Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas.
University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Anesthesiology. 2024 Nov 1;141(5):835-848. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005164.
During the past 70 years, patient safety science has evolved through four organizational frameworks known as Safety-0, Safety -1, Safety-2, and Safety-3. Their evolution reflects the realization over time that blaming people, chasing errors, fixing one-offs, and regulation would not create the desired patient safety. In Safety-0, the oldest framework, harm events arise from clinician failure; event prevention relies on better staffing, education, and basic standards. In Safety-1, used by hospitals, harm events arise from individual and/or system failures. Safety is improved through analytics, workplace culture, high reliability principles, technology, and quality improvement. Safety-2 emphasizes clinicians' adaptability to prevent harm events in an everchanging environment, using resilience engineering principles. Safety-3, used by aviation, adds system design and control elements to Safety-1 and Safety-2, deploying human factors, design-thinking, and operational control or feedback to prevent and respond to harm events. Safety-3 represents a potential way for anesthesia and perioperative care to become safer.
在过去的 70 年中,患者安全科学经历了四个组织框架的发展,分别称为 Safety-0、Safety-1、Safety-2 和 Safety-3。它们的发展反映了随着时间的推移人们逐渐认识到,仅仅归咎于个人、追查错误、解决一次性问题和实施监管并不能实现预期的患者安全目标。在最古老的 Safety-0 框架中,伤害事件源于临床医生的失误;事件预防依赖于更好的人员配置、教育和基本标准。在医院使用的 Safety-1 中,伤害事件源于个人和/或系统的失误。通过分析、工作场所文化、高可靠性原则、技术和质量改进来提高安全性。Safety-2 强调临床医生的适应能力,以使用弹性工程原则防止不断变化的环境中的伤害事件。航空业使用的 Safety-3 为 Safety-1 和 Safety-2 添加了系统设计和控制要素,部署了人为因素、设计思维和运营控制或反馈,以预防和应对伤害事件。Safety-3 为麻醉和围手术期护理的安全性提供了一种潜在的改进方式。