Effectiveness of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation with index-guided ablation compared to very-high-power, short-duration ablation: A retrospective single-center study.

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation treatment. First-pass pulmonary vein isolation is defined as isolation achieved with only a single lesion in every part of the isolation lines.

AIMS

The primary aim was to assess the frequency of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation after ablation index-guided (AI) and very-high-power, short-duration (vHPSD) ablation. The secondary goals were to detect areas of additional lesions and the correlation between them and used methods and to access efficiency of the procedure.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center study, we included 105 consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Based on the operators' decisions, 51 patients underwent AI-guided, and 54 patients underwent vHPSD ablation. The ipsilateral pulmonary veins were divided into four areas, and the anatomical region and several additional applications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Bilateral first-pass pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 34.3% of patients, with no significant difference between AI-guided and vHPSD ablation (37.0% vs. 31.4%; P = 0.68). In both groups, the most common region of additional applications was the posterior part of the right-sided carina (AI: 25.5% [13/51] vs. vHPSD: 25.9% [14/54]; P = 0.89). There was a significant difference (P = 0.049) between techniques in the highest frequency of additional applications in the left-sided pulmonary veins: in the anterior part of the carina (AI: 15.7% vs. vHPSD: 7.4%) and the posterior part of the carina (AI: 5.9% vs. vHSPD: 22.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Lesions made with AI-guided and vHPSD protocols differed in areas of additional applications, which was most significant in the left-sided pulmonary veins.