Metabolism Program, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Oct;40(7):e3844. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3844.
To investigate the impact of Metabolic-Bariatric surgery (MBS) on pancreatic cancer (PCa) risk in individuals with obesity based on type 2 diabetes(T2D) status.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42022367749). The primary outcomes were the PCa incidence rates in participants with or without T2D who underwent MBS compared with the control (non-MBS) group. Subgroup analyses based on the MBS types were performed and a random-effects model was employed. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by applying the leave-one-out meta-analysis technique and excluding studies with a short follow-up. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I index and Cochran's Q test. Publication bias was assessed with Egger's test and the risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool.
Twelve studies, with 3,711,243 participants, were included. PCa risk was lower in the MBS group for both T2D and the overall population than in the non-MBS group (RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.30-0.71 and RR = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.07-0.57, respectively), with consistent findings after excluding studies with < 3-year follow-up. A favourable impact was also observed in individuals without T2D (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.41-0.78). When comparing the types of MBS versus control, a significant difference was observed for sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (RR = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.12-0.46 for SG and RR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.25-1.09 for Roux-En-Y bypass). Egger's test showed no indication of publication bias (p = 0.417).
MBS is associated with reduced PCa risk regardless of T2D, with a more pronounced effect in T2D patients. Additional research is needed to investigate the impact of MBS types on PCa.
基于 2 型糖尿病(T2D)状态,研究代谢减重手术(MBS)对肥胖个体中胰腺癌(PCa)风险的影响。
我们按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PROSPERO:CRD42022367749)进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。主要结局是接受 MBS 的参与者与对照组(非 MBS 组)相比,有或没有 T2D 的参与者的 PCa 发生率。根据 MBS 类型进行了亚组分析,并采用随机效应模型。通过应用缺失数据元分析技术和排除随访时间较短的研究来进行敏感性分析。使用 I 指数和 Cochran's Q 检验评估异质性。使用 Egger 检验评估发表偏倚,并使用 Cochrane 风险偏倚工具评估风险偏倚。
纳入了 12 项研究,共有 3711243 名参与者。与非 MBS 组相比,T2D 和总体人群中 MBS 组的 PCa 风险均较低(RR=0.46,95%CI:0.30-0.71 和 RR=0.21;95%CI:0.07-0.57),排除随访时间<3 年的研究后结果一致。在没有 T2D 的个体中也观察到有利影响(RR=0.56,95%CI:0.41-0.78)。当比较 MBS 与对照组的类型时,袖状胃切除术(SG)有显著差异(RR=0.24;95%CI,0.12-0.46 用于 SG 和 RR=0.52;95%CI,0.25-1.09 用于 Roux-en-Y 旁路)。Egger 检验表明没有发表偏倚的迹象(p=0.417)。
无论是否存在 T2D,MBS 均与降低 PCa 风险相关,在 T2D 患者中效果更为显著。需要进一步研究来探讨 MBS 类型对 PCa 的影响。