Kazarian Gregory S, Steinhaus Michael E, Iyer Sravisht, LeBrun Drake, Cecere Robert, Hirase Takashi, Lovecchio Francis, Albert Todd J, Lebl Darren, Huang Darren, Sandhu Harvinder, Rawlins Bernard, Schwab Frank, Lafage Virginie, Kim Han Jo
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Oct 9;18(6):653-9. doi: 10.14444/8653.
Recent studies assessing the importance of various preoperative factors on postoperative outcomes following spine surgery have uncovered several important variables that influence subjective and objective outcomes following cervical spine surgery, but it is still unclear which patients are most likely to benefit from operative management.
The objective of this study was to assess whether preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be used to predict which patients achieve "normal" levels of pain and function after surgery.
This was a prospective cohort study.
This study included all adult patients undergoing cervical spine surgery by 1 of 7 senior spine surgeons at our institution between 2016 and 2018. Of the 164 patients who were eligible for 6-month follow-up at the time that study data were collected, 139 had available follow-up data and were included in our analysis.
Patients completed the Neck Disability Index (NDI) as well as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference computer adaptive tests preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively.
Patients who achieved postoperative patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) for NDI (≤17) and the normative mean (50) for PROMIS were identified. The relationship between preoperative PROMs and the probability of achieving PASS and the normative mean was assessed.
One hundred thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria with diagnoses of myelopathy ( = 36), radiculopathy ( = 48), and myeloradiculopathy ( = 49). For NDI, a 1-point worsening in the preoperative score resulted in an OR of achieving PASS of 0.96 ( < 0.001) in the overall population. This association held true for patients with radiculopathy (OR 0.96; = 0.022) but not myelopathy (OR 0.98; = 0.35). For PROMIS PF, a 1-point improvement in the preoperative score resulted in an OR of achieving the normative mean of 1.10 ( < 0.001). This association held true for patients with radiculopathy (OR 1.14; = 0.033) but did not reach statistical significance for patients with myelopathy (OR 1.03; = 0.515).
Preoperative PROMs can predict postoperative benefit for patients undergoing cervical spine surgery, with worse baseline function associated with a lower likelihood of attaining PASS for NDI and the normative mean for PROMIS PF, especially for patients with radiculopathy.
Baseline symptoms and function, including myelopathy or radiculopathy-dominant symptoms and preoperative PROMs, may predict postoperative outcomes.
近期评估各种术前因素对脊柱手术后预后重要性的研究发现了几个影响颈椎手术后主观和客观预后的重要变量,但仍不清楚哪些患者最有可能从手术治疗中获益。
本研究的目的是评估术前患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)是否可用于预测哪些患者术后能达到“正常”的疼痛和功能水平。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究。
本研究纳入了2016年至2018年间在我们机构由7位资深脊柱外科医生之一进行颈椎手术的所有成年患者。在收集研究数据时符合6个月随访条件的164例患者中,139例有可用的随访数据并纳入我们的分析。
患者在术前和术后6个月完成颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)以及患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)身体功能(PF)和疼痛干扰计算机自适应测试。
确定术后达到NDI患者可接受症状状态(PASS)(≤17)和PROMIS标准均值(50)的患者。评估术前PROMs与达到PASS和标准均值概率之间的关系。
139例患者符合纳入标准,诊断为脊髓病(n = 36)、神经根病(n = 48)和脊髓神经根病(n = 49)。对于NDI,术前评分每恶化1分,总体人群中达到PASS的比值比为0.96(P < 0.001)。这种关联在神经根病患者中成立(比值比0.96;P = 0.022),但在脊髓病患者中不成立(比值比0.98;P = 0.35)。对于PROMIS PF,术前评分每提高1分,达到标准均值的比值比为1.10(P < 0.001)。这种关联在神经根病患者中成立(比值比1.14;P = 0.033),但在脊髓病患者中未达到统计学意义(比值比1.03;P = 0.515)。
术前PROMs可预测颈椎手术患者的术后获益,基线功能越差,达到NDI的PASS和PROMIS PF标准均值的可能性越低,尤其是神经根病患者。
基线症状和功能,包括以脊髓病或神经根病为主的症状以及术前PROMs,可能预测术后结局。