短期 DAPT 与急性冠状动脉综合征患者的 DAPT 降级策略:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Short-Term DAPT and DAPT De-Escalation Strategies for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
机构信息
Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center (T.K.), Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY.
Division of Cardiology (T.K.), Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY.
出版信息
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Sep;16(9):e013242. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013242. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
BACKGROUND
Short-term (≤6 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and DAPT de-escalation become attractive for patients with acute coronary syndrome.
METHODS
A systemic search identified randomized controlled trials that included patients with acute coronary syndrome treated using (1) standard DAPT (12 months) with clopidogrel, prasugrel (standard/low dose), or ticagrelor; (2) extended DAPT (≥18 months); (3) short-term DAPT (≤6 months) followed by P2Y inhibitor or aspirin; (4) 12-month DAPT with unguided de-escalation from potent P2Y inhibitors to low-dose potent P2Y inhibitor or clopidogrel at 1 month; and (5) guided selection DAPT with genotype or platelet function tests. The primary efficacy outcome (major adverse cardiovascular events) was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The primary safety outcome was major or minor bleeding.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 32 randomized controlled trials with 103 497 patients. While there were no differences in efficacy between short, unguided de-escalation and guided selection strategies, unguided de-escalation was associated with reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with standard DAPT with clopidogrel or ticagrelor (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.67 [0.49-0.93] and 0.68 [0.50-0.93]). Both short DAPT followed by P2Y inhibitor and unguided de-escalation were associated with reduced risks in safety compared with other strategies, including guided selection (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.66 [0.47-0.93] and 0.48 [0.33-0.71]). Short DAPT followed by a P2Y inhibitor was associated with reduced risk of major bleeding and all-cause death compared with standard, extended DAPT (eg, versus DAPT with clopidogrel; hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.64 [0.42-0.97] and 0.60 [0.44-0.82]). By rankogram, unguided de-escalation strategy was the safest and most effective strategy in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events and major or minor bleeding while short DAPT followed by P2Y inhibitor was ranked the best for major bleeding and all-cause death.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with acute coronary syndrome, unguided de-escalation was associated with the lowest risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and major or minor bleeding outcomes, while short DAPT followed by P2Y inhibitor was associated with the lowest risk of major bleeding and all-cause death.
背景
短期(≤6 个月)双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)和 DAPT 降级对急性冠脉综合征患者具有吸引力。
方法
系统检索确定了纳入急性冠脉综合征患者的随机对照试验,这些患者接受了以下治疗:(1)标准 DAPT(12 个月),使用氯吡格雷、普拉格雷(标准/低剂量)或替格瑞洛;(2)延长 DAPT(≥18 个月);(3)短期 DAPT(≤6 个月),随后使用 P2Y 抑制剂或阿司匹林;(4)12 个月 DAPT,在 1 个月时从强效 P2Y 抑制剂无指导降级为低剂量强效 P2Y 抑制剂或氯吡格雷;(5)有指导的选择 DAPT,采用基因分型或血小板功能试验。主要疗效结局(主要不良心血管事件)是心血管死亡、心肌梗死或卒中的复合结局。主要安全性结局是主要或次要出血。
结果
这项荟萃分析纳入了 32 项随机对照试验,共 103497 例患者。虽然短期、无指导降级和有指导选择策略之间在疗效上没有差异,但与氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛标准 DAPT 相比,无指导降级与降低主要不良心血管事件风险相关(风险比[95%CI],0.67[0.49-0.93]和 0.68[0.50-0.93])。与其他策略相比,短期 DAPT 后使用 P2Y 抑制剂和无指导降级均与安全性风险降低相关,包括有指导选择(风险比[95%CI],0.66[0.47-0.93]和 0.48[0.33-0.71])。与标准、延长 DAPT 相比,短期 DAPT 后使用 P2Y 抑制剂与降低主要出血和全因死亡风险相关(例如,与氯吡格雷的 DAPT 相比;风险比[95%CI],0.64[0.42-0.97]和 0.60[0.44-0.82])。根据秩和图,无指导降级策略在降低主要不良心血管事件和主要或次要出血方面是最安全和最有效的策略,而短期 DAPT 后使用 P2Y 抑制剂在降低主要出血和全因死亡方面的风险最低。
结论
在急性冠脉综合征患者中,无指导降级与主要不良心血管事件和主要或次要出血结局的风险最低相关,而短期 DAPT 后使用 P2Y 抑制剂与主要出血和全因死亡的风险最低相关。