Kelpin Sydney, Brockman Tabetha A, Decker Paul A, Young Antonia, Boehmer Kasey, Nguyen Aaron, Kamath Celia, St Sauver Jennifer, Sinicrope Pamela S, Sharma Pravesh, McCoy Rozalina, Allen Summer, Huang Ming, Pritchett Joshua, Esterov Dmitry, Lampman Michelle, Petersen Carolyn, Cheville Andrea, Patten Christi A
Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, Behavioral Health Research Program, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Oct 8;4(1):194. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00624-6.
Cigarette smoking prevalence is higher for rural than urban adults, yet digital access to cessation programming is reduced. We aim to investigate digital access interventions to promote engagement with an online evidence-based cessation treatment (EBCT) program among rural adults.
This pilot trial used a pragmatic, three-arm, randomized, parallel-group design (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05209451). Inclusion criteria included being aged ≥18, Mayo Clinic Midwest patient, rural residency, and currently smokes cigarettes. All participants received an online, 12-week EBCT program and were randomized to receive one of three digital access interventions: print materials (control, n = 30); print materials + loaner iPad device with data plan coverage (n = 30); or print materials + loaner device + up to six, 15-20-minute motivational interviewing-based coaching calls to support technology needs (n = 30). A composite score of trial engagement (primary outcome) and self-reported smoking abstinence and use of EBCT resources (secondary outcomes) were assessed online at 4 and 12 weeks. Qualitative interviews were used to assess patient experience. Neither participants nor outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment.
Results are reported for all 30 participants in each group. The average age of participants is 51.0 years and 61% are women. We show no significant arm differences for the trial engagement composite score (p = 0.30). We also find coaching support is significantly (p < 0.05) associated with enhanced smoking-related treatment response, including cigarette abstinence and use of EBCT resources, and participants reported positive experiences with the intervention.
The coaching intervention to support technology needs is acceptable and shows preliminary evidence of its efficacy in smoking-related treatment response. Further studies could refine and implement the coaching intervention for trial engagement and long-term cessation.
农村成年人的吸烟率高于城市成年人,但农村成年人获取戒烟项目的数字渠道较少。我们旨在研究数字接入干预措施,以促进农村成年人参与基于证据的在线戒烟治疗(EBCT)项目。
这项试点试验采用了实用的三臂随机平行组设计(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT05209451)。纳入标准包括年龄≥18岁、梅奥诊所中西部患者、农村居民且目前吸烟。所有参与者都接受了为期12周的在线EBCT项目,并被随机分配接受三种数字接入干预措施之一:印刷材料(对照组,n = 30);印刷材料 + 带有数据套餐的借用iPad设备(n = 30);或印刷材料 + 借用设备 + 最多六次、每次15 - 20分钟的基于动机访谈的指导电话,以满足技术需求(n = 30)。在第4周和第12周通过在线方式评估试验参与度(主要结果)的综合评分以及自我报告的戒烟情况和EBCT资源使用情况(次要结果)。采用定性访谈评估患者体验。参与者和结果评估者均未对分组情况进行盲法处理。
报告了每组30名参与者的结果。参与者的平均年龄为51.0岁,61%为女性。我们发现试验参与度综合评分在各干预组之间无显著差异(p = 0.30)。我们还发现,指导支持与增强吸烟相关治疗反应显著相关(p < 0.05),包括戒烟和EBCT资源的使用,并且参与者对干预措施给予了积极评价。
支持技术需求的指导干预措施是可接受的,并且显示出在吸烟相关治疗反应方面有效性的初步证据。进一步的研究可以完善并实施指导干预措施,以提高试验参与度和实现长期戒烟。