Suppr超能文献

探讨导致 SARS-CoV-2 核酸检测口咽拭子采样质量变异性的原因及改进措施:一项多中心、双盲研究。

Exploring the causes of variability in quality of oropharyngeal swab sampling for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing and proposed improvement measures: a multicenter, double-blind study.

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Virology, Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infection Control, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Nov 5;12(11):e0156724. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01567-24. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

Abstract

Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has not been considered a public health emergency of international concern since last year, intermittent regional impacts still persist, and accurate testing remains crucial. Ribonuclease protein subunit P30 () RNA, known for its broad and stable expression in tissue cells, was used to evaluate samples from 10 hospitals with over 3,000 negative nucleic acid tests. The results revealed that the overall pass rate for the collected samples was consistently low and exhibited significant heterogeneity. After reassessing the evaluative effectiveness of RNA Ct values from the samples of 132 positive individuals under quarantine observation, it was used to identify factors affecting sampling quality. These factors included different stages ranging from sample collection to PCR processing, various characteristics of both samplers and individuals being sampled, as well as sampling season and location. The results indicated that post-sampling handling had minimal impact, winter and fever clinic samples showed higher quality, whereas children's samples had lower quality. The key finding was that the characteristics of samplers were closely related to sampling quality, emphasizing the role of subjectivity. Quality control warnings led to substantial improvements, confirming this finding. Consequently, although there are various factors during the testing process, the most critical aspect is to improve, supervise, and maintain standardized practices among sampling staff.This study further confirmed the reliability of internal references (IRs) in assessing sample quality, and utilized a large sample IR data to comprehensively and multidimensionally identify significant interference factors in nucleic acid test results. By further reminding and intervening in the subjective practices of specimen collectors, good results could be achieved.

摘要

虽然 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)自去年以来已不再被视为国际关注的突发公共卫生事件,但间歇性的区域性影响仍在持续,准确检测仍然至关重要。核糖核酸酶蛋白亚基 P30()RNA 以其在组织细胞中广泛而稳定的表达而闻名,用于评估来自 10 家拥有超过 3000 例阴性核酸检测的医院的样本。结果表明,所采集样本的总通过率一直较低,且表现出明显的异质性。在重新评估了来自 132 名隔离观察阳性个体样本的 RNA Ct 值评估效果后,将其用于识别影响采样质量的因素。这些因素包括从样本采集到 PCR 处理的不同阶段、采样者和被采样者的各种特征以及采样季节和地点。结果表明,采样后处理的影响最小,冬季和发热门诊样本质量较高,而儿童样本质量较低。主要发现是采样者的特征与采样质量密切相关,强调了主观性的作用。质量控制警告导致了显著的改进,证实了这一发现。因此,尽管检测过程中有各种因素,但最关键的是提高、监督和维持采样人员的标准化操作。本研究进一步证实了内参(IRs)在评估样本质量方面的可靠性,并利用大量样本 IR 数据全面、多维地识别核酸检测结果中的显著干扰因素。通过进一步提醒和干预标本采集者的主观操作,可以取得良好的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13a6/11537049/86bd62ac459d/spectrum.01567-24.f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验