• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Do not conflate debates on regulating therapeutic use of psychotropic substances with those on the legalization of their non-therapeutic use.

作者信息

Zullino Daniele

机构信息

Service d'addictologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Addiction. 2025 Feb;120(2):211-212. doi: 10.1111/add.16667. Epub 2024 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1111/add.16667
PMID:39374931
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11707319/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Do not conflate debates on regulating therapeutic use of psychotropic substances with those on the legalization of their non-therapeutic use.不要将关于精神活性物质治疗用途监管的辩论与关于这些物质非治疗用途合法化的辩论混为一谈。
Addiction. 2025 Feb;120(2):211-212. doi: 10.1111/add.16667. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
2
Changes in alcohol and cigarette consumption in response to medical and recreational cannabis legalization: Evidence from U.S. state tax receipt data.医疗和娱乐用大麻合法化对酒精和香烟消费的影响变化：来自美国州税收收据数据的证据。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Jan;75:102585. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.10.011. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
3
[Impact of the legalization of recreational cannabis on the risk of psychosis: A systematic review of the literature].[娱乐用大麻合法化对精神病风险的影响：文献系统综述]
Encephale. 2025 Apr;51(2):186-201. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
4
Public perceptions of arguments supporting and opposing recreational marijuana legalization.公众对支持和反对休闲大麻合法化的论据的看法。
Prev Med. 2017 Jun;99:80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
5
[Comparative Harm/Benefit Analysis of Various Psychotropic Substances from the Perspective of German Drug Users and Addiction Medicine Experts - A Contribution to Psychoeducation of Substance-Addicted Individuals and Restriction/Legalization Debates].[从德国吸毒者和成瘾医学专家视角看各类精神药物的危害/益处比较分析——对药物成瘾个体的心理教育及限制/合法化辩论的贡献]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2025 Jan;93(1-02):19-35. doi: 10.1055/a-1971-9558. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
6
Legalization as more effective control? Parallels between the end of alcohol prohibition (1927) and the legalization of cannabis (2018) in Ontario, Canada.合法化是更有效的管控手段？加拿大安大略省酒精禁令的终结（1927年）与大麻合法化（2018年）的相似之处。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Nov;97:103367. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103367. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
7
Differences between users' and addiction medicine experts' harm and benefit assessments of licit and illicit psychoactive drugs: Input for psychoeducation and legalization/restriction debates.使用者与成瘾医学专家对合法及非法精神活性药物的危害和益处评估的差异：为心理教育及合法化/限制辩论提供参考
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 16;13:1041762. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1041762. eCollection 2022.
8
How psychedelics legalization debates could differ from cannabis.迷幻药合法化辩论与大麻合法化辩论会有何不同。
Addiction. 2025 Feb;120(2):209-210. doi: 10.1111/add.16644. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
9
Collisions and cannabis: Measuring the effect of recreational marijuana legalization on traffic crashes in Washington State.碰撞与大麻：评估华盛顿州娱乐大麻合法化对交通事故的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(7):527-535. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2220853. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
10
Changes in California cannabis exposures following recreational legalization and the COVID-19 pandemic.加利福尼亚州娱乐用大麻合法化和 COVID-19 大流行后大麻暴露情况的变化。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2022 May;60(5):632-638. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2021.2006212. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Crafting effective regulatory policies for psychedelics: What can be learned from the case of cannabis?制定有效的迷幻剂监管政策：从大麻案例中能学到什么？
Addiction. 2025 Feb;120(2):201-206. doi: 10.1111/add.16575. Epub 2024 Jun 6.