• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predicting criminal offence in adolescents who exhibit antisocial behaviour: a machine learning study using data from a large randomised controlled trial of multisystemic therapy.预测表现出反社会行为的青少年的刑事犯罪:一项使用多系统疗法大型随机对照试验数据的机器学习研究。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 May;34(5):1579-1588. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02592-7. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
2
Multisystemic therapy versus management as usual in the treatment of adolescent antisocial behaviour (START): 5-year follow-up of a pragmatic, randomised, controlled, superiority trial.多系统疗法与常规管理治疗青少年反社会行为的对照研究(START):一项实用、随机、对照、优效性试验的5年随访
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 May;7(5):420-430. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30131-0.
3
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
4
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
5
Evaluation of multisystemic therapy pilot services in the Systemic Therapy for At Risk Teens (START) trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估高危青少年系统治疗(START)试验中多系统治疗试点服务:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2013 Aug 20;14:265. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-265.
6
Mentalisation-based treatment for antisocial personality disorder in males convicted of an offence on community probation in England and Wales (Mentalization for Offending Adult Males, MOAM): a multicentre, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial.针对在英格兰和威尔士因犯罪而处于社区缓刑期的成年男性反社会人格障碍的基于心理化的治疗(成年犯罪男性的心理化治疗,MOAM):一项多中心、评估者盲法、随机对照试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;12(3):208-219. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00445-0.
7
A multicomponent psychosocial intervention to reduce substance use by adolescents involved in the criminal justice system: the RISKIT-CJS RCT.一项针对卷入刑事司法系统的青少年减少物质使用的多成分心理社会干预措施:RISKIT-CJS RCT 研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Mar;11(3):1-77. doi: 10.3310/FKPY6814.
8
Development and validation of a prediction model for coronary heart disease risk in depressed patients aged 20 years and older using machine learning algorithms.使用机器学习算法开发并验证针对20岁及以上抑郁症患者冠心病风险的预测模型。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jan 9;11:1504957. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1504957. eCollection 2024.
9
A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study.长期护理机构中老年人身体约束的风险预测模型:机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 6;25:e43815. doi: 10.2196/43815.
10
Predicting the risk of emergency admission with machine learning: Development and validation using linked electronic health records.使用机器学习预测急诊入院风险:基于电子健康记录的开发和验证。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 20;15(11):e1002695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002695. eCollection 2018 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting treatment response using machine learning: A registered report.使用机器学习预测治疗反应:一份注册报告。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2024 Jun;63(2):137-155. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12452. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
2
Machine Learning and Criminal Justice: A Systematic Review of Advanced Methodology for Recidivism Risk Prediction.机器学习与刑事司法:累犯风险预测先进方法的系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 25;19(17):10594. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710594.
3
Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead.停止为高风险决策解释黑箱机器学习模型,转而使用可解释模型。
Nat Mach Intell. 2019 May;1(5):206-215. doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x. Epub 2019 May 13.
4
Multisystemic therapy versus management as usual in the treatment of adolescent antisocial behaviour (START): 5-year follow-up of a pragmatic, randomised, controlled, superiority trial.多系统疗法与常规管理治疗青少年反社会行为的对照研究(START):一项实用、随机、对照、优效性试验的5年随访
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 May;7(5):420-430. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30131-0.
5
Can Machine Learning Improve Screening for Targeted Delinquency Prevention Programs?机器学习能否改善靶向犯罪预防项目的筛查效果?
Prev Sci. 2020 Feb;21(2):158-170. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01040-2.
6
Changes in millennial adolescent mental health and health-related behaviours over 10 years: a population cohort comparison study.千年之交青少年心理健康和相关行为在 10 年内的变化:一项基于人群的队列比较研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Oct 1;48(5):1650-1664. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz006.
7
The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism.预测累犯的准确性、公正性和局限性。
Sci Adv. 2018 Jan 17;4(1):eaao5580. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao5580. eCollection 2018 Jan.
8
Multisystemic therapy versus management as usual in the treatment of adolescent antisocial behaviour (START): a pragmatic, randomised controlled, superiority trial.多系统治疗与常规管理治疗青少年反社会行为的比较(START):一项实用、随机对照的优效性试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;5(2):119-133. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30001-4. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
9
Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.透明报告个体预后或诊断的多变量预测模型(TRIPOD):TRIPOD 声明。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 7;350:g7594. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7594.
10
The age-crime curve in adolescence and early adulthood is not due to age differences in economic status.青少年和成年早期的年龄-犯罪曲线并不是由于经济地位的年龄差异造成的。
J Youth Adolesc. 2013 Jun;42(6):848-60. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9950-4. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

预测表现出反社会行为的青少年的刑事犯罪:一项使用多系统疗法大型随机对照试验数据的机器学习研究。

Predicting criminal offence in adolescents who exhibit antisocial behaviour: a machine learning study using data from a large randomised controlled trial of multisystemic therapy.

作者信息

Suh Jae Won, Saunders Rob, Simes Elizabeth, Delamain Henry, Butler Stephen, Cottrell David, Kraam Abdullah, Scott Stephen, Goodyer Ian M, Wason James, Pilling Stephen, Fonagy Peter

机构信息

CORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 May;34(5):1579-1588. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02592-7. Epub 2024 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00787-024-02592-7
PMID:39377792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12122556/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Accurate prediction of short-term offending in young people exhibiting antisocial behaviour could support targeted interventions. Here we develop a set of machine learning (ML) models that predict offending status with good accuracy; furthermore, we show interpretable ML analyses can complement models to inform clinical decision-making.

METHODS

This study included 679 individuals aged 11-17 years who displayed moderate-to-severe antisocial behaviour, from a controlled trial of Multisystemic-therapy in England. The outcome was any criminal offence in the 18 months after study baseline. Four types of ML algorithms were trained: logistic regression, elastic net regression, random forest, and gradient boosting machine (GBM). Prediction models were developed (1) using predictors readily available to clinicians (e.g. sociodemographics, previous convictions), and (2) with additional information (e.g. parenting). Model agnostic feature importance values were calculated and the most important predictors identified. Nested cross-validation with 100 iterations of random data splits and 10-fold cross-validation within each iteration was employed, and the average predictive performance was reported.

RESULTS

Among the ML models using readily available predictors, the GBM is the strongest model (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.85-0.86); the other models have average AUCs of 0.82. This performance was better than using only the total number of previous offences as the predictor (0.67, 0.66-0.68), and the model simply assuming past offending status as the prediction (0.81, 0.80-0.81). Additional predictors slightly increased the performance of logistic regression and random forest models but decreased the performance of elastic net regression and gradient boosting machine-based models.

CONCLUSION

The potential utility of ML approaches for accurately predicting criminal offences in high-risk youth is demonstrated. Interpretable ML-based predictive models could be utilised in youth services or research to help develop and deliver effective interventions.

摘要

引言

准确预测表现出反社会行为的年轻人的短期犯罪行为,有助于实施有针对性的干预措施。在此,我们开发了一组机器学习(ML)模型,这些模型能以较高的准确率预测犯罪状态;此外,我们还表明,可解释的ML分析能够补充模型,为临床决策提供依据。

方法

本研究纳入了679名年龄在11至17岁之间、表现出中度至重度反社会行为的个体,这些个体来自英国多系统疗法的一项对照试验。研究结果为研究基线后18个月内的任何刑事犯罪。训练了四种类型的ML算法:逻辑回归、弹性网络回归、随机森林和梯度提升机(GBM)。开发预测模型时,(1)使用临床医生容易获得的预测因素(如社会人口统计学、既往定罪情况),(2)结合额外信息(如育儿情况)。计算了与模型无关的特征重要性值,并确定了最重要的预测因素。采用了100次随机数据分割的嵌套交叉验证以及每次迭代中的10折交叉验证,并报告了平均预测性能。

结果

在使用易于获得的预测因素的ML模型中,GBM是最强的模型(曲线下面积[AUC]为0.85,95%置信区间[CI]为0.85 - 0.86);其他模型的平均AUC为0.82。这一性能优于仅使用既往犯罪总数作为预测因素的情况(0.67,0.66 - 0.68),以及简单假设过去犯罪状态作为预测的模型(0.81,0.80 - 0.81)。额外的预测因素略微提高了逻辑回归和随机森林模型的性能,但降低了弹性网络回归和基于梯度提升机的模型的性能。

结论

证明了ML方法在准确预测高危青少年犯罪方面的潜在效用。基于ML的可解释预测模型可用于青少年服务或研究,以帮助制定和实施有效的干预措施。