Tuon Felipe Francisco, Amato Valdir Sabbaga, Graf Maria Esther, Siqueira Andre Machado, Nicodemo Antonio Carlos, Amato Neto Vicente
Department of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Infectious and Parasitic Clinic, and Laboratory of Medical Investigation - Parasitology (LIM 46), Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Int J Dermatol. 2008 Feb;47(2):109-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2008.03417.x.
BACKGROUND: New World leishmaniasis is an important endemic disease and public health problem in developing countries. The increase in ecologic tourism has extended this problem to developed countries. Few drugs have emerged over the past 50 years, and drug resistance has increased, such that the cure rate is no better than 80% in large studies. Despite these data, there has been no systematic review with a meta-analysis of the therapy used in this important tropical disease. The aim of this study was to determine the best drug management in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Latin America based on the best studies published in the medical literature. METHODS: MEDLINE, LILACS, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify articles related to CL and therapy. Articles with adequate data on cure and treatment failure, internal and external validity information, and more than four patients in each treatment arm were included. RESULTS: Fifty-four articles met our inclusion criteria and 12 were included in the meta-analysis. Pentavalent antimonials were the most studied drugs, with a total of 1150 patients, achieving a cure rate of 76.5%. The cure rate of pentamidine was similar to that of pentavalent antimonials. Other drugs showed variable results, and all demonstrated an inferior response. CONCLUSION: Although pentavalent antimonials are the drugs of choice in the treatment of CL, pentamidine showed similar results. Nevertheless, several aspects, such as cost, adverse effects, local experience, and availability of drugs to treat CL, must be considered when determining the best management of this disease, especially in developing countries where resources are scarce.
背景:新大陆利什曼病是发展中国家的一种重要地方病和公共卫生问题。生态旅游的增加已将这一问题扩展到发达国家。在过去50年中出现的药物很少,而且耐药性有所增加,以至于在大型研究中治愈率不超过80%。尽管有这些数据,但尚未对这种重要热带病的治疗方法进行系统评价和荟萃分析。本研究的目的是根据医学文献中发表的最佳研究,确定拉丁美洲皮肤利什曼病(CL)治疗的最佳药物管理方法。 方法:检索MEDLINE、LILACS、EMBASE、科学网和考克兰图书馆数据库,以识别与CL和治疗相关的文章。纳入那些在治愈和治疗失败方面有充分数据、具有内部和外部有效性信息且每个治疗组有超过4名患者的文章。 结果:54篇文章符合我们的纳入标准,12篇被纳入荟萃分析。五价锑剂是研究最多的药物,共有1150名患者,治愈率为76.5%。喷他脒的治愈率与五价锑剂相似。其他药物的结果各不相同,且均显示疗效较差。 结论:虽然五价锑剂是治疗CL的首选药物,但喷他脒显示出相似的结果。然而,在确定这种疾病的最佳管理方法时,必须考虑几个方面,如成本、不良反应、当地经验以及治疗CL的药物供应情况,特别是在资源稀缺的发展中国家。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-11-17
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Health Technol Assess. 2024-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025-1-3
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024-2-8
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022-10-7
Parasitol Res. 2022-11
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022-10-12