• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估无烟家庭安全关怀(一种综合干预措施)在美国处于二手烟暴露和儿童虐待风险家庭中的有效性:一项混合 1 型试验的研究方案。

Evaluating the effectiveness of Smoke-Free Home SafeCare, an integrated intervention, among families at risk for secondhand smoke exposure and child maltreatment in the United States: a study protocol for a hybrid type 1 trial.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Trials. 2024 Oct 7;25(1):661. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08466-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08466-2
PMID:39375710
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11457381/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Secondhand smoke exposure (SHS) and child maltreatment (CM) are preventable yet have negative lifelong impacts on health. When considered together, the risk for negative health outcomes may be compounded, especially for people living in low-resource settings. Evidence-based interventions exist for preventing CM and reducing SHS among families with low resources; however, no programs jointly target SHS exposure and maltreatment risk.

METHODS

This study is a hybrid type 1 trial to examine the effectiveness of a systematically braided intervention to target CM risk and SHS in the home. Fifty SafeCare Providers will be randomized to deliver either standard SafeCare (i.e., the SafeCare model alone; active treatment control; n = 25) or Smoke-Free Home SafeCare (SFHSC; treatment condition; n = 25), the braided intervention that includes both SafeCare and the Smoke-Free Homes: Some Things are Better Outside intervention to N = 500 families. Aim 2 is to assess family-level outcomes. The primary outcome is a full home smoking ban, validated by air nicotine monitors; secondary outcomes include parenting and smoking outcomes. Aim 3 is to evaluate process and implementation outcomes, including cost-benefit. We will use multilevel models and ROC analyses to evaluate and validate the primary outcome. We will use tests of non-inferiority to evaluate secondary outcomes. Cost-effectiveness analyses will be used to assess cost-benefit of SFHSC.

DISCUSSION

This study will be the first to document the outcomes of a multi-component intervention to address cumulative risk factors that impact cancer risk among children whose parents are at risk or involved in child-protective services. Integrating an evidence-based intervention that targets SHS exposure in the home with a broadly disseminated CM prevention intervention may be a sustainable way to help reduce the compounded effects of SHS in the home and CM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05000632. Registered on August 11, 2021.

摘要

背景

二手烟暴露(SHS)和儿童虐待(CM)是可以预防的,但它们会对健康造成终身负面影响。当两者同时考虑时,负面健康结果的风险可能会加剧,尤其是对于生活在资源匮乏环境中的人。已经有针对资源匮乏家庭的 CM 预防和减少 SHS 的循证干预措施;然而,没有针对 SHS 暴露和虐待风险的联合项目。

方法

本研究是一种混合型 1 期试验,旨在检验针对家庭中 CM 风险和 SHS 的系统编织干预措施的有效性。50 名安全护理提供者将被随机分配到标准安全护理组(即安全护理模式单独;主动治疗对照组;n=25)或无烟家庭安全护理组(治疗组;n=25),该编织干预措施包括安全护理和无烟家庭:有些东西在外面更好干预措施,共涉及 500 个家庭。目标 2 是评估家庭层面的结果。主要结果是通过空气尼古丁监测器验证的全面家庭禁烟;次要结果包括育儿和吸烟结果。目标 3 是评估过程和实施结果,包括成本效益。我们将使用多层模型和 ROC 分析来评估和验证主要结果。我们将使用非劣效性检验来评估次要结果。成本效益分析将用于评估无烟家庭安全护理的成本效益。

讨论

本研究将首次记录一种多成分干预措施的结果,该措施旨在解决影响父母处于风险中或参与儿童保护服务的儿童癌症风险的累积风险因素。将针对家庭中 SHS 暴露的循证干预措施与广泛传播的 CM 预防干预措施相结合,可能是一种可持续的方法,有助于减少家庭中 SHS 和 CM 的复合效应。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov,NCT05000632。于 2021 年 8 月 11 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84a2/11457381/40de7891e4c7/13063_2024_8466_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84a2/11457381/40de7891e4c7/13063_2024_8466_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84a2/11457381/40de7891e4c7/13063_2024_8466_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the effectiveness of Smoke-Free Home SafeCare, an integrated intervention, among families at risk for secondhand smoke exposure and child maltreatment in the United States: a study protocol for a hybrid type 1 trial.评估无烟家庭安全关怀(一种综合干预措施)在美国处于二手烟暴露和儿童虐待风险家庭中的有效性:一项混合 1 型试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Oct 7;25(1):661. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08466-2.
2
Systematic braiding of Smoke-Free Home SafeCare to address child maltreatment risk and secondhand smoke exposure: findings from a pilot study.无烟家庭安全护理的系统编织以应对儿童虐待风险和二手烟暴露:一项试点研究的结果。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 May 12;9(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01303-4.
3
Muslim Communities Learning About Second-hand Smoke in Bangladesh (MCLASS II): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a community-based smoke-free homes intervention, with or without Indoor Air Quality feedback.孟加拉国穆斯林社区了解二手烟情况(MCLASS II):一项基于社区的无烟家庭干预集群随机对照试验的研究方案,该干预有或没有室内空气质量反馈。
Trials. 2019 Jan 5;20(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3100-y.
4
Implementation of a trauma-informed, evidence-informed intervention for Latinx families experiencing interpersonal violence and child maltreatment: protocol for a pilot randomized control trial of SafeCare+®.为遭受人际暴力和儿童虐待的拉丁裔家庭实施以创伤为导向、循证为基础的干预措施:SafeCare+®试点随机对照试验方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Oct 8;6:153. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00681-3. eCollection 2020.
5
Contribution of thirdhand smoke to overall tobacco smoke exposure in pediatric patients: study protocol.三手烟对儿科患者烟草烟雾暴露总量的影响:研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 2;19(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6829-7.
6
Cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to reduce children's exposure to second-hand smoke in the home.减少儿童在家中接触二手烟的复杂干预措施的成本效益。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 13;18(1):1252. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6140-z.
7
Secondhand smoke exposure of children at home and prevalence of parental smoking following implementation of the new tobacco control law in Macao.澳门实施新控烟法后儿童在家中的二手烟暴露情况及家长吸烟率
Public Health. 2017 Mar;144:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.11.018. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Social disparities in parental smoking and young children's exposure to secondhand smoke at home: a time-trend analysis of repeated cross-sectional data from the German KiGGS study between 2003-2006 and 2009-2012.父母吸烟及幼儿在家接触二手烟方面的社会差异:对2003 - 2006年及2009 - 2012年德国KiGGS研究重复横断面数据的时间趋势分析
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jun 8;16:485. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3175-x.
10
Impact of Public Smoking Bans on Social Inequalities in Children's Exposure to Tobacco Smoke at Home: An Equity-Focused Systematic Review.公共场所禁烟令对儿童在家中接触烟草烟雾的社会不平等影响:一项关注公平的系统性综述。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Oct 26;21(11):1462-1472. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty139.

本文引用的文献

1
Advancing the science of integrating multiple interventions by blending and bundling.推进整合多种干预措施的科学,采用混合和捆绑的方法。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023 Aug 31;7(5). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkad070.
2
Systematic braiding of Smoke-Free Home SafeCare to address child maltreatment risk and secondhand smoke exposure: findings from a pilot study.无烟家庭安全护理的系统编织以应对儿童虐待风险和二手烟暴露:一项试点研究的结果。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 May 12;9(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01303-4.
3
Global, regional, and national deaths, disability-adjusted life years, years lived with disability, and years of life lost for the global disease burden attributable to second-hand smoke, 1990-2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.
1990 - 2019年全球、区域和国家因二手烟导致的全球疾病负担所致的死亡、伤残调整生命年、带病生存年和生命损失年:全球疾病负担研究的系统分析
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Mar 1;862:160677. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160677. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
4
Trends in Secondhand Smoke Exposure, 2011-2018: Impact and Implications of Expanding Serum Cotinine Range.2011 - 2018年二手烟暴露趋势:血清可替宁范围扩大的影响及意义
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Sep;61(3):e109-e117. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
5
Disparities in Secondhand Smoke Exposure in the United States: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2018.美国二手烟暴露的差异:2011-2018 年国家健康和营养调查。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jan 1;181(1):134-137. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3975.
6
Association between postnatal second-hand smoke exposure and ADHD in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童产后二手烟暴露与 ADHD 之间的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jan;28(2):1370-1380. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11269-y. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
7
Effect of the SafeCare© intervention on parenting outcomes among parents in child welfare systems: A cluster randomized trial.安全护理©干预对儿童福利系统中父母养育结果的影响:一项群组随机试验。
Prev Med. 2020 Sep;138:106167. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106167. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
8
Tobacco smoke exposure disparities persist in U.S. children: NHANES 1999-2014.美国儿童的烟草烟雾暴露差异依然存在:NHANES 1999-2014 年。
Prev Med. 2019 Jun;123:138-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.028. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
9
Maternal Smoking Before and During Pregnancy and the Risk of Sudden Unexpected Infant Death.母亲孕前和孕期吸烟与婴儿突发意外死亡风险。
Pediatrics. 2019 Apr;143(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3325. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
10
Healthcare Costs of Secondhand Smoke Exposure at Home for U.S. Children.美国家庭中二手烟暴露对儿童的医疗费用。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Feb;56(2):281-287. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Dec 12.