• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联合口咽/鼻咽拭子与鼻咽采样用于 SARS-CoV-2 诊断 PCR 的效果相当。

Combined oropharyngeal/nasal swab is equivalent to nasopharyngeal sampling for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic PCR.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Medical Microbiology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Microbiol. 2021 Jan 22;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02087-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12866-021-02087-4
PMID:33482729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7820523/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early 2020, a COVID-19 epidemic became a public health emergency of international concern. To address this pandemic broad testing with an easy, comfortable and reliable testing method is of utmost concern. Nasopharyngeal (NP) swab sampling is the reference method though hampered by international supply shortages. A new oropharyngeal/nasal (OP/N) sampling method was investigated using the more readily available throat swab.

RESULTS

35 patients were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 by means of either NP or OP/N sampling. The paired swabs were both positive in 31 patients. The one patient who tested negative on both NP and OP/N swab on admission, was ultimately diagnosed on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. A strong correlation was found between the viral RNA loads of the paired swabs (r = 0.76; P < 0.05). The sensitivity of NP and OP/N analysis in hospitalized patients (n = 28) was 89.3% and 92.7% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates equivalence of NP and OP/N sampling for detection of SARS-CoV-2 by means of rRT-PCR. Sensitivity of both NP and OP/N sampling is very high in hospitalized patients.

摘要

背景

2020 年初,COVID-19 疫情成为国际关注的公共卫生紧急事件。为应对这一大流行病,广泛使用简便、舒适、可靠的检测方法是当务之急。鼻咽(NP)拭子采样是参考方法,但受到国际供应短缺的影响。本研究使用更易获得的咽拭子,对新的口咽/鼻腔(OP/N)采样方法进行了研究。

结果

35 例患者通过 NP 或 OP/N 采样被诊断为 SARS-CoV-2。31 例患者的配对拭子均为阳性。入院时 NP 和 OP/N 拭子均为阴性的 1 例患者,最终通过支气管肺泡灌洗液确诊。配对拭子的病毒 RNA 载量之间存在很强的相关性(r=0.76;P<0.05)。28 例住院患者中 NP 和 OP/N 分析的灵敏度分别为 89.3%和 92.7%。

结论

本研究证明了 rRT-PCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2 时 NP 和 OP/N 采样具有等效性。NP 和 OP/N 采样在住院患者中的灵敏度均非常高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6358/7821548/13f9b1ad6765/12866_2021_2087_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6358/7821548/13f9b1ad6765/12866_2021_2087_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6358/7821548/13f9b1ad6765/12866_2021_2087_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Combined oropharyngeal/nasal swab is equivalent to nasopharyngeal sampling for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic PCR.联合口咽/鼻咽拭子与鼻咽采样用于 SARS-CoV-2 诊断 PCR 的效果相当。
BMC Microbiol. 2021 Jan 22;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02087-4.
2
Combined throat/nasal swab sampling for SARS-CoV-2 is equivalent to nasopharyngeal sampling.联合咽喉/鼻腔拭子取样与鼻咽取样对 SARS-CoV-2 的检测效果相当。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;40(1):193-195. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03972-y. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
3
Performance of Saliva, Oropharyngeal Swabs, and Nasal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Detection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.唾液、咽拭子和鼻拭子用于 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Apr 20;59(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02881-20.
4
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-Based Detection Using Saliva or Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens in Asymptomatic Populations.比较基于 SARS-CoV-2 PCR 的唾液或鼻咽拭子标本在无症状人群中的检测。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0006221. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00062-21. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
5
Sensitivity of nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and nasal wash specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection in the setting of sampling device shortage.采样设备短缺时,鼻咽、口咽和鼻洗液标本检测 SARS-CoV-2 的敏感性。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;40(2):441-445. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04039-8. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
6
Adding saliva testing to oropharyngeal and deep nasal swab testing increases PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 in primary care and children.在口咽和深部鼻拭子检测中增加唾液检测可提高基层医疗和儿童中SARS-CoV-2的PCR检测率。
Med J Aust. 2021 Sep 20;215(6):273-278. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51188. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
7
Value of swab types and collection time on SARS-COV-2 detection using RT-PCR assay.拭子类型和采集时间对 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-COV-2 的影响。
J Virol Methods. 2020 Dec;286:113974. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113974. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
8
Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Throat Swabs Performed With or Without Specimen Collection From the Tonsils: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.从扁桃体采集或不采集样本的咽喉拭子对 SARS-CoV-2 的分子检测:一项多中心随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jun 12;13:e47446. doi: 10.2196/47446.
9
Comparison between Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection in an Asymptomatic Population, and Direct Confirmation by RT-PCR from the Residual Buffer.鼻拭子和咽拭子在无症状人群中用于 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的比较,以及从剩余缓冲液中用 RT-PCR 直接确认。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0245521. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02455-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
10
Head-to-head performance comparison of self-collected nasal versus professional-collected nasopharyngeal swab for a WHO-listed SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test.自行采集的鼻腔拭子与专业采集的鼻咽拭子用于世界卫生组织清单上的 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测快速诊断检测的头对头性能比较。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2021 Aug;210(4):181-186. doi: 10.1007/s00430-021-00710-9. Epub 2021 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Saline gargle collection method is comparable to nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabbing for the molecular detection and sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in Botswana.在博茨瓦纳,盐水漱口采集方法在SARS-CoV-2的分子检测和测序方面与鼻咽/口咽拭子采集方法相当。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul;13(7):e0202324. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02023-24. Epub 2025 May 22.
2
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
3
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in different types of clinical specimens among suspected COVID-19 patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection in 353 patients received tests with both specimens simultaneously.比较 353 例同时接受两种标本检测的患者的鼻咽拭子和口咽拭子在 SARS-CoV-2 检测中的应用。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 May;94:107-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.023. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
2
Comparison of throat swabs and sputum specimens for viral nucleic acid detection in 52 cases of novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2)-infected pneumonia (COVID-19).比较 52 例新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)感染性肺炎(COVID-19)患者的咽拭子和痰标本用于病毒核酸检测。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1089-1094. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0187.
3
埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴疑似新冠肺炎患者不同类型临床标本中新冠病毒RNA检测的比较
Virusdisease. 2024 Dec;35(4):567-576. doi: 10.1007/s13337-024-00892-9. Epub 2024 Nov 9.
4
Comparison of "hock-a-loogie" saliva versus nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for detecting common respiratory pathogens.“咳痰”唾液与鼻咽拭子和口咽拭子在检测常见呼吸道病原体方面的比较。
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 12;9(10):e20965. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20965. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
The Diagnostic Performance of Various Clinical Specimens for the Detection of COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis of RT-PCR Studies.用于检测新型冠状病毒肺炎的各种临床标本的诊断性能:逆转录聚合酶链反应研究的荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 26;13(19):3057. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13193057.
6
Extreme differences in SARS-CoV-2 viral loads among respiratory specimen types during presumed pre-infectious and infectious periods.在假定的感染前期和感染期,呼吸道标本类型之间的新冠病毒载量存在极大差异。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Mar 14;2(3):pgad033. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad033. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Prospective population-level validation of the Abbott ID NOW severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 device implemented in multiple settings for testing asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals.在多个环境中对 Abbott ID NOW 严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 设备进行前瞻性人群水平验证,以检测无症状和有症状个体。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Feb;29(2):247-252. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.08.025. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
8
Sensitivity and Specificity of Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection Using Different Sampling Methods: A Clinical Unicentral Study.使用不同采样方法的快速 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测的敏感性和特异性:一项临床单中心研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 2;19(11):6836. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116836.
9
The challenges of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing in low-middle income countries and possible cost-effective measures in resource-limited settings.中低收入国家严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)检测面临的挑战,以及资源有限情况下具有成本效益的措施。
Global Health. 2022 Jan 22;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00796-7.
10
Transcriptional Profiling and Machine Learning Unveil a Concordant Biosignature of Type I Interferon-Inducible Host Response Across Nasal Swab and Pulmonary Tissue for COVID-19 Diagnosis.转录谱分析和机器学习揭示了 COVID-19 诊断中鼻腔拭子和肺组织中 I 型干扰素诱导的宿主反应的一致生物标志物。
Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 22;12:733171. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.733171. eCollection 2021.
Saliva is a reliable tool to detect SARS-CoV-2.
唾液是检测 SARS-CoV-2 的可靠工具。
J Infect. 2020 Jul;81(1):e45-e50. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
4
Nasal Swab Sampling for SARS-CoV-2: a Convenient Alternative in Times of Nasopharyngeal Swab Shortage.用于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的鼻拭子采样:在鼻咽拭子短缺时期的一种便捷替代方法。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 May 26;58(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00721-20.
5
Comparison of Copan ESwab and FLOQSwab for COVID-19 Diagnosis: Working around a Supply Shortage.用于新冠病毒诊断的Copan ESwab和FLOQSwab的比较:应对供应短缺问题
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 May 26;58(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00669-20.
6
Diagnostic Testing for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus 2: A Narrative Review.严重急性呼吸综合征相关冠状病毒 2 的诊断检测:叙述性综述。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jun 2;172(11):726-734. doi: 10.7326/M20-1301. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
7
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens.SARS-CoV-2 在不同类型临床标本中的检测。
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1843-1844. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3786.
8
SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Upper Respiratory Specimens of Infected Patients.感染患者上呼吸道标本中的新型冠状病毒2型病毒载量
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 19;382(12):1177-1179. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2001737. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
9
Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.《武汉 2019 年新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎 138 例住院患者临床特征分析》
JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1061-1069. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585.
10
Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.实时 RT-PCR 检测 2019 新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045.