Suppr超能文献

战斗医护兵听诊与胸部超声图像解读用于气胸检测的比较:看还是听?

Combat Medic-Performed Auscultation Versus Thoracic Ultrasound Image Interpretation for Pneumothorax Detection: Look or Listen?

作者信息

Brown Seth A, Carius Brandon M, Monti Jonathan D, Robeck Rachel S, Fritz Darron K

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, USA.

Emergency Medicine, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Sep 4;16(9):e68657. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68657. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Background Pneumothorax (PTX) is a potentially life-threatening condition encountered by U.S. Army combat medics on the battlefield. PTX, when left untreated, can progress to tension PTX, a leading cause of preventable death on the battlefield which can be difficult to diagnose based on physical exam alone due to variable physical exam findings. Prior literature shows medics can accurately use point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to diagnose PTX in cadaver and porcine models; however, no studies have directly compared the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound (US) and physical exams performed by this population. We sought to compare medic diagnostic accuracy of a simulated PTX using these two diagnostic modalities. Methodology We conducted a prospective, observational study in which medics from the Flight Paramedic Program at Joint Base San Antonio-Sam Houston, TX received a standardized 30-minute training on physical exam and US diagnosis of PTX, followed by a 20-minute hands-on US familiarization session. Participants were then randomly selected into cohorts to evaluate 12 high-fidelity manikin lung fields and 12 thoracic US video clips for the presence of PTX in a simulated combat environment. Cohorts evaluated the same manikins and thoracic US video clips but in opposing sequences. Our primary outcome compared the sensitivity and specificity of PTX identification via thoracic US image interpretation and physical exam. Results In total, 21 medics evaluated 252 hemithoraces and interpreted 252 thoracic US images. We found a statistically significant difference favoring medics' sensitivity with US image interpretation over physical exam to detect PTX (85.7% vs. 72.4%, p = 0.004). There was no statistically significant difference in specificity between these modalities (81.9% vs. 69.4%, p = 0.139). Conclusions After brief training, medics demonstrated greater sensitivity to detect PTX using thoracic US image interpretation compared to physical exam in a simulated combat environment. Further studies involving medics' ultrasound image acquisition capability in human patients in austere combat environments are warranted.

摘要

背景 气胸(PTX)是美国陆军战地医护人员在战场上可能遇到的危及生命的病症。气胸若不治疗,可能进展为张力性气胸,这是战场上可预防死亡的主要原因,由于体格检查结果多变,仅通过体格检查很难诊断。既往文献表明,医护人员能够在尸体和猪模型中准确使用即时超声(POCUS)诊断气胸;然而,尚无研究直接比较该人群进行超声(US)检查和体格检查的诊断准确性。我们试图比较医护人员使用这两种诊断方式对模拟气胸的诊断准确性。

方法 我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,来自德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥-萨姆休斯顿联合基地飞行护理计划的医护人员接受了30分钟关于体格检查和超声诊断气胸的标准化培训,随后进行了20分钟的超声实际操作熟悉环节。然后将参与者随机分为几组,在模拟战斗环境中评估12个高保真人体模型肺野和12个胸部超声视频片段是否存在气胸。各组以相反顺序评估相同的人体模型和胸部超声视频片段。我们的主要结果是比较通过胸部超声图像解读和体格检查识别气胸的敏感性和特异性。

结果 共有21名医护人员评估了252个半侧胸腔并解读了252张胸部超声图像。我们发现,在检测气胸方面,医护人员通过超声图像解读的敏感性显著高于体格检查(85.7%对72.4%,p = 0.004)。这两种方式在特异性方面无统计学显著差异(81.9%对69.4%,p = 0.139)。

结论 经过简短培训后,在模拟战斗环境中,医护人员通过胸部超声图像解读检测气胸的敏感性高于体格检查。有必要开展进一步研究,涉及医护人员在严峻战斗环境中对人类患者进行超声图像采集的能力。

相似文献

5
An Inventory of the Combat Medics' Aid Bag.战斗医护兵急救包清单。
J Spec Oper Med. 2020 Spring;20(1):61-64. doi: 10.55460/FUHO-CU87.

本文引用的文献

4
Ultrasound Evaluation of Soft-Tissue Foreign Bodies by US Army Medics.美国陆军医护人员对软组织异物的超声评估
J Med Ultrasound. 2018 Jul-Sep;26(3):147-152. doi: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_12_18. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
9
Clinical auscultation in noisy environments.嘈杂环境中的临床听诊。
J Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):492-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.07.039. Epub 2012 Mar 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验