Castro María Del Mar, Del Castillo Alejandra María, Castillo Ruth Mabel, Cossio Alexandra, Castaño Grajales Patricia, Gutiérrez Yeison, Alexander Neal
Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas (CIDEIM), Cali, Colombia.
Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024 Oct 8;111(6):1206-1214. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.24-0367. Print 2024 Dec 4.
The effectiveness of treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in rural settings remains underexplored. This study assessed the effectiveness of standard antileishmanial treatments using a community-based approach supported by mobile health (mHealth) in three rural areas of Colombia. From January 2018 to September 2021, we assessed treatment outcomes, adherence, and adverse drug reactions in CL patients, with the support of the Guaral+ST app. Treatment decisions were made by providers at health facilities at each site in accordance with national guidelines, whereas treatment follow-up and presumptive case identification were made by trained community leaders and health agents at the community level. In total, 231 participants received antileishmanial treatment (63 received miltefosine, 110 meglumine antimoniate, and 58 pentamidine). Disease presentation was mild (median number of lesions = 1, interquartile range [IQR]: 1-2) and of short duration (1.5 months, IQR: 1-3). The strategy yielded information on the therapeutic outcomes in 81% of study participants. Effectiveness, measured as the proportion of cure at 90 to 180 days, was 86.3% (95% CI: 73.3-93.48) for miltefosine; 77.6% (67.5-85.3) for meglumine antimoniate, and 73.1% (59.0-83.6) for pentamidine. The effectiveness of pentamidine in children ≤10 years old was 79.4% (61.6-90.3). This is one of the few reports of effectiveness of pentamidine in children with prospective data collection in the Americas. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 32% of patients, most frequently with meglumine antimoniate. Our findings demonstrate that standard antileishmanial treatments are effective in rural areas where the disease is endemic and that mHealth has a pivotal role in improving patient follow-up and data collection on therapeutic outcomes.
在农村地区,皮肤利什曼病(CL)的治疗效果仍未得到充分探索。本研究评估了在哥伦比亚三个农村地区采用移动健康(mHealth)支持的基于社区的方法进行标准抗利什曼治疗的效果。2018年1月至2021年9月,在Guaral+ST应用程序的支持下,我们评估了CL患者的治疗结果、依从性和药物不良反应。治疗决策由每个地点的医疗机构的提供者根据国家指南做出,而治疗随访和疑似病例识别则由经过培训的社区领袖和社区层面的卫生人员进行。共有231名参与者接受了抗利什曼治疗(63人接受了米替福新,110人接受了葡甲胺锑酸盐,58人接受了喷他脒)。疾病表现较轻(病变中位数=1,四分位间距[IQR]:1-2)且病程较短(1.5个月,IQR:1-3)。该策略在81%的研究参与者中获得了治疗结果信息。以90至180天的治愈率衡量的有效性,米替福新为86.3%(95%CI:73.3-93.48);葡甲胺锑酸盐为77.6%(67.5-85.3),喷他脒为73.1%(59.0-83.6)。喷他脒在≤10岁儿童中的有效性为79.4%(61.6-90.3)。这是美洲少数几篇有前瞻性数据收集的关于喷他脒在儿童中有效性的报告之一。32%的患者出现了药物不良反应,最常见于葡甲胺锑酸盐。我们的研究结果表明,标准抗利什曼治疗在该疾病流行的农村地区是有效的,并且mHealth在改善患者随访和治疗结果数据收集方面具有关键作用。