Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Dec;41(12):2466-2475. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0909-2.
The purpose of the study was to assess the diagnostic performance of qualitative and quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian and uterine masses.
Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, with waiver of informed consent. DWI MRIs of 222 women acquired over 1.5 years were evaluated. Reference standard was pathology or follow-up imaging. For qualitative assessment, two radiologists independently reviewed DWI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images for diffusion restriction. Differences were resolved by consensus. For quantitative assessment, a single reader measured ADC values. Readers were blinded to the reference standard.
222 lesions, 121 ovarian (99 benign and 22 malignant) and 101 uterine (54 benign and 47 malignant), were included. Final diagnosis was established with pathology in 129 (58%) or with imaging follow-up in 93 (42%). Mean (range) follow-up interval was 27 (13-48) months. Qualitative assessment yielded sensitivity (ratio, 95% CI), specificity, PPV and NPV of 100% (22/22, 85-100), 68% (68/99, 58-76), 41% (22/54, 27-54), and 100% (68/68, 94-100) for ovarian and 94% (44/47, 83-98), 91% (49/54, 80-96), 90% (44/49, 78-95) and 94% (49/52, 84-98) for uterine malignancies. ADC (mean ± SD) between benign ovarian [(1.11 ± 0.76) × 10 mm/s] vs. malignant [(0.71 ± 0.26) × 10 mm/s] lesions was significantly different (p < 0.001). ADC cutoff value of 1.55 × 10 mm/s for ovarian lesions resulted in 99.9% confidence for the absence of malignancy. ADC (mean ± SD) of benign uterine [(0.64 ± 0.38) × 10 mm/s] vs. malignant [(0.68 ± 0.19) × 10 mm/s] lesions was not significantly different (P < 0.54).
Quantitative and qualitative DWI assessment can be used to confidently characterize a subset of ovarian lesions as benign. With uterine lesions, although DWI is useful in differentiating benign from malignant lesions, the technique does not allow for definitive quantitative characterization.
本研究旨在评估定性和定量扩散加权成像(DWI)在鉴别卵巢和子宫良恶性肿块方面的诊断性能。
本 HIPAA 合规性回顾性研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准,并豁免了知情同意。评估了在 1.5 年期间采集的 222 名女性的 DWI MRI。参考标准为病理学或随访影像学。定性评估方面,两位放射科医生独立评估 DWI 和表观扩散系数(ADC)图像以判断弥散受限情况。通过共识解决差异。定量评估方面,一位读者测量 ADC 值。读者对参考标准不知情。
共纳入 222 个病灶,其中 121 个为卵巢(99 个良性和 22 个恶性),101 个为子宫(54 个良性和 47 个恶性)。最终诊断通过病理学检查确定了 129 例(58%),通过影像学随访确定了 93 例(42%)。平均(范围)随访间隔为 27(13-48)个月。定性评估的敏感性(比值,95%CI)、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 100%(22/22,85-100)、68%(68/99,58-76)、41%(22/54,27-54)和 100%(68/68,94-100),对卵巢病变;94%(44/47,83-98)、91%(49/54,80-96)、90%(44/49,78-95)和 94%(49/52,84-98)对子宫恶性肿瘤。良性卵巢病变的 ADC(均值±标准差)为[(1.11±0.76)×10mm/s],而恶性卵巢病变的 ADC 为[(0.71±0.26)×10mm/s],两者差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。对于卵巢病变,ADC 截断值为 1.55×10mm/s 时,恶性肿瘤的置信度为 99.9%。良性子宫病变的 ADC(均值±标准差)为[(0.64±0.38)×10mm/s],而恶性子宫病变的 ADC 为[(0.68±0.19)×10mm/s],两者差异无统计学意义(P<0.54)。
定量和定性 DWI 评估可用于自信地将卵巢病变的一部分特征为良性。对于子宫病变,尽管 DWI 有助于区分良性和恶性病变,但该技术无法进行明确的定量特征描述。