• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于水等效厚度对胰腺癌质子治疗中因解剖结构变化及射束方向导致的分次间范围变化的研究。

Investigation of interfractional range variation owing to anatomical changes with beam directions based on water equivalent thickness in proton therapy for pancreatic cancer.

作者信息

Kikkawa Yuhei, Ueda Hideaki, Uchinami Yusuke, Katoh Norio, Aoyama Hidefumi, Ito Yoichi M, Yokokawa Kohei, Chen Ye, Matsuura Taeko, Miyamoto Naoki, Takao Seishin

机构信息

Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, North13 West8, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608628, Japan.

Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, North13 West8, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608628, Japan.

出版信息

J Radiat Res. 2024 Dec 3;65(6):813-823. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrae069.

DOI:10.1093/jrr/rrae069
PMID:39376078
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11629986/
Abstract

To assess the interfractional anatomical range variations (ARVs) with beam directions and their impact on dose distribution in intensity modulated proton therapy, we analyzed water equivalent thickness (WET) from 10 patients with pancreatic cancer. The distributions of the interfractional WET difference ($\Delta{\mathrm{WET}}^{\theta }$) across 360° were visualized using polar histograms. Interfractional ARVs were evaluated using the mean absolute error and ΔWET pass rate, indicating the percentage of $\Delta \mathrm{WE}{\mathrm{T}}^{\theta }$ < thresholds. The impact on dose distribution in proton therapy was evaluated based on two treatment plans for 40 Gy(RBE)/5 fractions: 'Plan A', using two beam angles, in which the target was closest to the body surface among four perpendicular directions; and 'Plan B', using two beam angles with small ARVs. Analysis revealed individual variations in angular trends of interfractional ARVs. Three distinct trends were identified: Group 1 exhibited small ARVs around posterior directions; Group 2 exhibited small ARVs except ~60°; Group 3 demonstrated minimal ARVs only ~90°. In dose evaluation, while 150° and 210° were selected in Plan B for 9 out of 10 patients, for the remaining patient, 60° and 90° were chosen. Comparing dose volume histogram parameters for all patients, Plan B significantly reduced target coverage loss while maintaining organ-at-risk sparing comparable to Plan A. These results demonstrated that selecting beam angles with small interfractional ARVs for each patient enhances the robustness of dose distribution, reducing target coverage loss.

摘要

为了评估调强质子治疗中分次间解剖范围变化(ARV)与射束方向的关系及其对剂量分布的影响,我们分析了10例胰腺癌患者的水等效厚度(WET)。使用极坐标直方图可视化360°范围内分次间WET差值($\Delta{\mathrm{WET}}^{\theta }$)的分布。使用平均绝对误差和ΔWET通过率评估分次间ARV,ΔWET通过率表示$\Delta \mathrm{WE}{\mathrm{T}}^{\theta }$ <阈值的百分比。基于40 Gy(RBE)/5次的两种治疗计划评估质子治疗中对剂量分布的影响:“计划A”,使用两个射束角度,其中在四个垂直方向中靶区最靠近体表;“计划B”,使用具有小ARV的两个射束角度。分析揭示了分次间ARV角向趋势的个体差异。确定了三种不同的趋势:第1组在后方方向附近表现出小的ARV;第2组在约60°除外表现出小的ARV;第3组仅在约90°表现出最小的ARV。在剂量评估中,虽然10例患者中有9例在计划B中选择了150°和210°,但对于其余患者,选择了60°和90°。比较所有患者的剂量体积直方图参数,计划B在保持与计划A相当的危及器官 sparing的同时,显著减少了靶区覆盖损失。这些结果表明,为每个患者选择具有小分次间ARV的射束角度可提高剂量分布的稳健性,减少靶区覆盖损失。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/17b5c90cdc12/rrae069f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/a63d77dec87e/rrae069f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/fd57f02e0bb8/rrae069f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/670eee4706c7/rrae069f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/556fa1d15753/rrae069f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/7c81b53a83a9/rrae069f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/40aff04220a9/rrae069f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/6d38db342de1/rrae069f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/50f949370ccf/rrae069f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/17b5c90cdc12/rrae069f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/a63d77dec87e/rrae069f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/fd57f02e0bb8/rrae069f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/670eee4706c7/rrae069f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/556fa1d15753/rrae069f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/7c81b53a83a9/rrae069f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/40aff04220a9/rrae069f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/6d38db342de1/rrae069f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/50f949370ccf/rrae069f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/596b/11629986/17b5c90cdc12/rrae069f9.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigation of interfractional range variation owing to anatomical changes with beam directions based on water equivalent thickness in proton therapy for pancreatic cancer.基于水等效厚度对胰腺癌质子治疗中因解剖结构变化及射束方向导致的分次间范围变化的研究。
J Radiat Res. 2024 Dec 3;65(6):813-823. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrae069.
2
Impact of interfractional anatomical variation and setup correction methods on interfractional dose variation in IMPT and VMAT plans for pancreatic cancer patients: A planning study.适形调强放疗(IMPT)和容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)计划中分次间解剖学变化和摆位校正方法对胰腺癌患者分次间剂量变化的影响:一项计划研究。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jul;21(7):49-59. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12883. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
3
A Beam-Angle-Selection Method to Improve Inter-Fraction Motion Robustness for Lung Tumor Irradiation With Passive Proton Scattering.一种用于提高被动质子散射治疗肺肿瘤的分次内运动稳定性的射束角度选择方法。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1533033820948052. doi: 10.1177/1533033820948052.
4
Probabilistic dose distribution from interfractional motion in carbon ion radiation therapy for prostate cancer shows rectum sparing with moderate target coverage degradation.前列腺癌碳离子放射治疗中分次间运动的概率剂量分布显示直肠受量降低,同时靶区覆盖度中度下降。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 31;13(8):e0203289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203289. eCollection 2018.
5
Comparing the dosimetric impact of interfractional anatomical changes in photon, proton and carbon ion radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer patients.比较胰腺癌患者在光子、质子和碳离子放射治疗中分次间解剖结构变化的剂量学影响。
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Apr 21;62(8):3051-3064. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa6419. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
6
Interfractional dose variations in the stomach and the bowels during breathhold intensity-modulated radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Implications for a dose-escalation strategy.在胰腺癌屏息调强放疗中胃和肠道的分次剂量变化:对剂量递增策略的影响。
Med Phys. 2013 Feb;40(2):021701. doi: 10.1118/1.4773033.
7
Worst case optimization for interfractional motion mitigation in carbon ion therapy of pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌碳离子治疗中分次间运动缓解的最坏情况优化
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Oct 7;11(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0705-8.
8
Impact of Multiple Beams on Plan Quality, Linear Energy Transfer Distribution, and Plan Robustness of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.多束射束对肺癌调强质子治疗的计划质量、线性能量传递分布及计划稳健性的影响
ACS Sens. 2021 Feb 26;6(2):408-417. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.0c01879. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
9
A serial 4DCT study to quantify range variations in charged particle radiotherapy of thoracic cancers.一项用于量化胸段癌粒子放疗中射程变化的系列4DCT研究。
J Radiat Res. 2014 Mar 1;55(2):309-19. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrt114. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
10
Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of interfractional anatomical variations on prostate proton therapy using daily in-room CT images.利用每日治疗室内 CT 图像评估分次间解剖学变化对前列腺质子治疗的剂量学影响。
Med Phys. 2011 Aug;38(8):4623-33. doi: 10.1118/1.3604152.

本文引用的文献

1
Robust Beam Selection Based on Water Equivalent Thickness Analysis in Passive Scattering Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer.基于水等效厚度分析的胰腺癌被动散射碳离子放疗中稳健的射束选择
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 28;15(9):2520. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092520.
2
The Feasibility of Stereotactic Body Proton Beam Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer.立体定向体部质子束治疗胰腺癌的可行性
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 20;14(19):4556. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194556.
3
Dosimetric impact of simulated changes in large bowel content during proton therapy with simultaneous integrated boost for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
模拟局部进展期胰腺癌质子调强放疗同时整合推量时大肠内容物变化对剂量学的影响。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Nov;22(11):90-98. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13429. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
4
Impact of interfractional anatomical variation and setup correction methods on interfractional dose variation in IMPT and VMAT plans for pancreatic cancer patients: A planning study.适形调强放疗(IMPT)和容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)计划中分次间解剖学变化和摆位校正方法对胰腺癌患者分次间剂量变化的影响:一项计划研究。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jul;21(7):49-59. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12883. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
5
Analysis of treatment process time for real-time-image gated-spot-scanning proton-beam therapy (RGPT) system.实时图像门控点扫描质子束治疗(RGPT)系统的治疗过程时间分析。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Feb;21(2):38-49. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12804. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
6
Beam angle optimization using angular dependency of range variation assessed via water equivalent path length (WEPL) calculation for head and neck proton therapy.利用水当量路径长度(WEPL)计算评估的射程变化角依赖性对头颈部质子治疗的射束角度优化。
Phys Med. 2020 Jan;69:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.11.021. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
7
Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group (AGITG) and Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) Guidelines for Pancreatic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT).澳大利亚胃肠肿瘤临床试验组(AGITG)和跨塔斯曼肿瘤放射治疗组(TROG)胰腺癌立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)指南。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020 May-Jun;10(3):e136-e146. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
8
Cancer statistics, 2019.癌症统计数据,2019 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
9
Robust radiotherapy planning.稳健的放射治疗计划。
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Nov 12;63(22):22TR02. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae659.
10
Relative Biological Effectiveness Uncertainties and Implications for Beam Arrangements and Dose Constraints in Proton Therapy.相对生物学效应不确定性及其对质子治疗中射束排布和剂量限制的影响。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jun;28(3):256-263. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2018.02.010.