Genetic determinants of antidepressant and antipsychotic drug response.

Today, more than 90% of inpatients hospitalized with Major Depression or Schizophrenia are treated with psychotropic drugs. Since none of the treatment options is causal, response rates are modest and the course of recovery is very heterogeneous. Genetic studies on the etiology and pathogenesis of major psychiatric disorders over the past decades have been largely unsuccessful. Likewise, genetic studies to predict response to psychopharmacological treatment have also not been particularly successful. In this project we have recruited 902 inpatients with ICD-10 diagnoses of schizophrenic ("F2 patients") or depressive disorders ("F3 patients"). The study assessed today's acute inpatient treatment regimens with up to 8 repeated measurements regarding the time course of recovery and adverse side effects. The genotyping included 100 candidate genes with genotypic patterns computed from 549 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs). To predict response to psychopharmacological treatment, we relied on a multidimensional approach to analyzing genetic diversity in combination with multilayer Neural Nets (NNs). Central to this new method were the "gene vectors" that (1) assessed the multidimensional genotypic patterns observed with genes; and (2) evaluated the correlations between genes. By means of these methods, we searched for combinations of multidimensional genotypic patterns that were characteristic of treatment responders while being rare among non-responders. The chosen method of approach provided a powerful technique to detail the complex structures of SNP data that are not detectable by conventional association methods. Molecular-genetic NNs enabled correct classification of 100% "non-responders", along with 94.7% correctly classified "responders" among the F2 patients, and 82.6% correctly classified "responders" among the F3 patients. The F2 and F3 classifiers were not disjoint but showed an overlap of 29.6% and 35.7% between the diagnostic groups, thus indicating that clinical diagnoses may not constitute etiologic entities. Our results suggested that patients may have an unspecific physical-genetic disposition that enables, facilitates, impedes or prevents recovery from major psychiatric disorders by setting various thresholds for exogenous triggers that initiate improvement ("recovery disposition"). Even though this disposition is not causally linked to recovery, it can nonetheless be clinically used in the sense of a "surrogate". Indeed, clinicians are also interested in reliable tools that can "do the job", despite the fact that etiology and pathogenesis of the treated disorders remain unknown.