School of Communication and Culture, Department of Digital Design and Information Studies, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Oct 9;30(5):45. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00510-3.
In this editorial to the Topical Collection "Innovation under Fire: The Rise of Ethics in Tech", we provide an overview of the papers gathered in the collection, reflect on similarities and differences in their analytical angles and methodological approaches, and carve out some of the cross-cutting themes that emerge from research on the production of 'Tech Ethics'. We identify two recurring ways through which 'Tech Ethics' are studied and forms of critique towards them developed, which we argue diverge primarily in their a priori commitments towards what ethical tech is and how it should best be pursued. Beyond these differences, we observe how current research on 'Tech Ethics' evidences a close relationship between public controversies about technological innovation and the rise of ethics discourses and instruments for their settlement, producing legitimacy crises for 'Tech Ethics' in and of itself. 'Tech Ethics' is not only instrumental for governing technoscientific projects in the present but is equally instrumental for the construction of socio-technical imaginaries and the essentialization of technological futures. We suggest that efforts to reach beyond single case-studies are needed and call for collective reflection on joint issues and challenges to advance the critical project of 'Tech Ethics'.
在本专题“创新之火下的伦理问题:技术伦理的兴起”的社论中,我们概述了本专题集中的论文,反思了它们在分析角度和方法上的异同,并梳理出了从“技术伦理”生产研究中浮现出的一些跨主题。我们确定了两种反复出现的研究“技术伦理”的方式和对其进行批判的形式,我们认为这两种方式主要的分歧在于它们对什么是伦理技术以及如何最好地追求伦理技术的先验承诺。除了这些差异之外,我们还观察到,当前关于“技术伦理”的研究表明,技术创新的公众争议与伦理话语和解决这些争议的工具之间存在密切关系,这使得“技术伦理”本身产生了合法性危机。“技术伦理”不仅是治理当前技术科学项目的工具,而且同样是构建社会技术想象和使技术未来本质化的工具。我们建议需要努力超越单一案例研究,并呼吁对共同问题和挑战进行集体反思,以推进“技术伦理”的批判性项目。