Richards Justin, Siefken Katja, Pratt Michael, Bauman Adrian, Mejía-Grueso Juliana, Woods Catherine B, Wendel-Vos Wanda, Hinckson Erica, Salvo Deborah, Hallal Pedro C, Ramírez Varela Andrea
Te Hau Kori, Te Herenga Waka, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Institute of Interdisciplinary Exercise Science and Sports Medicine (IIES), MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
J Phys Act Health. 2024 Oct 9;21(12):1412-1422. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2024-0206. Print 2024 Dec 1.
There is limited evidence on the priorities and opportunities associated with promoting population physical activity (PA) participation for the post-COVID-19-pandemic future.
This study assessed government-led PA promotion efforts before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, along with post-COVID-19-pandemic priorities and recommendations.
Two separate cross-sectional surveys conducted in 2023. Survey 1 was targeted at the Global Observatory for Physical Activity (GoPA!) Country Contacts. Survey 2 also included key international informants representing influential stakeholders in PA policy implementation.
There were 68 respondents to Survey 1, collectively representing 61 countries. An additional 37 people, including representatives from 14 key international stakeholders responded to Survey 2. Eighty-two percent of countries had national PA policies. COVID-19 widely disrupted PA policy implementation. Less than 40% of countries integrated PA into their COVID-19 response plan and more than 75% reported policies that restricted PA participation. Although most respondents indicated that government PA priorities did not change due to the COVID-19 pandemic, one in five countries reported that cross-sectoral partnership had become more important during this period. Less than a third of postpandemic governments reported as highly engaged despite the widespread proliferation of PA policies and plans prior to the pandemic. There were variations according to country, region, and income.
Elevating PA promotion on the public health agenda is crucial for the post-COVID-19-pandemic era. At a policy level, it is critical to focus on adequate resourcing, cross-sectoral partnerships, integrated interventions, and inequities in participation. These factors have become increasingly important in the postpandemic PA policy landscape.
关于在新冠疫情后的未来促进人群身体活动(PA)参与的优先事项和机会的证据有限。
本研究评估了新冠疫情之前和期间政府主导的身体活动促进工作,以及新冠疫情后的优先事项和建议。
2023年进行了两项独立的横断面调查。调查1的对象是全球身体活动观察站(GoPA!)的国家联系人。调查2还包括代表身体活动政策实施中有影响力的利益相关者的关键国际信息提供者。
调查1有68名受访者,共代表61个国家。另外37人,包括来自14个关键国际利益相关者的代表,对调查2做出了回应。82%的国家有国家身体活动政策。新冠疫情广泛扰乱了身体活动政策的实施。不到40%的国家将身体活动纳入其新冠疫情应对计划,超过75%的国家报告了限制身体活动参与的政策。尽管大多数受访者表示,政府促进身体活动的优先事项没有因新冠疫情而改变,但五分之一的国家报告称,跨部门伙伴关系在此期间变得更加重要。尽管在疫情之前身体活动政策和计划广泛传播,但不到三分之一的疫情后政府报告称参与度很高。存在国家、地区和收入方面的差异。
在新冠疫情后的时代,将促进身体活动提升到公共卫生议程至关重要。在政策层面,关键是要关注充足的资源、跨部门伙伴关系、综合干预措施以及参与方面的不平等。这些因素在疫情后身体活动政策格局中变得越来越重要。