School of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Department of Psychology, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):2733. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20167-8.
Teachers experienced increased stressors and stress during the initial onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. While many educators returned to in-person instruction in the 2021-2022 school year, they faced changing job demands and stressors which has important implications for educator well-being. We sought to understand the stressors and health impacts faced by U.S. educators in the 2021-2022 school year, two years following the acute phase of the pandemic.
Thirty-four certified educators based in Connecticut, USA participated in four virtual focus groups in February 2022. A semi-structured focus group script, designed by the research team and guided by the job demands-resources model, was administered to understand stressors and stress impacts. Data were transcribed and analyzed using the constant comparative method to identify themes and sub-themes. Themes were summarized based on how many participants mentioned them.
Analysis of the qualitative data yielded three themes concerning the well-being impacts of stress: physical health and health behaviors, psychological health, and relationships and social well-being behaviors. The majority of educators indicated impacts in these domains with 76% indicating impacts on physical health and health behaviors (e.g. poor sleep, physical exhaustion, lack of exercise, unhealthy eating), 62% indicating impacts on psychological health (e.g. emotional exhaustion, anxiety, negative self-evaluation); and 68% indicating impacts on relationships social well-being behaviors (e.g. connections with family or friends, connections with others, relationships with coworkers). The majority (94%) of educators indicated that stressors from the school or district with the majority (91%) citing stressors related to protocols/expectations (e.g. excessive or increased demands, insufficient or decreased resources) and some (38%) administrators. Over half (62%) indicated personal stressors including personal/home life (41%), high personal expectations (18%), and income (18%). Some (35%) indicated either the pandemic (26%) or safety concerns (9%) were stressors. Some (24%) cited students' parents as a stressor and a few indicated community (12%), students (12%), and state or national level (9%) stressors.
Educator well-being continued to be impacted in the post-pandemic era. Targeted interventions are needed to reduce school and district-related demands and to address stress-related educator well-being.
教师在 COVID-19 大流行初期经历了更多的压力源和压力。虽然许多教育工作者在 2021-2022 学年重返面授教学,但他们面临着不断变化的工作要求和压力源,这对教育工作者的健康有着重要影响。我们试图了解美国教育工作者在 2021-2022 学年所面临的压力源和健康影响,这是大流行急性阶段之后的第二年。
2022 年 2 月,34 名在美国康涅狄格州的认证教育工作者参加了四次虚拟焦点小组。半结构式焦点小组脚本由研究团队设计,并以工作要求-资源模型为指导,旨在了解压力源和压力的影响。数据经过转录和分析,采用恒定性比较方法来确定主题和子主题。根据有多少参与者提到这些主题,对主题进行了总结。
对定性数据的分析产生了三个与压力对幸福感的影响有关的主题:身体健康和健康行为、心理健康以及人际关系和社会幸福感行为。大多数教育工作者表示在这些领域受到了影响,其中 76%表示身体健康和健康行为受到影响(例如睡眠不佳、身体疲惫、缺乏运动、不健康饮食),62%表示心理健康受到影响(例如情绪疲惫、焦虑、自我评价消极);68%表示人际关系和社会幸福感行为受到影响(例如与家人或朋友的联系、与他人的联系、与同事的关系)。大多数(94%)教育工作者表示学校或地区的压力源主要来自于(91%)与协议/期望相关的压力源(例如过多或增加的需求,资源不足或减少),还有一些(38%)来自于管理者。超过一半(62%)的教育工作者表示存在个人压力源,包括个人/家庭生活(41%)、个人期望过高(18%)和收入(18%)。有些人(35%)表示,大流行(26%)或安全问题(9%)是压力源。有些人(24%)将学生家长视为压力源,少数人表示社区(12%)、学生(12%)和州或国家层面(9%)也是压力源。
在大流行后时代,教育工作者的幸福感仍受到影响。需要采取有针对性的干预措施,以减少学校和地区相关的需求,并解决与压力相关的教育工作者的幸福感问题。