Suppr超能文献

不同的胆道癌,相同的手术:肿瘤起源对侵犯肝门部肿瘤患者的重要性。

Different biliary tract cancers, same operation: Importance of cancer origin in patients with hilar-invading tumors.

作者信息

Ahmad Al-Saffar Hasan, Jansson Hannes, Danielsson Olof, Moro Carlos F, Sturesson Christian

机构信息

Division of Surgery Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC) Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels alle 8, Huddinge 141 52, Sverige.

Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Surg. 2025 Mar;114(1):35-43. doi: 10.1177/14574969241282480. Epub 2024 Oct 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

For patients with biliary tract cancer involving the hepatic hilum, major hepatic resection with extrahepatic bile duct resection may be required. In addition to perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC), the same extent of surgery is used in advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) with hilar involvement. Few studies compare prognostic factors and long-term outcomes across tumor types. This study compared risk characteristics and outcomes after surgery in all subtypes of biliary tract cancer with hilar involvement.

METHODS

Patients with biliary tract cancer with hilar involvement undergoing major liver resection and extrahepatic bile duct resection between 2011 and 2021 at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The primary postoperative outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were recurrence-free survival and postoperative complications. Survival analysis was performed with Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

One-hundred and eight patients were included. Seventy-three (67%) had PHCC, 24 (22%) had GBC, and 11 (10%) had IHCC. Hilar-invading IHCC and GBC had more adverse histopathological factors like lymph node positivity (p = 0.021), higher number of positive nodes (p = 0.043), and larger tumor size (p < 0.001) compared with PHCC. Peritoneal invasion and lymph node positivity were significant independent predictors for survival (p = 0.011 and p = 0.004, respectively). Median overall survival was 29 months for PHCC, 22 months for GBC and 21 months for IHCC (p = 0.53). IHCC tended to recur earlier (p = 0.046) than GBC and PHCC (6, 15, and 18 months, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients with biliary tract cancer with hilar involvement undergoing major liver resection and resection of extrahepatic bile ducts had similar overall survival regardless of subtype, while IHCC recurred earlier. Peritoneal cancer invasion was common in all subtypes, including PHCC, and was an independent prognostic factor. This finding may support routine reporting of peritoneal invasion-status in resected biliary tract cancer.

摘要

背景与目的

对于肝门部受累的胆管癌患者,可能需要进行肝大部切除术及肝外胆管切除术。除肝门部胆管癌(PHCC)外,相同范围的手术也用于晚期胆囊癌(GBC)和累及肝门的肝内胆管癌(IHCC)。很少有研究比较不同肿瘤类型的预后因素和长期结局。本研究比较了所有累及肝门的胆管癌亚型手术后的风险特征和结局。

方法

回顾性分析2011年至2021年在单中心接受肝大部切除术及肝外胆管切除术的累及肝门的胆管癌患者。主要术后结局为总生存期。次要结局为无复发生存期和术后并发症。采用Cox回归分析和Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析。

结果

共纳入108例患者。其中73例(67%)为PHCC,24例(22%)为GBC,11例(10%)为IHCC。与PHCC相比,累及肝门的IHCC和GBC具有更多不良组织病理学因素,如淋巴结阳性(p = 0.021)、阳性淋巴结数量更多(p = 0.043)和肿瘤更大(p < 0.001)。腹膜侵犯和淋巴结阳性是生存的显著独立预测因素(分别为p = 0.011和p = 0.004)。PHCC的中位总生存期为29个月,GBC为22个月,IHCC为21个月(p = 0.53)。IHCC比GBC和PHCC更容易早期复发(p = 0.046)(分别为6、15和18个月)。

结论

接受肝大部切除术及肝外胆管切除术的累及肝门的胆管癌患者,无论亚型如何,总生存期相似,但IHCC复发更早。腹膜癌侵犯在所有亚型中都很常见,包括PHCC,并且是一个独立的预后因素。这一发现可能支持在切除的胆管癌中常规报告腹膜侵犯情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验