• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字健康公平框架。

A framework for digital health equity.

作者信息

Richardson Safiya, Lawrence Katharine, Schoenthaler Antoinette M, Mann Devin

机构信息

New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Aug 18;5(1):119. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00663-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-022-00663-0
PMID:35982146
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9387425/
Abstract

We present a comprehensive Framework for Digital Health Equity, detailing key digital determinants of health (DDoH), to support the work of digital health tool creators in industry, health systems operations, and academia. The rapid digitization of healthcare may widen health disparities if solutions are not developed with these determinants in mind. Our framework builds on the leading health disparities framework, incorporating a digital environment domain. We examine DDoHs at the individual, interpersonal, community, and societal levels, discuss the importance of a root cause, multi-level approach, and offer a pragmatic case study that applies our framework.

摘要

我们提出了一个全面的数字健康公平框架,详细阐述了关键的健康数字决定因素(DDoH),以支持行业、卫生系统运营和学术界的数字健康工具创造者的工作。如果在开发解决方案时没有考虑到这些决定因素,医疗保健的快速数字化可能会扩大健康差距。我们的框架建立在领先的健康差距框架基础上,纳入了数字环境领域。我们在个人、人际、社区和社会层面审视了DDoH,讨论了根本原因、多层次方法的重要性,并提供了一个应用我们框架的务实案例研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cda/9388506/7d027353ac47/41746_2022_663_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cda/9388506/7d027353ac47/41746_2022_663_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cda/9388506/7d027353ac47/41746_2022_663_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A framework for digital health equity.数字健康公平框架。
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Aug 18;5(1):119. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00663-0.
2
Digital determinants of health as a way to address multilevel complex causal model in the promotion of Digital health equity and the prevention of digital health inequities: A scoping review.将健康的数字决定因素作为解决促进数字健康公平和预防数字健康不平等的多层次复杂因果模型的一种方式:一项范围综述
J Public Health Res. 2024 Jan 17;13(1):22799036231220352. doi: 10.1177/22799036231220352. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Strategies and solutions to address Digital Determinants of Health (DDOH) across underinvested communities.针对投资不足社区的健康数字决定因素(DDOH)的策略与解决方案。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Oct 12;2(10):e0000314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000314. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
5
An introduction to digital determinants of health.健康数字决定因素介绍。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Jan 4;3(1):e0000346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000346. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
Digital Health Equity数字健康公平性
7
Perspectives From the National Institutes of Health on Multidimensional Mental Health Disparities Research: A Framework for Advancing the Field.美国国立卫生研究院关于多维心理健康差异研究的观点:推进该领域的框架。
Am J Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;179(6):417-421. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.21100969.
8
Digital Health Equity and COVID-19: The Innovation Curve Cannot Reinforce the Social Gradient of Health.数字健康公平与新冠疫情:创新曲线无法强化健康方面的社会梯度。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 2;22(6):e19361. doi: 10.2196/19361.
9
Equity and Accessibility of Washington State's COVID-19 Digital Exposure Notification Tool (WA Notify): Survey and Listening Sessions Among Community Leaders.华盛顿州新冠病毒数字接触者通知工具(WA Notify)的公平性与可及性:针对社区领袖的调查与听证会
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 3;6(8):e38193. doi: 10.2196/38193.
10
Income inequality, structural racism, and Canada's low performance in health equity.收入不平等、结构性种族主义与加拿大在健康公平方面的糟糕表现。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2018 Nov;31(6):245-251. doi: 10.1177/0840470418791868. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and interventions for postpartum depression: Systematic review.产后抑郁症的流行病学、病理生理学及干预措施:系统评价
World J Clin Cases. 2025 Oct 16;13(29):110948. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i29.110948.
2
Digitizing HIV care in Uganda: Patient and provider perspectives on the AmFine patient portal.乌干达的艾滋病护理数字化:患者和医护人员对AmFine患者门户网站的看法。
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 8;11:20552076251376270. doi: 10.1177/20552076251376270. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Shaping the Future of Digital Health Education in Canada: Prioritizing Competencies for Health Care Professionals Using the Quintuple Aim.

本文引用的文献

1
Focusing on Digital Health Equity.关注数字健康公平性。
JAMA. 2021 Nov 9;326(18):1795-1796. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.18459.
2
Disparities in telehealth use: How should the supportive care community respond?远程医疗使用中的差异:支持性护理社区应如何应对?
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Feb;30(2):1007-1010. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06629-4. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
3
Impact of COVID-19 on the digital divide: a rapid review.新冠疫情对数字鸿沟的影响:快速综述。
塑造加拿大数字健康教育的未来:利用“五重目标”确定医疗保健专业人员的能力优先事项。
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Sep 8;11:e75904. doi: 10.2196/75904.
4
Creating Digital Health Technology for Gender Equity: a Capabilities Approach.为性别平等创建数字健康技术:一种能力方法。
Public Health Ethics. 2025 Aug 22;18(3):phaf012. doi: 10.1093/phe/phaf012. eCollection 2025 Nov.
5
Determinants of mistrust in digital health research and approaches to address them among Muslim ethnic minorities living in the United Kingdom: a qualitative study.英国穆斯林少数族裔对数字健康研究不信任的决定因素及解决方法:一项定性研究
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Aug 15;24(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02583-3.
6
Understanding Inequalities in Mobile Health Utilization Across Phases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.了解移动健康在各阶段使用中的不平等现象:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 14;27:e71349. doi: 10.2196/71349.
7
Use of Digital Technology Among Older Adults in Poland With and Those Without Near Visual Impairment: Cross-Sectional Study.波兰有和没有近视力障碍的老年人使用数字技术情况:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 11;27:e68947. doi: 10.2196/68947.
8
Measuring Reliable Internet Connectivity Among Families with Children: Secondary Analysis of a US National Survey.测量有孩子家庭的可靠互联网连接情况:一项美国全国性调查的二次分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 8;27:e69304. doi: 10.2196/69304.
9
European digital transformation for Roma girls' health: the case of Spain.欧洲罗姆女孩健康领域的数字转型:以西班牙为例。
Front Sociol. 2025 Jul 22;10:1562088. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1562088. eCollection 2025.
10
Disparities in Internet Medical Service Utilization Among Patients in Post-COVID-19 China: Cross-Sectional Study of Data From Provincial Field and National Online Surveys.新冠疫情后中国患者互联网医疗服务利用的差异:基于省级实地调查和全国在线调查数据的横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 1;27:e60546. doi: 10.2196/60546.
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 12;11(10):e053440. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053440.
4
Digital Redlining and Cardiovascular Innovation.数字红线与心血管创新。
Circulation. 2021 Sep 21;144(12):913-915. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056532. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
5
Digital inclusion as a social determinant of health.数字包容作为健康的社会决定因素。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Mar 17;4(1):52. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00413-8.
6
Telemedicine and healthcare disparities: a cohort study in a large healthcare system in New York City during COVID-19.远程医疗与医疗保健差距:在 COVID-19 期间纽约市大型医疗系统中的一项队列研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jan 15;28(1):33-41. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa217.
7
Hidden in Plain Sight - Reconsidering the Use of Race Correction in Clinical Algorithms.隐匿于众目睽睽之下——重新审视临床算法中种族校正的应用
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 27;383(9):874-882. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms2004740. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
8
Digital Health Equity and COVID-19: The Innovation Curve Cannot Reinforce the Social Gradient of Health.数字健康公平与新冠疫情:创新曲线无法强化健康方面的社会梯度。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 2;22(6):e19361. doi: 10.2196/19361.
9
Impact of the digital divide in the age of COVID-19.新冠疫情时代数字鸿沟的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(7):1147-1148. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa078.
10
Assessment of Heart Failure Patients' Interest in Mobile Health Apps for Self-Care: Survey Study.心力衰竭患者对用于自我护理的移动健康应用程序的兴趣评估:调查研究
JMIR Cardio. 2019 Oct 29;3(2):e14332. doi: 10.2196/14332.