属性,但rDCS提供了更细致入微的风险评估。在治疗剂量下,BCS和rDCS都将对乙酰氨基酚归类为I类。伏立康唑和伦博瑞生(均为BCS II类)在治疗剂量下被归类为rDCS I类,表明适合作为传统口服制剂进行开发。非达替尼被归类为BCS IV类,但rDCS根据体内过饱和/沉淀的相关性表明存在分层风险(I类、IIa类或IIb类)。伏罗妥珠单抗和异丁司特(均为BCS II类)属于rDCS IIb类,需要提高溶解度以实现足够的口服生物利用度。将rDCS分析与关于开发和药代动力学的文献进行比较表明,rDCS在广泛的API特性范围内可靠地支持口服制剂设计,从而为指导开发提供了坚实的基础。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验