Suppr超能文献

长时间输注后右美托咪定撤药及处理的评估

Evaluation of Dexmedetomidine Withdrawal and Management After Prolonged Infusion.

作者信息

Kim Christine S, McLaughlin Kevin C, Romero Natasha, Crowley Kaitlin E

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2024 Dec;46(12):1034-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.09.006. Epub 2024 Oct 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Dexmedetomidine is often used for longer than its labeled indication of 24 hours, raising concerns for potential withdrawal. Data are limited regarding this syndrome in adult patients. This study aimed to further characterize dexmedetomidine withdrawal in critically ill adult patients after prolonged use.

METHODS

This was an institutional review board-exempt, single-center, retrospective chart review conducted at a tertiary academic medical center. Adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients on dexmedetomidine for ≥72 hours in 2019 were screened for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were interruption of dexmedetomidine for >6 hours, indications for dexmedetomidine other than sedation, or patients with neurological or burn injury. The major end point was the incidence of dexmedetomidine withdrawal, defined as meeting ≥2 of the following criteria within 24 hours of discontinuation: newly positive Confusion Assessment Method for ICU, Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale score of ≥+2, hypertension, and tachycardia. Minor end points were incidence of individual withdrawal signs as previously described, additional sedatives or antipsychotics required, dose and duration of dexmedetomidine infusion, length of ventilation, ICU and hospital length of stay, and new onset of the following: fever, vomiting, loose stools/diarrhea, diaphoresis, or seizure.

FINDINGS

Of the 152 patients included, dexmedetomidine withdrawal occurred in 54 patients (35.5%). Rebound hypertension was the most common withdrawal sign (47 patients [87.0%]). In the withdrawal group, significantly more patients required additional β-blockers (29 [53.7%] vs 10 [10.2%]; P < 0.01), were reinitiated on dexmedetomidine (16 [29.6%] vs 10 [10.2%]; P < 0.01), and required a start or increased dose of clonidine (6 [11.1%] vs 3 [3.1%]; P = 0.04). There was no significant difference in the cumulative dose or duration of dexmedetomidine between the groups. Length of ventilation was longer in the withdrawal group (171 hours [83.7-280.8 hours] vs 159 hours [149.0-335.7 hours]; P < 0.01), but there was no difference in ICU or hospital length of stay.

IMPLICATIONS

Prolonged use of dexmedetomidine was associated with withdrawal syndrome in 35.5% of patients in our study. Larger trials are needed to confirm the risk factors for dexmedetomidine withdrawal and identify measures to prevent withdrawal.

摘要

目的

右美托咪定的使用时间常常超过其标注的24小时适应证时长,这引发了对潜在撤药反应的担忧。关于成年患者中这种综合征的数据有限。本研究旨在进一步描述重症成年患者长期使用右美托咪定后的撤药反应特征。

方法

这是一项在三级学术医疗中心进行的、经机构审查委员会豁免的单中心回顾性病历审查。对2019年使用右美托咪定≥72小时的成年重症监护病房(ICU)患者进行筛选以纳入研究。排除标准为右美托咪定中断使用>6小时、右美托咪定用于镇静以外的适应证,或患有神经损伤或烧伤的患者。主要终点是右美托咪定撤药反应的发生率,定义为在停药后24小时内符合以下标准中的≥2条:新出现的ICU意识模糊评估方法阳性、里士满躁动镇静量表评分≥+2、高血压和心动过速。次要终点是如前所述的个体撤药体征的发生率、所需额外的镇静剂或抗精神病药物、右美托咪定输注的剂量和持续时间、通气时长、ICU住院时间和住院时间,以及以下情况的新发生:发热、呕吐、稀便/腹泻、多汗或癫痫发作。

研究结果

在纳入的152例患者中,54例(35.5%)出现了右美托咪定撤药反应。反跳性高血压是最常见的撤药体征(47例[87.0%])。在撤药组中,显著更多患者需要额外使用β受体阻滞剂(29例[53.7%]对10例[10.2%];P<0.01),重新开始使用右美托咪定(16例[29.6%]对10例[10.2%];P<0.01),并且需要开始使用或增加可乐定剂量(6例[11.1%]对3例[3.1%];P=0.04)。两组之间右美托咪定的累积剂量或持续时间没有显著差异。撤药组的通气时长更长(171小时[83.7 - 280.8小时]对159小时[149.0 - 335.7小时];P<0.01),但ICU住院时间或住院时间没有差异。

结论

在我们的研究中,35.5%的患者长期使用右美托咪定与撤药综合征相关。需要更大规模的试验来确认右美托咪定撤药反应的危险因素并确定预防撤药的措施。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验