Keelapattu Sai Pritam, Bangaragiri Ajay, Eada Chaitanya Sai
Medicine and Surgery, North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Carlisle, GBR.
Radiology, North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Carlisle, GBR.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 7;16(9):e68860. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68860. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and gout are two distinct types of inflammatory arthritis with significant morbidity. While RA is characterized by autoimmune synovitis, gout is defined by the deposition of urate crystals. Diagnosing these conditions becomes particularly challenging in patients with negative serological markers for RA, compounded by the patient's advanced age and potential for malignancy. This case involves a 77-year-old male with chronic gout, hypertension, chronic atrial fibrillation on edoxaban, diastolic congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease stage 3B, presenting with left knee pain and limited mobility. Despite negative serology for RA (rheumatoid factor (RF) <20.0 IU/ml, anti-CCP2 antibodies 1.2 U/mL), the clinical presentation raised suspicion for RA. Imaging revealed significant synovial hypertrophy and multiple periarticular lesions suggestive of chronic gouty tophi rather than RA or malignancy. The patient was managed with allopurinol, prednisolone, and colchicine and referred to rheumatology for further evaluation. Approximately 30% of RA patients may present with negative serological markers, complicating the diagnosis. Differentiating RA from gout is crucial due to differences in management strategies. Imaging modalities such as MRI and CT are essential in identifying characteristic changes of both conditions, such as synovial hypertrophy in RA and tophi in gout. In elderly patients, the possibility of malignancy should also be considered. This case highlights the complexity of diagnosing gouty arthritis mimicking seronegative RA, especially in elderly patients where the risk of malignancy must be considered. It underscores the need for comprehensive clinical and imaging evaluations and personalized treatment plans in managing patients with multiple comorbidities.
类风湿关节炎(RA)和痛风是两种不同类型的炎性关节炎,发病率较高。RA以自身免疫性滑膜炎为特征,而痛风则由尿酸盐结晶沉积所定义。对于RA血清学标志物阴性的患者,尤其是老年患者且有潜在恶性肿瘤风险时,诊断这些疾病极具挑战性。本病例为一名77岁男性,患有慢性痛风、高血压、正在服用依度沙班的慢性心房颤动、舒张性充血性心力衰竭以及3B期慢性肾脏病,表现为左膝疼痛和活动受限。尽管RA血清学检查结果为阴性(类风湿因子(RF)<20.0 IU/ml,抗CCP2抗体1.2 U/mL),但其临床表现仍引发了对RA的怀疑。影像学检查显示有明显的滑膜肥厚和多个关节周围病变,提示为慢性痛风石而非RA或恶性肿瘤。该患者接受了别嘌醇、泼尼松龙和秋水仙碱治疗,并转诊至风湿病科做进一步评估。约30%的RA患者可能出现血清学标志物阴性,这使得诊断变得复杂。由于治疗策略不同,区分RA和痛风至关重要。MRI和CT等影像学检查对于识别这两种疾病的特征性变化至关重要,如RA中的滑膜肥厚和痛风中的痛风石。对于老年患者,还应考虑恶性肿瘤的可能性。本病例突出了诊断类似血清阴性RA的痛风性关节炎的复杂性,尤其是在必须考虑恶性肿瘤风险的老年患者中。它强调了在管理患有多种合并症的患者时,需要进行全面的临床和影像学评估以及个性化的治疗方案。