Faculty of Health Sciences, FP-I3ID, University Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal.
UNIPRO-Oral Pathology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS-CESPU), Gandra, Portugal.
Int Wound J. 2024 Oct;21(10):e70047. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70047.
Surgical success includes a planned incision, achieving haemostasis, good mechanical closure and optimal maintenance of the surgical wound. New materials, as tissue adhesives, have been suggested as substitutes for sutures, to overcome their disadvantages. This study aimed at gathering the differences of using surgical adhesives in oral surgery compared with the conventional method of using sutures as a wound closure technique. PRISMA analyses, PICO criteria and PubMed/Medline database, EBSCO and Cochrane Library were used for research. Inclusion criteria included prospective, randomized controlled trials and case-control studies published in English with full access, where clinical advantages and demerits/limitations were reported in patients who underwent oral surgical incisions, without time restrictions. Exclusion criteria comprised literature with lower level of evidence. A total of 15 studies were assessed and analysed 15 parameters as alternatives to sutures (100%), cost-effectiveness (6,6%), postoperative pain (53,3%), time consumption (73,3%), haemostasis (46,6%), homeostasis (13,3%), aids healing (26,6%), tissue inflammation (26,6%), safety (6,6%), graft dimension (3,13), biocompatibility (13,3%), adhesion to tissue (6,6%), bacteriostatic effect (20%), oedema (13,3%) and ease of application (26,6). Selected articles' results indicate that surgical glues can be a suitable alternative and/or adjuvant to oral sutures, presenting numerous advantages.
手术的成功包括计划好的切口、实现止血、良好的机械闭合和手术伤口的最佳维护。为了克服缝线的缺点,已经有新的材料,如组织粘合剂,被提议作为缝线的替代品。本研究旨在收集在口腔手术中使用手术粘合剂与传统的缝线闭合技术相比的差异。使用 PRISMA 分析、PICO 标准以及 PubMed/Medline 数据库、EBSCO 和 Cochrane Library 进行研究。纳入标准包括前瞻性、随机对照试验和病例对照研究,以英文发表,全文可获取,并报告了接受口腔手术切口的患者的临床优势和缺点/局限性,无时间限制。排除标准包括证据水平较低的文献。共评估了 15 项研究,并分析了 15 个替代缝线的参数(100%)、成本效益(6.6%)、术后疼痛(53.3%)、耗时(73.3%)、止血(46.6%)、体内平衡(13.3%)、促进愈合(26.6%)、组织炎症(26.6%)、安全性(6.6%)、移植物尺寸(3.13%)、生物相容性(13.3%)、与组织的粘附性(6.6%)、抑菌作用(20%)、水肿(13.3%)和易于应用(26.6%)。选定文章的结果表明,手术胶可以作为口腔缝线的合适替代品和/或辅助物,具有许多优点。