Suppr超能文献

通过基于视频的评估对原始版和修订版多伦多西部痉挛性斜颈评定量表严重程度分量表进行评估的多学科共识:一项评分者间信度研究

Interdisciplinary Consensus in Evaluating the Severity Subscale of the Original and Revised Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale Through Video-Based Assessment: An Inter-Rater Reliability Study.

作者信息

Kassaye Shimelis Girma, De Pauw Joke, De Waele Ségolène, De Hertogh Willem, Gudina Esayas Kebede, Crosiers David

机构信息

Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy/Movant, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2024 Dec;11(12):1587-1591. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.14222. Epub 2024 Oct 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) is widely employed for cervical dystonia (CD) evaluation.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the inter-rater reliability of the severity subscale of the original and revised TWSTRS using video recordings.

METHODS

Three raters, a PhD student with a nursing degree, a physiotherapist specialized in CD, and a neurologist-in-training independently rated all videos. The inter-rater reliability was assessed with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

The total severity score of both tools demonstrated a good inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.87 to 0.88). The inter-rater reliability of individual sub-items varied from poor (ICC = 0.29) to excellent (ICC = 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

The total severity score of both TWSTRS showed good inter-rater reliability in a multidisciplinary team, indicating their applicability for online patients' assessment. We recommend using the total subscale for outcome comparison. Furthermore, there is a need for more accurate definitions of duration factor and shoulder elevation.

摘要

背景

多伦多西部痉挛性斜颈评定量表(TWSTRS)被广泛用于颈部肌张力障碍(CD)的评估。

目的

使用视频记录评估原始版和修订版TWSTRS严重程度子量表的评分者间信度。

方法

三名评分者,一名拥有护理学位的博士生、一名专门从事CD治疗的物理治疗师和一名实习神经科医生,独立对所有视频进行评分。采用组内相关系数(ICC)评估评分者间信度。

结果

两种工具的总严重程度评分均显示出良好的评分者间信度(ICC = 0.87至0.88)。各个子项目的评分者间信度从较差(ICC = 0.29)到优秀(ICC = 0.9)不等。

结论

TWSTRS的总严重程度评分在多学科团队中显示出良好的评分者间信度,表明它们适用于在线患者评估。我们建议使用总子量表进行结果比较。此外,需要对持续时间因素和肩部抬高进行更准确的定义。

相似文献

2
Botulinum toxin type B for cervical dystonia.用于治疗颈部肌张力障碍的B型肉毒毒素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 13;2016(5):CD004315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004315.pub3.
4
Botulinum toxin type B for cervical dystonia.用于治疗颈部肌张力障碍的B型肉毒毒素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25(1):CD004315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004315.pub2.
5
Botulinum toxin type A therapy for cervical dystonia.A型肉毒毒素治疗颈部肌张力障碍
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 12;12(12):CD003633. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003633.pub3.

本文引用的文献

5
It's tricky: Rating alleviating maneuvers in cervical dystonia.评价颈部肌张力障碍的缓解动作很棘手。
J Neurol Sci. 2020 Dec 15;419:117205. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117205. Epub 2020 Nov 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验