• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口腔内扫描与石膏模型的有效性比较:牙科测量和三维表面分析的体内比较

Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Fan, Suh Kyung-Jin, Lee Kyung-Min

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, 4D Dental Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Jun 15;11(6):e0157713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157713. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0157713
PMID:27304976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4909173/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Dental measurements have been commonly taken from plaster dental models obtained from alginate impressions can. Through the use of an intraoral scanner, digital impressions now acquire the information directly from the mouth. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the intraoral scans compared to plaster models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two types of dental models (intraoral scan and plaster model) of 20 subjects were included in this study. The subjects had impressions taken of their teeth and made as plaster model. In addition, their mouths were scanned with the intraoral scanner and the scans were converted into digital models. Eight transverse and 16 anteroposterior measurements, 24 tooth heights and widths were recorded on the plaster models with a digital caliper and on the intraoral scan with 3D reverse engineering software. For 3D surface analysis, the two models were superimposed by using best-fit algorithm. The average differences between the two models at all points on the surfaces were computed. Paired t-test and Bland-Altman plot were used to determine the validity of measurements from the intraoral scan compared to those from the plaster model.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the plaster models and intraoral scans, except for one measurement of lower intermolar width. The Bland-Altman plots of all measurements showed that differences between the two models were within the limits of agreement. The average surface difference between the two models was within 0.10 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study indicate that the intraoral scans are clinically acceptable for diagnosis and treatment planning in dentistry and can be used in place of plaster models.

摘要

目的

牙科测量通常是从藻酸盐印模制取的石膏牙模型上进行的。通过使用口腔内扫描仪,数字印模现在可以直接从口腔获取信息。本研究的目的是确定与石膏模型相比口腔内扫描的有效性。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了20名受试者的两种类型的牙模型(口腔内扫描模型和石膏模型)。对受试者的牙齿制取印模并制作成石膏模型。此外,用口腔内扫描仪对他们的口腔进行扫描,并将扫描结果转换为数字模型。使用数字卡尺在石膏模型上记录8项横向和16项前后向测量值、24项牙齿高度和宽度,并用三维逆向工程软件在口腔内扫描模型上记录这些数据。对于三维表面分析,使用最佳拟合算法将两种模型叠加。计算两种模型在表面所有点的平均差异。采用配对t检验和布兰德-奥特曼图来确定与石膏模型相比口腔内扫描测量的有效性。

结果

除一项下颌磨牙间宽度测量外,石膏模型和口腔内扫描之间没有显著差异。所有测量的布兰德-奥特曼图显示,两种模型之间的差异在一致限度内。两种模型的平均表面差异在0.10毫米以内。

结论

本研究结果表明,口腔内扫描在牙科诊断和治疗计划中在临床上是可接受的,并且可以替代石膏模型使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4724/4909173/65976fc745e4/pone.0157713.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4724/4909173/370fcae89a0e/pone.0157713.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4724/4909173/481558b8bafb/pone.0157713.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4724/4909173/65976fc745e4/pone.0157713.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4724/4909173/370fcae89a0e/pone.0157713.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4724/4909173/481558b8bafb/pone.0157713.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4724/4909173/65976fc745e4/pone.0157713.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.口腔内扫描与石膏模型的有效性比较:牙科测量和三维表面分析的体内比较
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 15;11(6):e0157713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157713. eCollection 2016.
2
Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.藻酸盐印模的口内扫描仪和锥形束 CT 扫描所获数字模型的线性测量的准确性、可重复性和可靠性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jan;143(1):140-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.06.018.
3
Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.数字模型与石膏牙模的空间分析评估比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jul;136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.019.
4
Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.传统石膏模型、印模扫描获得的数字模型和石膏模型扫描获得的数字模型之间的牙齿测量比较。
Int Orthod. 2019 Mar;17(1):151-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
5
Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.使用正畸分析软件对石膏模型三维扫描获得的数字模型进行测量:评估者内信度和效度。
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Jan;77(1):22-30. doi: 10.1007/s00056-015-0004-2. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
6
Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner.使用口内扫描仪创建的石膏模型和数字模型测量的准确性和可重复性。
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 May;78(3):211-220. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0070-0. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
7
Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.全上颌(包括完整牙列和腭部软组织)口内数字化印模的准确性
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 6;11(7):e0158800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158800. eCollection 2016.
8
Intraoral 3D Scanning or Dental Impressions for the Assessment of Dental Arch Relationships in Cleft Care: Which is Superior?口腔内三维扫描或牙模用于腭裂治疗中牙弓关系评估:哪种方法更优?
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016 Sep;53(5):568-77. doi: 10.1597/15-036. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
9
Reproducibility of an intraoral scanner: A comparison between in-vivo and ex-vivo scans.口腔内扫描仪的可重复性:体内与体外扫描的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Aug;154(2):305-310. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.09.022.
10
Impact of orthodontic brackets on intraoral and extraoral scans.正畸托槽对口腔内和口腔外扫描的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Aug;162(2):208-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.03.021. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Applicability of intraoral scans for presurgical orthopedic treatment of cleft lip and palate in infants: a prospective non-randomized comparative study.口腔内扫描在婴儿唇腭裂术前正畸治疗中的适用性:一项前瞻性非随机对照研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jul 9;29(8):378. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06444-9.
2
Analyzing the influence of scanning speeds and distances on digital intraoral scans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.分析扫描速度和距离对口腔数字扫描的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Evid Based Dent. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1038/s41432-025-01135-6.
3
Accuracy of Digital Intraoral Scans Three-dimensional Surface Analysis Compared with Plaster Models Dental Measurement in Mixed Dentition.

本文引用的文献

1
Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions.传统印模和数字印模后钴铬合金和氧化锆4单位固定局部义齿的适配性
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Mar;20(2):283-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1513-5. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
2
Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients.基于口内数字印模和传统印模的患者单颗牙齿修复体的准确性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Nov;19(8):2027-34. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1430-7. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
3
Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes.
混合牙列中数字口内扫描三维表面分析与石膏模型牙齿测量的准确性比较
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Dec;17(12):1363-1369. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3013.
4
Reverse engineering in medical application: literature review, proof of concept and future perspectives.医学应用中的逆向工程:文献综述、概念验证及未来展望。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 9;14(1):23621. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74176-z.
5
Accuracy Analysis of Digital Models from Intraoral Scanners and 3D-Printed Casts in Children and Teenagers.儿童和青少年口腔内扫描仪及3D打印模型的数字模型准确性分析
Children (Basel). 2024 Sep 3;11(9):1082. doi: 10.3390/children11091082.
6
A Comparison of Tooth Size and Arch Dimensions Among Measurements Taken Intraorally with 3D-Printed and Digital Models Obtained from Intraoral Scans.口腔内测量的牙齿大小与通过口腔内扫描获得的三维打印模型和数字模型的牙弓尺寸比较。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2024 Aug 1;16(8):e1012-e1020. doi: 10.4317/jced.61891. eCollection 2024 Aug.
7
Text mining analysis of scientific literature on digital intraoral scanners in dentistry: Bibliometric analysis.牙科数字口腔扫描仪科学文献的文本挖掘分析:文献计量分析。
Digit Health. 2024 Jun 5;10:20552076241260837. doi: 10.1177/20552076241260837. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
8
Virtual tumor mapping and margin control with 3-D planning and navigation.采用三维规划与导航技术进行虚拟肿瘤映射及边界控制。
Innov Surg Sci. 2024 Apr 25;9(1):17-24. doi: 10.1515/iss-2021-0009. eCollection 2024 Mar.
9
A Systematic Review of the Use of Intraoral Scanning for Human Identification Based on Palatal Morphology.基于腭部形态的口腔内扫描用于人类身份识别的系统评价。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Mar 1;14(5):531. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14050531.
10
Trueness of intraoral scanning for different tooth-size arch-length deficiencies.不同牙弓长度不足情况下口内扫描的准确性
J Dent Sci. 2024 Jan;19(1):397-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.08.006. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
无牙患者的数字化与传统种植体印模:准确性结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Apr;27(4):465-72. doi: 10.1111/clr.12567. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
4
Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology.基于波前采样技术,比较通过硅橡胶和数字化口内印模获得的全瓷冠适配性的临床评估。
J Dent. 2015 Feb;43(2):201-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.12.007. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
5
Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.基于数字印模和传统印模制作的压制及计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造陶瓷全冠的内部适合性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Apr;113(4):304-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
6
Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.直接椅旁口腔扫描仪的临床应用:准确性、时间及患者接受度评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Nov;146(5):673-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.023. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
7
Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data.基于口内扫描仪数据的计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造生成的牙模的准确性。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Nov;145(11):1133-40. doi: 10.14219/jada.2014.87.
8
Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis.4款口内扫描仪的扫描准确性和精度:基于三维分析的体外比较
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Dec;112(6):1461-71. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Aug 16.
9
Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth.基于平行共焦激光技术的数字印模系统用于种植体的准确性,并考虑了操作者经验、种植体角度和深度。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Jul-Aug;29(4):853-62. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3343.
10
In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions.传统和数字方法获取全牙弓牙印模准确性的体外评估
Quintessence Int. 2015 Jan;46(1):9-17. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a32244.