Van der Straeten Charis, Verbeke Jolien, Bettens Kim, De Pauw Guy, Van Lierde Kristiane
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Centre for Speech and Language Sciences (CESLAS), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Department of Oral Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
J Oral Rehabil. 2025 Jan;52(1):43-56. doi: 10.1111/joor.13873. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Based on the premise that tongue and lip force is affected in individuals with orofacial myofunctional disorders (OMDs), orofacial myofunctional therapy (OMT) programs typically include the strengthening of orofacial muscles through isometric and isotonic exercises. The purpose of this study is to examine whether there is indeed a measurable difference in maximum tongue and lip strength and endurance between subjects with and without OMDs, as well as to explore Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in this population.
Sixty healthy young adults (mean age 18.9 years, SD 0.69 years, range 18.0-21.4 years) participated in this study. Perceptual evaluation of orofacial functions was conducted using the Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores (OMES) protocol. Participants were divided into three groups, namely those with physiological orofacial functions (POF; n = 20), those with inconsistent orofacial functions (IOF; n = 11), and those with consistent OMDs (OMD; n = 29). Maximum isometric pressure and endurance of tongue and lips were measured using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI). OHRQoL was assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14).
The OMES total scores did not differ significantly between the three groups, though the subscale 'function' showed significant differences (13.637; p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences in maximum isometric pressure or endurance for tongue and lips, nor for OHIP scores, were measured between the three groups.
Although orofacial muscle strengthening is commonly part of OMT, current findings suggest the superfluity of these types of exercises in the treatment of OMDs in healthy young adults and may indicate the need to focus on awareness and rehabilitation of pathological functions in these individuals. Re-evaluation of the efficacy of OMT programs in different populations may be an important strategy going forward.
背景/目的:基于口面部肌功能紊乱(OMD)患者的舌肌和唇肌力量会受到影响这一前提,口面部肌功能治疗(OMT)方案通常包括通过等长和等张运动来增强口面部肌肉。本研究的目的是检验在患有和未患有OMD的受试者之间,最大舌肌和唇肌力量及耐力是否确实存在可测量的差异,并探索该人群的口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)。
60名健康的年轻成年人(平均年龄18.9岁,标准差0.69岁,年龄范围18.0 - 21.4岁)参与了本研究。使用带评分的口面部肌功能评估(OMES)方案对口面部功能进行感知评估。参与者被分为三组,即具有生理性口面部功能的(POF;n = 20)、口面部功能不一致的(IOF;n = 11)和患有持续性OMD的(OMD;n = 29)。使用爱荷华口腔功能仪器(IOPI)测量舌肌和唇肌的最大等长压力及耐力。使用口腔健康影响量表(OHIP - 14)评估OHRQoL。
三组之间的OMES总分无显著差异,尽管“功能”子量表显示出显著差异(13.637;p = 0.001)。三组之间在舌肌和唇肌的最大等长压力或耐力以及OHIP评分方面均未测量到统计学上的显著差异。
尽管增强口面部肌肉通常是OMT的一部分,但目前的研究结果表明,这些类型的运动在健康年轻成年人的OMD治疗中是多余的,可能表明有必要关注这些个体病理功能的意识和康复。重新评估OMT方案在不同人群中的疗效可能是未来的一项重要策略。