• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估数字模型、打印模型和直接测量获得的水平和垂直线性测量的一致性。

Evaluation of the agreement of horizontal and vertical linear measurements obtained from digital models, printed models and direct measurements.

机构信息

Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Faculdade de Odontologia, Departamento de Ortodontia (Juiz de Fora/MG, Brazil).

Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Faculdade de Odontologia (Juiz de Fora/MG, Brazil).

出版信息

Dental Press J Orthod. 2024 Oct 7;29(5):e242460. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.5.e242460.oar. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1590/2177-6709.29.5.e242460.oar
PMID:39383373
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11457967/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of arch models is essential in diagnosis and planning in orthodontics. The demand for digital and printed models has increased among professionals.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess the agreement of horizontal and vertical linear measurements obtained from digital models, printed models, and direct measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Intraoral scans of 30 individuals were obtained. Digital measurements were performed using the STL files. From printed models, the measurements were done using a digital caliper, and the real measurements were done directly to the mouth of respective patients.

RESULTS

The one-sample t test showed no discrepancy between the paired sets of measurements, with the value of 0 (p>0.05). The evaluation of the measurements was done using Bland-Altman analysis in pairs. The three methods showed agreement in horizontal and vertical measurements. Linear regression analyses showed no proportional bias in the data (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The horizontal and vertical measurements evaluated showed agreement when measured on digital models, printed models and directly in the individuals' mouths.

摘要

简介

在正畸诊断和计划中,使用牙弓模型至关重要。专业人士对数字模型和打印模型的需求有所增加。

目的

本研究旨在评估从数字模型、打印模型和直接测量中获得的水平和垂直线性测量值的一致性。

材料和方法

对 30 名个体进行了口腔内扫描。使用 STL 文件进行数字测量。从打印模型中,使用数字卡尺进行测量,并且直接对患者的口腔进行实际测量。

结果

单样本 t 检验显示配对测量值之间没有差异,值为 0(p>0.05)。通过配对 Bland-Altman 分析对测量值进行了评估。三种方法在水平和垂直测量上均显示出一致性。线性回归分析显示数据中没有比例偏差(p>0.05)。

结论

当在数字模型、打印模型和个体口腔中直接测量时,评估的水平和垂直测量值显示出一致性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50cd/11457967/1cbc6bdfd3bd/2177-6709-dpjo-29-05-e242460-gf3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50cd/11457967/7c48ce1ce5d6/2177-6709-dpjo-29-05-e242460-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50cd/11457967/97ec733f9bc3/2177-6709-dpjo-29-05-e242460-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50cd/11457967/1cbc6bdfd3bd/2177-6709-dpjo-29-05-e242460-gf3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50cd/11457967/7c48ce1ce5d6/2177-6709-dpjo-29-05-e242460-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50cd/11457967/97ec733f9bc3/2177-6709-dpjo-29-05-e242460-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50cd/11457967/1cbc6bdfd3bd/2177-6709-dpjo-29-05-e242460-gf3.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the agreement of horizontal and vertical linear measurements obtained from digital models, printed models and direct measurements.评估数字模型、打印模型和直接测量获得的水平和垂直线性测量的一致性。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2024 Oct 7;29(5):e242460. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.5.e242460.oar. eCollection 2024.
2
Accuracy of 3-dimensional curvilinear measurements on digital models with intraoral scanners.使用口内扫描仪在数字模型上进行三维曲线测量的准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Sep;152(3):420-425. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.05.011.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.无印模数字化模型的诊断准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Dec;144(6):916-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.024.
4
Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.口腔内扫描与石膏模型的有效性比较:牙科测量和三维表面分析的体内比较
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 15;11(6):e0157713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157713. eCollection 2016.
5
Accuracy of digital dental models and three-dimensional printed dental models in linear measurements and Bolton analysis.数字化牙颌模型和三维打印牙颌模型在直线测量和 Bolton 分析中的准确性。
F1000Res. 2021 Mar 4;10:180. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.31865.2. eCollection 2021.
6
Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch?是否可以使用面部的横断面和垂直测量来确定下颌弓的形状?
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Nov 1;15(6):735-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1608.
7
Effect of printing technology, layer height, and orientation on assessment of 3D-printed models.打印技术、层厚和方向对 3D 打印模型评估的影响。
J World Fed Orthod. 2024 Aug;13(4):169-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.03.006. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
8
Reliability and intra-examiner agreement of orthodontic model analysis with a digital caliper on plaster and printed dental models.正畸模型分析与数字卡尺在石膏和打印牙模上的可靠性和组内一致性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Aug;23(8):3387-3396. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2772-8. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
9
Evaluating the influence of palate scanning on the accuracy of complete-arch digital impressions-An in vitro study.评估腭扫描对全牙弓数字印模准确性的影响——一项体外研究。
J Dent. 2024 Jun;145:105014. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105014. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
10
Accuracy of stereolithographically printed digital models compared to plaster models.与石膏模型相比,立体光刻打印数字模型的准确性。
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Sep;78(5):394-402. doi: 10.1007/s00056-017-0093-1. Epub 2017 Mar 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Orthodontic digital workflow: devices and clinical applications.口腔正畸数字化工作流程:设备与临床应用。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2021 Dec 15;26(6):e21spe6. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.6.e21spe6. eCollection 2021.
2
Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions.基于数字化口内印模的三维打印牙颌模型的准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Nov;154(5):733-739. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.06.009.
3
Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype technologies and different designs of model bases.
采用两种原型技术和不同设计的模型底座制作的打印牙科模型的准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jun;151(6):1178-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.012.
4
Diagnostic accuracy and measurement sensitivity of digital models for orthodontic purposes: A systematic review.正畸用途数字模型的诊断准确性和测量敏感性:一项系统评价。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Feb;149(2):161-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.029.
5
Intraoral Digital Impression Technique Compared to Conventional Impression Technique. A Randomized Clinical Trial.口腔内数字印模技术与传统印模技术的比较:一项随机临床试验
J Prosthodont. 2016 Jun;25(4):282-7. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12410. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
6
Reliability of digital orthodontic setups.数字化正畸方案的可靠性。
Angle Orthod. 2016 Mar;86(2):255-9. doi: 10.2319/120914-890.1. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
7
Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques.不同快速成型技术重建的牙模的准确性和可重复性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jan;145(1):108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.05.011.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.无印模数字化模型的诊断准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Dec;144(6):916-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.024.
9
Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow.数字化和传统印模技术及工作流程的准确性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Sep;17(7):1759-64. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0864-4. Epub 2012 Oct 21.
10
Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review.数字化研究模型与石膏模型的正畸测量比较:系统评价。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011 Feb;14(1):1-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.x. Epub 2010 Nov 22.