Kumar M Suresh, Natta Sreelakshmi, Shankar Gowri, Reddy S Hari Krishna, Visalakshi D, Seshiah G V
Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Meghna Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
J Int Oral Health. 2013 Oct;5(5):95-100. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
Closing the surgical incision is an important step in the surgical procedures, the success of surgery is sometimes compromised by the defective suturing techniques or improper suturing materials, black silk sutures are more or less most often used materials in the day today surgical procedures, but these suture materials demand more time and effort from the surgeon and there is a need to substitute these materials with more user friendly and more successful wound closing materials such as cyanoacrylates. This study intends to compare effectiveness of the black silk sutures with cyanoacrylate adhesives in closing the surgical incisions.
MATERIALS & METHODS: 10 patients of age group between 15-30 years who underwent bilateral apicoetomy were given 3-0 black silk sutures on one side and n-butyl-2cyanoacrylate adhesive on the other side of the frenum to close the surgical incision, and a clinical comparison was made on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 7th post-operative days, on the seventh postoperative day following removal of sutures, small punch biopsies were obtained from both the sites and the tissue specimens were examined under transmission electron microscope.
Clinical observations revealed that on the 3rd and 7th postoperative days epithelialization was better on the sides treated with n-butyl-2cyanoacrylate but the sites closed with black silk suture showed significant inflammation and scar formation , electron microscopic observation of both tissue specimens revealed that sutured tissue specimens showed dense inflammatory infiltrate but the sites treated with cyanoacrylate adhesive showed less inflammatory infiltrate and uniform distribution of neutrophils, lymphocytes, histocytes and eosinophils unlike the sutured specimens which showed more scar tissue and dense infiltrate concentrated along the margins of the gap.
This study has indicated that the use of cyanoacrylate glue has resulted in less postoperative inflammation and good clinical and histological healing when compared to the silk sutures. How to cite this article: Kumar MS, Natta S, Shankar G, Reddy SH, Visalakshi D, Seshiah GV. Comparison between Silk Sutures and Cyanoacrylate Adhesive in Human Mucosa- A Clinical and Histological Study. J Int Oral Health 2013;5(5):95-100.
关闭手术切口是外科手术中的一个重要步骤,手术的成功有时会因缝合技术有缺陷或缝合材料不当而受到影响。黑色丝线缝合线或多或少是当今外科手术中最常用的材料,但这些缝合材料需要外科医生花费更多时间和精力,因此有必要用更方便使用且伤口闭合更成功的材料(如氰基丙烯酸酯)来替代这些材料。本研究旨在比较黑色丝线缝合线与氰基丙烯酸酯粘合剂在关闭手术切口中的有效性。
10例年龄在15至30岁之间接受双侧根尖切除术的患者,在系带一侧使用3-0黑色丝线缝合线,另一侧使用正丁基-2-氰基丙烯酸酯粘合剂来关闭手术切口,并在术后第1天、第2天、第3天和第7天进行临床比较。术后第7天拆线后,从两个部位取小的穿刺活检组织,组织标本在透射电子显微镜下检查。
临床观察显示,术后第3天和第7天,用正丁基-2-氰基丙烯酸酯处理的一侧上皮化较好,但用黑色丝线缝合的部位有明显炎症和瘢痕形成。对两个组织标本的电子显微镜观察显示,缝合的组织标本有密集的炎性浸润,但用氰基丙烯酸酯粘合剂处理的部位炎性浸润较少,中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、组织细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞分布均匀,与缝合标本不同,缝合标本有更多瘢痕组织,密集浸润集中在间隙边缘。
本研究表明,与丝线缝合相比,使用氰基丙烯酸酯胶水术后炎症较少,临床和组织学愈合良好。如何引用本文:Kumar MS, Natta S, Shankar G, Reddy SH, Visalakshi D, Seshiah GV. 丝线缝合与氰基丙烯酸酯粘合剂在人体黏膜中的比较——一项临床和组织学研究。《国际口腔健康杂志》2013年;5(5):95 - 100。