Suppr超能文献

硝苯地平与吲达帕胺治疗动脉高血压的对比效果

[Comparative effects of nifedipine and indapamide in the treatment of arterial hypertension].

作者信息

Chaignon M, Lucsko M, Rapoud J P, Aubert P, Guédon J

出版信息

Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1985 Nov;78 Spec No:67-72.

PMID:3937509
Abstract

A controlled multicentre trial was organised to compare the effects of 20 mg Nifedipine tablets (N) and 2,5 mg Indapamide tablets (I) during a 4 months' treatment period after a placebo period, in 59 patients with moderate essential hypertension (n = 59). The results of blood pressure measurements of 18 patients treated by nifedipine (1 tablet twice daily) and 22 patients treated by indapamide (1 tablet every morning) were compared. The systolic blood pressure, after 10 minutes recumbency, fell from 165 +/- 10 mmHg to 148 +/- 13 mmHg (p less than 0.01), and the diastolic pressure from 104 +/- 6 mmHg to 86 +/- 7 mmHg (p less than 0.01) in the patients treated with nifedipine. In the indapamide group, the SBP fell from 164 +/- 13 mmHg to 152 +/- 15 mmHg (p less than 0.01) and the DBP from 100 +/- 4 mmHg to 87 +/- 6 mmHg (p less than 0.01). There were no significant changes of heart rate with either drug; plasma creatinine, potassium and uric acid concentrations were also unchanged. There was a higher incidence of headaches and tiredness in the nifedipine group, whilst patients treated with indapamide complained more often of muscular cramps. Flushing was observed in nearly a quarter of the patients in both groups. These results confirm that both nifedipine and indapamide induce significant and persistant falls in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Although the fall was greater with nifedipine than with indapamide, the difference was not statistically significant. The tolerance was satisfactory in both groups of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

组织了一项对照多中心试验,以比较59例中度原发性高血压患者(n = 59)在经过安慰剂期后,20毫克硝苯地平片(N)和2.5毫克吲达帕胺片(I)在4个月治疗期的效果。比较了18例接受硝苯地平治疗(每日两次,每次1片)和22例接受吲达帕胺治疗(每天早晨1片)患者的血压测量结果。硝苯地平治疗组患者在平卧10分钟后,收缩压从165±10 mmHg降至148±13 mmHg(p<0.01),舒张压从104±6 mmHg降至86±7 mmHg(p<0.01)。在吲达帕胺组中,收缩压从164±13 mmHg降至152±15 mmHg(p<0.01),舒张压从100±4 mmHg降至87±6 mmHg(p<0.01)。两种药物治疗后心率均无显著变化;血浆肌酐、钾和尿酸浓度也未改变。硝苯地平组头痛和疲劳的发生率较高,而接受吲达帕胺治疗的患者更常抱怨肌肉痉挛。两组中近四分之一的患者出现潮红。这些结果证实,硝苯地平和吲达帕胺均可使收缩压和舒张压显著且持续下降。虽然硝苯地平的降压幅度大于吲达帕胺,但差异无统计学意义。两组患者的耐受性均令人满意。(摘要截选至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验