Horowitz Jeanne M, Lopes Vendrami Camila, Velichko Yuri S, Green-Walker Aja I, Kelahan Linda C, Jawahar Anugayathri, Barber Emma L, Shanes Elisheva D, Miller Frank H, Recht Hannah S
From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2025;49(1):57-63. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001656. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
The aim of the study is to assess the validity of a recently published consensus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnostic algorithm for differentiating degenerating leiomyomas from uterine sarcomas and other atypical appearing uterine malignancies.
Atypical uterine masses on pelvic MRI were identified using a radiology report search engine and teaching files with the keywords "atypical leiomyoma," "atypical fibroid," and "sarcoma." All cases were pathology-proven. Two radiologists blinded to clinical, surgical, and pathologic reports retrospectively and independently reviewed 40 pelvic MRI examinations dated 1/2007-9/2022 to determine whether the masses appeared benign or malignant, using the 2022 consensus atypical uterine mass flow chart. Imaging features assessed included intermediate/high signal intensity (SI) at T2-weighted imaging, high diffusion weighted imaging SI (equal or higher SI than endometrium or lymph nodes on high b value imaging), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value ≤0.905 × 10 -3 mm 2 /s, peritoneal metastases, and abnormal lymph nodes.
Among the 40 atypical uterine mass cases reviewed, 24 masses were benign (22 leiomyomas, 1 adenomyoma, and 1 borderline ovarian tumor) and 16 masses were malignant (6 leiomyosarcomas, 6 carcinosarcomas, 2 endometrial stromal sarcomas, 1 high-grade adenosarcoma, and 1 low-grade uterine sarcoma). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of whether a mass was benign or malignant were 75%, 95.8%, 92.3%, and 85% for reader 1, and 81.2%, 91.7%, 86.7%, and 88% for reader 2, respectively. Interrater agreement was strong, with a kappa statistic of 0.89. When excluding nonleiomyosarcoma uterine malignancies, sensitivity and negative predictive value improved to 100%.
The new consensus pelvic MRI algorithm for evaluating atypical uterine masses has good specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for determining malignancy, particularly for uterine sarcomas that are leiomyosarcomas. However, if ADC value is near but not below 0.905 × 10 -3 mm 2 /s, the mass may still be malignant, especially if a b value lower than 1000 is used. If the atypical uterine mass is predominantly endometrial, morphological features on T2 and postgadolinium sequences should guide suspicion, as some atypical appearing nonleiomyosarcoma uterine malignancies may have an ADC value greater than 0.905 × 10 -3 mm 2 /s.
本研究旨在评估最近发表的一种共识性磁共振成像(MRI)诊断算法,用于区分退行性平滑肌瘤与子宫肉瘤及其他表现不典型的子宫恶性肿瘤的有效性。
使用放射学报告搜索引擎和教学文件,通过关键词“非典型平滑肌瘤”“非典型纤维瘤”和“肉瘤”来识别盆腔MRI上的非典型子宫肿块。所有病例均经病理证实。两名对临床、手术和病理报告不知情的放射科医生,回顾性且独立地审查了2007年1月至2022年9月期间的40份盆腔MRI检查,使用2022年共识性非典型子宫肿块流程图来确定肿块表现为良性还是恶性。评估的影像特征包括T2加权成像上的中等/高信号强度(SI)、扩散加权成像高SI(在高b值成像上SI等于或高于子宫内膜或淋巴结)、表观扩散系数(ADC)值≤0.905×10⁻³mm²/s、腹膜转移和异常淋巴结。
在审查的40例非典型子宫肿块病例中,24例肿块为良性(22例平滑肌瘤、1例子宫腺肌病和1例交界性卵巢肿瘤),16例肿块为恶性(6例平滑肌肉瘤、6例癌肉瘤、2例子宫内膜间质肉瘤、1例高级别腺肉瘤和1例低级别子宫肉瘤)。读者1判断肿块为良性或恶性的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为75%、95.8%、92.3%和85%,读者2分别为81.2%、91.7%、86.7%和88%。评分者间一致性较强,kappa统计值为0.89。排除非平滑肌肉瘤的子宫恶性肿瘤后,敏感性和阴性预测值提高到100%。
用于评估非典型子宫肿块的新的共识性盆腔MRI算法在确定恶性肿瘤方面具有良好的特异性、敏感性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,特别是对于平滑肌肉瘤类型的子宫肉瘤。然而,如果ADC值接近但不低于0.905×10⁻³mm²/s,肿块仍可能是恶性的,特别是如果使用低于1000的b值。如果非典型子宫肿块主要为子宫内膜来源,T2加权和钆增强序列上的形态学特征应指导怀疑,因为一些表现不典型的非平滑肌肉瘤子宫恶性肿瘤的ADC值可能大于0.905×10⁻³mm²/s。