• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

博茨瓦纳诊所临床数据流程:混合方法评估议定书。

Clinical Data Flow in Botswana Clinics: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Assessment.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

eHealth Research Unit, Department of Computer Science, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Oct 9;13:e52411. doi: 10.2196/52411.

DOI:10.2196/52411
PMID:39383523
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11514319/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Botswana has made significant investments in its health care information infrastructure, including vertical programs for child health and nutrition, HIV care, and tuberculosis. However, effectively integrating the more than 18 systems in place for data collection and reporting has proved to be challenging. The Botswana Health Data Collaborative Roadmap Strategy (2020-24) states that "there exists parallel reporting systems and data is not integrated into the mainstream reports at the national level," seconded by the Botswana National eLearning strategy (2020), which states that "there is inadequate information flow at all levels, proliferation of systems, reporting tools are not synthesized; hence too many systems are not communicating."

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study are to (1) create a visual representation of how data are processed and the inputs and outputs through each health care system level; (2) understand how frontline workers perceive health care data sharing across existing platforms and the impact of data on health care service delivery.

METHODS

The setting included a varied range of 30 health care facilities across Botswana, aiming to capture insights from multiple perspectives into data flow and system integration challenges. The study design combined qualitative and quantitative methodologies, informed by the rapid assessment process and the technology assessment model for resource limited settings. The study used a participatory research approach to ensure comprehensive stakeholder engagement from its inception. Survey instruments were designed to capture the intricacies of data processing, sharing, and integration among health care workers. A purposive sampling strategy was used to ensure a wide representation of participants across different health care roles and settings. Data collection used both digital surveys and in-depth interviews. Preliminary themes for analysis include perceptions of the value of health care data and experiences in data collection and sharing. Ethical approvals were comprehensively obtained, reflecting the commitment to uphold research integrity and participant welfare throughout the study.

RESULTS

The study recruited almost 44 health care facilities, spanning a variety of health care facilities. Of the 44 recruited facilities, 27 responded to the surveys and participated in the interviews. A total of 75% (112/150) of health care professionals participating came from clinics, 20% (30/150) from hospitals, and 5% (8/150) from health posts and mobile clinics. As of October 10, 2023, the study had collected over 200 quantitative surveys and conducted 90 semistructured interviews.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has so far shown enthusiastic engagement from the health care community, underscoring the relevance and necessity of this study's objectives. We believe the methodology, centered around extensive community engagement, is pivotal in capturing a nuanced understanding of the health care data ecosystem. The focus will now shift to the analysis phase of the study, with the aim of developing comprehensive recommendations for improving data flow within Botswana's health care system.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/52411.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cdd/11514319/1d158a8bd6f6/resprot_v13i1e52411_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cdd/11514319/1d158a8bd6f6/resprot_v13i1e52411_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cdd/11514319/1d158a8bd6f6/resprot_v13i1e52411_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

博茨瓦纳在医疗保健信息基础设施方面进行了大量投资,包括儿童健康和营养、艾滋病毒护理和结核病等垂直项目。然而,有效地整合现有的 18 个以上用于数据收集和报告的系统已被证明具有挑战性。博茨瓦纳卫生数据协作路线图战略(2020-24 年)指出,“存在并行报告系统,数据未纳入国家一级的主流报告”,博茨瓦纳国家电子学习战略(2020 年)也表示,“各级之间的信息流不足,系统泛滥,报告工具没有综合,因此太多系统无法进行沟通”。

目的

本研究的目的是:(1) 以可视化的方式展示数据在每个医疗保健系统层面的处理过程以及输入和输出;(2) 了解一线工作人员如何看待现有平台上的医疗保健数据共享以及数据对医疗保健服务提供的影响。

方法

研究地点包括博茨瓦纳的 30 个不同医疗保健机构,旨在从多个角度深入了解数据流和系统集成挑战。该研究结合了定性和定量方法,以快速评估流程和资源有限环境下的技术评估模型为指导。研究采用参与式研究方法,从一开始就确保利益相关者的全面参与。调查工具旨在捕捉医疗保健工作者之间数据处理、共享和集成的复杂性。采用目的性抽样策略,以确保不同医疗保健角色和环境的参与者有广泛的代表性。数据收集既使用了数字调查,也使用了深入访谈。初步分析主题包括对医疗保健数据价值的看法以及数据收集和共享方面的经验。已全面获得伦理批准,反映了在整个研究过程中维护研究诚信和参与者福利的承诺。

结果

该研究共招募了近 44 个医疗保健机构,涵盖了各种医疗保健机构。在招募的 44 个机构中,有 27 个机构对调查做出了回应并参加了访谈。共有 75%(112/150)的参与医疗保健专业人员来自诊所,20%(30/150)来自医院,5%(8/150)来自卫生所和流动诊所。截至 2023 年 10 月 10 日,该研究已收集了 200 多份定量调查,并进行了 90 次半结构化访谈。

结论

到目前为止,这项研究得到了医疗保健界的积极参与,这突显了这项研究目标的相关性和必要性。我们相信,以广泛的社区参与为核心的方法对于捕捉医疗保健数据生态系统的细微理解至关重要。现在将重点转移到研究的分析阶段,旨在为改善博茨瓦纳医疗保健系统内的数据流动提出全面建议。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/52411。

相似文献

1
Clinical Data Flow in Botswana Clinics: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Assessment.博茨瓦纳诊所临床数据流程:混合方法评估议定书。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Oct 9;13:e52411. doi: 10.2196/52411.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Qualitative Study定性研究
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Exploring the Pathways of Diabetes Foot Complications Treatment and Investigating Experiences From Frontline Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.探索糖尿病足并发症的治疗途径并调查一线医护人员的经验:一项混合方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Apr 24;13:e54852. doi: 10.2196/54852.
6
Improving the quality of health information: a qualitative assessment of data management and reporting systems in Botswana.提高健康信息质量:博茨瓦纳数据管理和报告系统的定性评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Jan 30;12:7. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-7.
7
Improving the integration of care for trans adults: ICTA a mixed-methods study.改善跨性别成人的护理整合:ICTA 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(28):1-217. doi: 10.3310/EWTA4502.
8
Information needs of Botswana health care workers and perceptions of wikipedia.博茨瓦纳医护人员的信息需求及对维基百科的看法。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Nov;95:8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
9
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10
Assessment of Stakeholder Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Health Data Governance Principles in Botswana: Web-Based Survey.博茨瓦纳利益相关者对健康数据治理原则的认知与态度评估:基于网络的调查
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Mar 13;7:e41408. doi: 10.2196/41408.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards digital justice: participatory action research in global digital health.迈向数字正义:全球数字健康领域的参与式行动研究
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 May;7(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009351.
2
Interoperability opportunities and challenges in linking mhealth applications and eRecord systems: Botswana as an exemplar.连接移动健康应用程序和电子病历系统的互操作性机会和挑战:以博茨瓦纳为例。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Aug 21;21(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01606-7.
3
Solidarity and Community Engagement in Global Health Research.全球健康研究中的团结与社区参与。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(5):43-56. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745930.
4
CareConekta: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of a mobile health intervention to improve engagement in postpartum HIV care in South Africa.CareConekta:一项移动健康干预措施改善南非产后 HIV 护理参与度的随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2020 Mar 12;21(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4190-x.
5
Electronic healthcare records and data quality.电子医疗记录和数据质量。
Health Info Libr J. 2019 Mar;36(1):91-95. doi: 10.1111/hir.12249.
6
Exploring the ethics of global health research priority-setting.探索全球卫生研究重点设定的伦理问题。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Dec 6;19(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0333-y.
7
Community engagement in global health research that advances health equity.社区参与推动健康公平的全球卫生研究。
Bioethics. 2018 Sep;32(7):454-463. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12465. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
8
EHRs: The Challenge of Making Electronic Data Usable and Interoperable.电子健康记录:使电子数据可用且可互操作面临的挑战。
P T. 2017 Sep;42(9):572-575.
9
The Technology Acceptance Model for Resource-Limited Settings (TAM-RLS): A Novel Framework for Mobile Health Interventions Targeted to Low-Literacy End-Users in Resource-Limited Settings.资源有限环境下的技术接受模型(TAM-RLS):针对资源有限环境下低识字率终端用户的移动健康干预的新型框架。
AIDS Behav. 2017 Nov;21(11):3129-3140. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1765-y.
10
Evaluation of a Mobile Health Approach to Tuberculosis Contact Tracing in Botswana.博茨瓦纳结核病接触者追踪移动健康方法的评估
J Health Commun. 2016 Oct;21(10):1115-21. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1222035. Epub 2016 Sep 26.