Suppr超能文献

[娱乐用大麻合法化对精神病风险的影响:文献系统综述]

[Impact of the legalization of recreational cannabis on the risk of psychosis: A systematic review of the literature].

作者信息

Billion Zélie, Hein Matthieu

机构信息

Service de psychiatrie, Université Libre de Bruxelles, ULB, CHU Brugmann, Bruxelles, Belgique.

Service de psychiatrie et laboratoire du sommeil, Université libre de Bruxelles, ULB, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgique; Laboratoire de psychologie médicale et addictologie (ULB312), Université Libre de Bruxelles, ULB, Bruxelles, Belgique.

出版信息

Encephale. 2025 Apr;51(2):186-201. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 Sep 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cannabis is the most consumed illicit substance in Europe. Although its sale and use remain generally prohibited, European public policies have evolved in recent years by legalizing cannabis for medical use and considering its legalization for recreational use. However, in the literature there are arguments in favor of a particular relationship between cannabis consumption and the development of psychotic symptoms. Thus, since cannabis consumption tends to increase with legalization, the aim of this review was to investigate the impact of the legalization of cannabis for recreational use on the risk of psychosis in regions of the world already concerned.

METHOD

A systematic review of the literature was carried out in April 2024 in the PubMed-Medline database according to PRISMA criteria. The sequence of keywords used was as follows: ("Cannabis" [Mesh] or cannabis) AND (("Psychotic Disorders" [Mesh] or Psychotic Disorders) or ("Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders" [Mesh]) or ("Schizophrenia" [Mesh] or Schizophrenia)) AND legal use. The inclusion criteria applied for the selection of articles in this systematic review were: (1) any article investigating the potential impact of the legalization of cannabis for recreational use on the risk of psychosis (any type of psychosis diagnosed according to ICD-9, ICD-10, DSM-4 or DSM-5) by the intermediary of epidemiological (incidence or prevalence) and/or clinical (ambulatory consultations, emergency visits or hospitalizations) criteria, (2) any type of study (cross-sectional, longitudinal, prospective, retrospective, interventional and experimental) with a methodology including a temporal and/or geographic comparison of the risk of psychosis associated with the legalization of cannabis for recreational use with the exception of literature reviews and clinical cases descriptions, (3) absence of limitation for the age of the populations studied and for the date of publication, and (4) articles written in English or French. After evaluation by the two authors of the 160 articles identified, seven studies investigating the impact of the legalization of cannabis for recreational use on the risk of psychosis were included in this systematic literature review.

RESULTS

Four of the studies showed no increase in the use of health services for psychosis following the legalization of cannabis for recreational use whereas three other studies highlighted a negative impact of the legalization of cannabis for recreational use on the risk of psychosis. All of these studies were carried out in North America and were characterized by a low level of scientific evidence.

CONCLUSION

Given the complexity of assessing the impact of the legalization of cannabis for recreational use on the risk of psychosis, additional investigations through studies of better scientific quality are essential. However, based on the data already available, there is some evidence that there is a potential negative impact on mental health due to the legalization of cannabis for recreational use. In this context, in the event of legalization of cannabis for recreational use it seems essential to recommend lower risk use of cannabis (limit the frequency of use, delay the age of first consumption, control the THC content of products and promote prevention/education). Finally, in order to enable dynamic evolution of public health strategies the establishment of continued monitoring is essential as cannabis legalization evolves.

摘要

引言

大麻是欧洲消费最多的非法物质。尽管其销售和使用总体上仍被禁止,但近年来欧洲的公共政策有所演变,将大麻用于医疗用途合法化,并考虑将其用于娱乐用途合法化。然而,文献中有观点支持大麻消费与精神症状发展之间存在特定关系。因此,鉴于大麻消费往往会随着合法化而增加,本综述的目的是调查在世界上已经实施大麻娱乐用途合法化的地区,这种合法化对精神病风险的影响。

方法

2024年4月,根据PRISMA标准在PubMed-Medline数据库中对文献进行了系统综述。使用的关键词顺序如下:(“大麻”[医学主题词]或cannabis)AND((“精神障碍”[医学主题词]或Psychotic Disorders)或(“精神分裂症谱系及其他精神障碍”[医学主题词])或(“精神分裂症”[医学主题词]或Schizophrenia))AND合法使用。本系统综述中选择文章所适用的纳入标准为:(1)任何通过流行病学(发病率或患病率)和/或临床(门诊咨询、急诊就诊或住院)标准,研究大麻娱乐用途合法化对精神病风险(根据ICD-9、ICD-10、DSM-4或DSM-5诊断的任何类型精神病)潜在影响的文章;(2)任何类型的研究(横断面研究、纵向研究、前瞻性研究、回顾性研究、干预性研究和实验性研究),其方法包括对与大麻娱乐用途合法化相关的精神病风险进行时间和/或地理比较,但文献综述和临床病例描述除外;(3)所研究人群的年龄和出版日期没有限制;(4)用英语或法语撰写的文章。在两位作者对识别出的160篇文章进行评估后,七项研究被纳入本系统文献综述,这些研究调查了大麻娱乐用途合法化对精神病风险的影响。

结果

四项研究表明,大麻娱乐用途合法化后,用于治疗精神病的医疗服务使用量没有增加,而其他三项研究则强调了大麻娱乐用途合法化对精神病风险有负面影响。所有这些研究均在北美进行,且科学证据水平较低。

结论

鉴于评估大麻娱乐用途合法化对精神病风险的影响较为复杂,通过质量更高的科学研究进行额外调查至关重要。然而,根据现有数据,有一些证据表明大麻娱乐用途合法化可能对心理健康有潜在负面影响。在这种情况下,如果大麻娱乐用途合法化,建议采用低风险使用大麻的方式(限制使用频率、推迟首次消费年龄、控制产品中的四氢大麻酚含量并加强预防/教育)似乎至关重要。最后,为了使公共卫生策略能够动态演变,随着大麻合法化的发展,持续监测的建立至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验