• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共享自动驾驶汽车可接受性中感知风险维度的调查:一项中介调节分析

An investigation of perceived risk dimensions in acceptability of shared autonomous vehicles, a mediation-moderation analysis.

作者信息

Abbasi Mohammadhossein, Mamdoohi Amir Reza, Ciari Francesco, Sierpiński Grzegorz

机构信息

Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Civil, Geological and Mining Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 7;14(1):23276. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74024-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-74024-0
PMID:39375496
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11458571/
Abstract

The integration of shared and autonomous mobility has led to the emergence of shared autonomous vehicles with ride-sharing services (SAVWRS), which have the potential to significantly reduce private car usage and promote sustainable transportation. Despite numerous studies on this topic, there is still no research examining the impact of all dimensions of perceived risk theory on usage intention. Therefore, we aim to investigate these relationships and gain deeper insights by examining the mediating effect of trust and the moderating effect of generation (Millennials vs. Baby Boomers) to address potential disparities across generations. To gather insights, we design an online survey that was completed by a random sample of 723 individuals in 2021. The estimation results of the structural equation model reveal that all perceived risk dimensions (social, performance, time, physical, security, and financial risks, in descending order) are negatively related to consumers' intention. Additionally, trust fully mediates the relationships between performance, physical, financial, and security risks and usage intention, whereas it partially mediates the relationships between social and time risks and the intention to use. Furthermore, moderation analysis revealed that Millennials are less concerned about most dimensions of perceived risk theory, except for social and time risks. In conclusion, our study contributes to a deeper understanding of the complex relationships between perceived risk dimensions, trust, and usage intention in SAVWRS. Our findings suggest that policymakers and industry stakeholders should consider strategies to address these concerns to promote widespread acceptance of SAVWRS.

摘要

共享出行与自动驾驶的融合催生了具备拼车服务功能的共享自动驾驶汽车(SAVWRS),这类汽车有潜力大幅减少私家车的使用,并推动可持续交通的发展。尽管针对这一主题已有大量研究,但仍未有研究考察感知风险理论的各个维度对使用意愿的影响。因此,我们旨在通过研究信任的中介作用以及代际(千禧一代与婴儿潮一代)的调节作用来探讨这些关系,以深入了解不同代际间可能存在的差异。为了获取相关见解,我们设计了一项在线调查,该调查于2021年由723名个体的随机样本完成。结构方程模型的估计结果显示,所有感知风险维度(按降序排列依次为社会风险、性能风险、时间风险、身体风险、安全风险和财务风险)均与消费者的使用意愿呈负相关。此外,信任在性能风险、身体风险、财务风险和安全风险与使用意愿之间的关系中起完全中介作用,而在社会风险和时间风险与使用意愿之间的关系中起部分中介作用。此外,调节分析表明,除社会风险和时间风险外,千禧一代对感知风险理论的大多数维度的担忧程度较低。总之,我们的研究有助于更深入地理解SAVWRS中感知风险维度、信任和使用意愿之间的复杂关系。我们的研究结果表明,政策制定者和行业利益相关者应考虑采取策略来解决这些问题,以促进SAVWRS的广泛接受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/11458571/d919af4e1dcc/41598_2024_74024_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/11458571/97407da087cb/41598_2024_74024_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/11458571/e6b04212de90/41598_2024_74024_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/11458571/d919af4e1dcc/41598_2024_74024_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/11458571/97407da087cb/41598_2024_74024_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/11458571/e6b04212de90/41598_2024_74024_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/11458571/d919af4e1dcc/41598_2024_74024_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An investigation of perceived risk dimensions in acceptability of shared autonomous vehicles, a mediation-moderation analysis.共享自动驾驶汽车可接受性中感知风险维度的调查:一项中介调节分析
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 7;14(1):23276. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74024-0.
2
Understanding Autonomous Shuttle Adoption Intention: Predictive Power of Pre-Trial Perceptions and Attitudes.理解自动驾驶班车的采用意愿:审判前感知和态度的预测力。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 26;22(23):9193. doi: 10.3390/s22239193.
3
Psychological factors affecting potential users' intention to use autonomous vehicles.影响潜在用户使用自动驾驶汽车意愿的心理因素。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 16;18(3):e0282915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282915. eCollection 2023.
4
The path to sustainability begins with going paperless: Antecedents of intention to use electronic wallet using serial mediation approach.可持续发展之路始于无纸化:采用串行中介方法研究使用电子钱包意图的前因。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 12;10(2):e24127. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24127. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
5
The Effect of Baby Food E-Store Image (for Ages 0-3) on Consumers' Purchase Intention.婴幼儿食品电商店铺形象(针对0至3岁)对消费者购买意愿的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 30;12:796750. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.796750. eCollection 2021.
6
Exploring the attitudes of Millennials and Generation Xers toward ridesourcing services.探究千禧一代和X一代对拼车服务的态度。
Transportation (Amst). 2022;49(6):1765-1799. doi: 10.1007/s11116-021-10227-y. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
7
The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Consumers' Intention to Use Shared-Mobility Services in German Cities.新冠疫情对德国城市消费者使用共享出行服务意愿的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 1;12:646593. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646593. eCollection 2021.
8
Exploring non-users' intention to adopt ride-sharing services: Taking into account increased risks due to the COVID-19 pandemic among other factors.探究非用户采用拼车服务的意愿:考虑到新冠疫情等因素导致的风险增加。
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2022 Apr;158:180-195. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
9
Exploring the influence of Chinese online patient trust on telemedicine behavior: insights into perceived risk and behavior intention.探索中国在线患者信任对远程医疗行为的影响:感知风险和行为意愿的洞察。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 23;12:1415889. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1415889. eCollection 2024.
10
Determinants and the Moderating Effects of Individual Characteristics on Autonomous Vehicle Adoption in China.中国自动驾驶汽车采用的决定因素及个体特征的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 20;20(1):43. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010043.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the Key Antecedents Influencing Consumer's Continuance Intention toward Bike-Sharing Services: Focus on China.探究影响消费者持续使用共享单车意愿的关键前置因素:以中国为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 24;17(12):4556. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124556.
2
Public Acceptance of Fully Automated Driving: Effects of Social Trust and Risk/Benefit Perceptions.公众对全自动驾驶的接受度:社会信任和风险/收益感知的影响。
Risk Anal. 2019 Feb;39(2):326-341. doi: 10.1111/risa.13143. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
3
How Safe Is Safe Enough for Self-Driving Vehicles?
自动驾驶汽车的安全标准应该达到多高才算足够安全?
Risk Anal. 2019 Feb;39(2):315-325. doi: 10.1111/risa.13116. Epub 2018 May 21.
4
Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust.对自动化的信任:整合关于影响信任因素的实证证据。
Hum Factors. 2015 May;57(3):407-34. doi: 10.1177/0018720814547570. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
5
Willingness to pay for quality of life technologies to enhance independent functioning among baby boomers and the elderly adults.为提高婴儿潮一代和老年人的独立生活能力而支付生活质量技术费用的意愿。
Gerontologist. 2014 Jun;54(3):363-74. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt016. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
6
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.社会心理学研究中的调节变量与中介变量区分:概念、策略及统计考量
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.