Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Dec;180:47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.040. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
Compulsive skin-picking is associated with emotion regulation difficulties, whose origins remain unclear. Interoception, plays an important role in effective emotion regulation. This study examined the relationship between interoception, emotion regulation strategies, and skin-picking in 136 individuals (85% women, aged 18-41), including 71 engaging in skin-picking and 65 psychologically healthy controls. We were interested in between-group differences in maladaptive and adaptive emotion regulation and aspects of interoception as well as associations of the latter with skin-picking symptoms and use of emotion regulation strategies. At baseline, we assessed habitual emotion regulation strategies (rumination, suppression, distraction, engagement, arousal control, reappraisal) and Interoceptive Sensibility (e.g., emotional awareness, body listening, self-regulation, noticing) through self-report questionnaires. Moreover, Interoceptive Accuracy (IAc) was measured via a Heartbeat Counting Task. Additionally, Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) over seven days was used to register use of emotion regulation strategies and the occurrence and severity of skin-picking episodes during that period. At baseline, the skin-picking group exhibited lower IAc, emotional awareness, and higher habitual use of rumination than control group. Lower IAc was associated with higher odds of reporting skin-picking episodes assessed during EMA. Body listening correlated with a reduced sense of control over skin-picking during EMA. In total sample, self-regulation was related to lower odds of using rumination during EMA and noticing with less use of cognitive reappraisal. The study highlights the complex relationship between interoception, emotion regulation, and skin-picking, offering new insights into the mechanisms underlying skin picking disorder.
强迫性皮肤搔抓与情绪调节困难有关,但其起源尚不清楚。内感受在有效的情绪调节中起着重要作用。本研究调查了 136 名个体(85%为女性,年龄 18-41 岁)的内感受、情绪调节策略与皮肤搔抓之间的关系,其中 71 人存在皮肤搔抓行为,65 人为心理健康对照者。我们感兴趣的是两组之间在适应性和不适应的情绪调节策略以及内感受方面的差异,以及后者与皮肤搔抓症状和情绪调节策略的使用之间的关联。在基线时,我们通过自我报告问卷评估了习惯性情绪调节策略(反刍、抑制、分心、参与、唤醒控制、再评价)和内感受敏感性(例如,情绪意识、身体倾听、自我调节、注意)。此外,还通过心跳计数任务测量了内感受准确性(IAc)。此外,在七天内进行了生态瞬时评估(EMA),以记录在此期间情绪调节策略的使用以及皮肤搔抓发作的发生和严重程度。在基线时,皮肤搔抓组的 IAc、情绪意识低于对照组,习惯性反刍的使用高于对照组。较低的 IAc 与在 EMA 中报告皮肤搔抓发作的几率增加相关。身体倾听与 EMA 中对皮肤搔抓控制感降低相关。在总样本中,自我调节与 EMA 中反刍使用频率降低和注意与认知再评价使用频率降低相关。该研究强调了内感受、情绪调节和皮肤搔抓之间的复杂关系,为皮肤搔抓障碍的发病机制提供了新的见解。