• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国放射学会(ACR)数字乳腺摄影(DM)体模图像的自动质量控制分析。

Automated quality control analysis for American College of Radiology (ACR) digital mammography (DM) phantom images.

作者信息

Alawaji Zeyad, Taba Seyedamir Tavakoli, Cartwright Lucy, Rae William

机构信息

Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Department of Radiologic Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Dec;25(12):e14548. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14548. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1002/acm2.14548
PMID:39382940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11633796/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop and validate an automated software analysis method for mammography image quality assessment of the American College of Radiology (ACR) digital mammography (DM) phantom images.

METHODS

Twenty-seven DICOM images were acquired using Fuji mammography systems. All images were evaluated by three expert medical physicists using the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) mammography quality control guideline. To enhance the robustness and sensitivity assessment of our algorithm, an additional set of 12 images from a Hologic mammography system was included to test various phantom positional adjustments. The software automatically chose multiple regions of interest (ROIs) for analysis. A template matching method was primarily used for image analysis, followed by an additional method that locates and scores each target object (speck groups, fibers, and masses).

RESULTS

The software performance shows a good to excellent agreement with the average scoring of observers (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] of 0.75, 0.79, 0.82 for speck groups, fibers, and masses, respectively). No significant differences were found in the scoring of target objects between human observers and the software. Both methods achieved scores meeting the pass criteria for speck groups and masses. Expert observers allocated lower scores to fiber objects, with diameters less than 0.61 mm, when compared to the software. The software was able to accurately score objects when the phantom position changed by up to 25 mm laterally, up to 5 degrees rotation, and overhanging the chest wall edge by up to 15 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Automated software analysis is a feasible method that may help improve the consistency and reproducibility of mammography image quality assessment with reduced reliance on human interaction and processing time.

摘要

目的

开发并验证一种用于美国放射学会(ACR)数字乳腺摄影(DM)体模图像质量评估的自动化软件分析方法。

方法

使用富士乳腺摄影系统采集了27幅DICOM图像。所有图像均由三位医学物理专家按照澳大利亚和新西兰皇家放射学会(RANZCR)乳腺摄影质量控制指南进行评估。为了增强我们算法的稳健性和敏感性评估,还纳入了一组来自Hologic乳腺摄影系统的12幅图像,以测试各种体模位置调整。该软件自动选择多个感兴趣区域(ROI)进行分析。主要使用模板匹配方法进行图像分析,随后采用另一种方法对每个目标对象(斑点组、纤维和肿块)进行定位和评分。

结果

软件性能与观察者的平均评分显示出良好到优秀的一致性(斑点组、纤维和肿块的组内相关系数[ICC]分别为0.75、0.79、0.82)。在目标对象评分方面,人类观察者和软件之间未发现显著差异。两种方法对斑点组和肿块的评分均达到了通过标准。与软件相比,专家观察者对直径小于0.61毫米的纤维对象评分较低。当体模位置横向变化高达25毫米、旋转高达5度以及超出胸壁边缘高达15毫米时,该软件仍能够准确地对对象进行评分。

结论

自动化软件分析是一种可行的方法,有助于提高乳腺摄影图像质量评估的一致性和可重复性,同时减少对人工交互和处理时间的依赖。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f89a/11633796/6ad62dfa0d22/ACM2-25-e14548-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f89a/11633796/11a6e48b3f76/ACM2-25-e14548-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f89a/11633796/2e2d6a28d2ce/ACM2-25-e14548-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f89a/11633796/ede38af7b467/ACM2-25-e14548-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f89a/11633796/1b9b92f9a094/ACM2-25-e14548-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f89a/11633796/323243e9f49b/ACM2-25-e14548-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f89a/11633796/9a39620de470/ACM2-25-e14548-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f89a/11633796/6ad62dfa0d22/ACM2-25-e14548-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f89a/11633796/11a6e48b3f76/ACM2-25-e14548-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f89a/11633796/2e2d6a28d2ce/ACM2-25-e14548-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f89a/11633796/ede38af7b467/ACM2-25-e14548-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f89a/11633796/1b9b92f9a094/ACM2-25-e14548-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f89a/11633796/323243e9f49b/ACM2-25-e14548-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f89a/11633796/9a39620de470/ACM2-25-e14548-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f89a/11633796/6ad62dfa0d22/ACM2-25-e14548-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Automated quality control analysis for American College of Radiology (ACR) digital mammography (DM) phantom images.美国放射学会(ACR)数字乳腺摄影(DM)体模图像的自动质量控制分析。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Dec;25(12):e14548. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14548. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
2
Automated daily quality control analysis for mammography in a multi-unit imaging center.多单元成像中心乳腺钼靶摄影的自动化每日质量控制分析
Acta Radiol. 2019 Feb;60(2):140-148. doi: 10.1177/0284185118776502. Epub 2018 May 16.
3
Automated analysis of the American College of Radiology mammographic accreditation phantom images.美国放射学会乳腺摄影认证体模图像的自动化分析
Med Phys. 1997 May;24(5):709-23. doi: 10.1118/1.597992.
4
Which phantom is better for assessing the image quality in full-field digital mammography?: American College of Radiology Accreditation phantom versus digital mammography accreditation phantom.在全数字化乳腺摄影中,哪种模体更适合评估图像质量?:美国放射学院认证模体与数字乳腺摄影认证模体。
Korean J Radiol. 2012 Nov-Dec;13(6):776-83. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.6.776. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
5
Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.在组织等效乳房模型中,对比全场数字化乳腺摄影与屏-片乳腺摄影的对比度和空间分辨率。
Med Phys. 2005 Oct;32(10):3144-50. doi: 10.1118/1.2040710.
6
Automated image quality assessment of mammography phantoms: a systematic review.自动乳腺 X 线摄影模体图像质量评估:系统评价。
Acta Radiol. 2023 Mar;64(3):971-986. doi: 10.1177/02841851221112856. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
7
Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: a simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom.曝光均衡对数字乳腺摄影图像信噪比的影响:用人形乳房体模进行的模拟研究。
Med Phys. 2011 Dec;38(12):6489-501. doi: 10.1118/1.3659709.
8
A multiparametric automatic method to monitor long-term reproducibility in digital mammography: results from a regional screening programme.一种用于监测数字化乳腺摄影长期可重复性的多参数自动方法:一项区域筛查计划的结果
Eur Radiol. 2017 Sep;27(9):3776-3787. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4735-x. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
9
How good is the ACR accreditation phantom for assessing image quality in digital mammography?美国放射学会(ACR)认证模体在评估数字化乳腺摄影图像质量方面的效果如何?
Acad Radiol. 2002 Jul;9(7):764-72. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80345-8.
10
Computerized quantitative evaluation of mammographic accreditation phantom images.计算机化的乳腺摄影认证体模图像定量评估。
Med Phys. 2010 Dec;37(12):6323-31. doi: 10.1118/1.3516238.

本文引用的文献

1
The IAEA remote and automated quality control methodology for radiography and mammography.国际原子能机构用于射线照相术和乳房 X 光摄影术的远程和自动化质量控制方法。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Nov;22(11):126-142. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13431. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
2
Automated daily quality control analysis for mammography in a multi-unit imaging center.多单元成像中心乳腺钼靶摄影的自动化每日质量控制分析
Acta Radiol. 2019 Feb;60(2):140-148. doi: 10.1177/0284185118776502. Epub 2018 May 16.
3
Cancer statistics, 2018.癌症统计数据,2018 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
4
A multiparametric automatic method to monitor long-term reproducibility in digital mammography: results from a regional screening programme.一种用于监测数字化乳腺摄影长期可重复性的多参数自动方法:一项区域筛查计划的结果
Eur Radiol. 2017 Sep;27(9):3776-3787. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4735-x. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
5
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
6
How does c-view image quality compare with conventional 2D FFDM?c-view图像质量与传统二维数字乳腺断层摄影(2D FFDM)相比如何?
Med Phys. 2016 May;43(5):2538. doi: 10.1118/1.4947293.
7
Ongoing quality control in digital radiography: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 151.数字放射成像中的持续质量控制:美国医学物理师协会成像物理委员会任务组151报告
Med Phys. 2015 Nov;42(11):6658-70. doi: 10.1118/1.4932623.
8
Quality assurance and quality control in mammography: a review of available guidance worldwide.乳腺 X 线摄影的质量保证和质量控制:对全球现有指南的综述。
Insights Imaging. 2013 Oct;4(5):539-53. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0269-1. Epub 2013 Aug 4.
9
Application of wavelets to the evaluation of phantom images for mammography quality control.小波在乳腺 X 射线摄影质量控制体模图像评价中的应用。
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Nov 7;57(21):7177-90. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/7177. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
10
Computerized scheme for evaluating mammographic phantom images.计算机化的乳腺影像模体评估方案。
Med Phys. 2012 Mar;39(3):1609-17. doi: 10.1118/1.3687159.