经皮网状容器成形术与经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗伴有上位终板损伤的骨质疏松性压缩骨折的回顾性研究
Percutaneous Mesh-Container-Plasty versus Percutaneous Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Compression Fractures with Up-Endplate Injury: A Retrospective Study.
作者信息
Sun Haifu, Sun Zhiyong, Tang Wenxiang, Wang Chengyue, Wang Jingjie, Li Yonggang, Wang Yimeng
机构信息
Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China; Department of Orthopaedics, Xinjiang Kezhou People's Hospital, Kizilsu Kirgiz Autonomous Prefecture, Xinjiang, China.
出版信息
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jan;193:1028-1035. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.142. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
BACKGROUND
Percutaneous mesh-container-plasty (PMCP), a modified traditional percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) technique, is increasingly being used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with up-endplate injury. This retrospective study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological results of PKP and PMCP for the treatment of this disease.
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with osteoporotic compression fractures and upper endplate injuries treated at our hospital between January 2019 and December 2021. A total of 192 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled. Of these, 103 underwent PKP and 89 underwent PMCP. Key outcome measures included surgical safety, clinical efficacy, and radiological results.
RESULTS
Both the PKP and PMCP groups showed significant improvements in visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores postoperatively. Additionally, anterior vertebral body height ratio and Cobb's angle improved in both groups, though no statistically significant difference was observed between them. The hospital stay duration was similar between the 2 cohorts. Notably, the PMCP group required a larger volume of bone cement injection yet exhibited a significantly lower incidence of cement leakage and adjacent vertebral fractures (9/89 and 2/89, respectively) compared to the PKP group (24/103 and 11/103, respectively) (P < 0.05). Moreover, the PMCP group had shorter operation times (34.64 ± 9.88 minutes) and reduced fluoroscopy frequency (35.43 ± 5.46 instances) compared to the PKP group (27.23 ± 8.54 minutes and 23.87 ± 5.59 instances, respectively) (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
PMCP provided superior clinical outcomes for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures with upper endplate injuries. It was associated with reduced operation and fluoroscopy times, as well as lower risks of adjacent vertebral fractures and cement leakage, compared to PKP.
背景
经皮网袋成形术(PMCP)是一种改良的传统经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)技术,越来越多地用于治疗伴有上位终板损伤的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折。本回顾性研究旨在比较PKP和PMCP治疗该疾病的临床和影像学结果。
方法
我们回顾性分析了2019年1月至2021年12月在我院接受治疗的骨质疏松性压缩骨折伴上位终板损伤患者的病历。共有192例符合纳入和排除标准的患者入组。其中,103例行PKP,89例行PMCP。主要观察指标包括手术安全性、临床疗效和影像学结果。
结果
PKP组和PMCP组术后视觉模拟评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数评分均有显著改善。此外,两组的椎体前缘高度比和Cobb角均有所改善,但两组之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。两组的住院时间相似。值得注意的是,与PKP组(分别为24/103和11/103)相比,PMCP组需要注入更大体积的骨水泥,但骨水泥渗漏和相邻椎体骨折的发生率显著更低(分别为9/89和2/89)(P<0.05)。此外,与PKP组(分别为27.23±8.54分钟和23.87±5.59次)相比,PMCP组的手术时间更短(34.64±9.88分钟),透视频率更低(35.43±5.46次)(P<0.05)。
结论
PMCP在治疗伴有上位终板损伤的骨质疏松性压缩骨折方面提供了更好的临床结果。与PKP相比,它具有缩短手术和透视时间以及降低相邻椎体骨折和骨水泥渗漏风险的优势。