Suppr超能文献

旋后外旋型 4 度损伤中经跗骨间固定:术中测试可靠吗?

Trans-syndesmotic fixation in supination external rotation type 4 injuries: Are intraoperative tests reliable?

机构信息

University of Health Sciences Istanbul Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul-Türkiye.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Oct;30(10):754-760. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.37225.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ankle fractures occur due to a rotational mechanism. According to the Lauge-Hansen classification, supination-external rotation (SER) injuries are the most common type. Following osseous fixation, the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries in these injuries are controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical, functional, and radiological results of trans-syndesmotic fixation using intraoperative tests in SER type 4 ankle injuries.

METHODS

Ankle syndesmosis was intraoperatively evaluated using cotton/hook and manual external rotation stress tests in 64 patients with SER type 4 fracture dislocation injuries. These patients were divided into two groups: those treated with and without trans-syndesmotic fixation in addition to open reduction and internal fixation of the fractures. Ankle range of motion (ROM), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score, and Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), tibiofibular overlap, tibiofibular clear space, and joint arthritis based on the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) scale were evaluated.

RESULTS

Median values of OMAS (Z=-3.92, p<0.001), AOFAS (Z=-4.31, p<0.001), and ROM (Z=-2.95, p=0.003) were higher in Group 1. There were no differences between the groups regarding tibiofibular overlap median values (Z=-0.59, p=0.0554), tibiofibular clear space (Z=-1.13, p=0.258), and Kellgren-Lawrence arthritis scale. Lack of posterior malleolus fixation was found to increase the risk of arthritis by 18.197 times, despite having trans-syndesmotic fixation, which was statistically significant (Confidence Interval, CI: 2.482-133.417, p=0.004) (Table 4).

CONCLUSION

Median values of OMAS, AOFAS, and ROM in patients without trans-syndesmotic fixation were lower. These results indicate that intraoperative tests may not provide entirely accurate results in SER type 4 injuries. Failure to detect a syndesmotic injury timely can result in instability. Therefore, we think that routine trans-syndesmotic fixation, as well as posterior malleolus fixation in SER type 4 ankle injuries, may improve outcomes.

摘要

背景

踝关节骨折是由于旋转机制引起的。根据劳厄-汉森分类,旋前外展(SER)损伤是最常见的类型。在进行骨固定后,这些损伤的下胫腓联合损伤的评估和治疗存在争议。本研究旨在评估术中试验在 SER 4 型踝关节损伤中对下胫腓联合固定的临床、功能和影像学结果。

方法

对 64 例 SER 4 型骨折脱位损伤患者进行踝关节下胫腓联合的术中评估,采用棉花/钩和手动外旋应力试验。这些患者分为两组:一组在切开复位内固定骨折的同时进行下胫腓联合固定,另一组不进行下胫腓联合固定。评估踝关节活动范围(ROM)、美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)踝关节-后足评分和 Olerud-Molander 踝关节评分(OMAS)、胫腓骨重叠、胫腓骨间隙和关节关节炎(根据 Kellgren-Lawrence(K-L)分级)。

结果

组 1 的 OMAS(Z=-3.92,p<0.001)、AOFAS(Z=-4.31,p<0.001)和 ROM(Z=-2.95,p=0.003)的中位数均较高。两组之间的胫腓骨重叠中位数(Z=-0.59,p=0.0554)、胫腓骨间隙(Z=-1.13,p=0.258)和 Kellgren-Lawrence 关节炎分级无差异。尽管进行了下胫腓联合固定,但后踝固定缺失会使关节炎的风险增加 18.197 倍,具有统计学意义(置信区间,CI:2.482-133.417,p=0.004)(表 4)。

结论

未进行下胫腓联合固定的患者的 OMAS、AOFAS 和 ROM 的中位数较低。这些结果表明,SER 4 型损伤中的术中试验可能无法提供完全准确的结果。未能及时发现下胫腓联合损伤可能导致不稳定。因此,我们认为在 SER 4 型踝关节损伤中常规进行下胫腓联合固定以及后踝固定可能会改善预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ca9/11622706/5dfd86f47a5a/TJTES-30-754-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验