Department of Endocrinology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, 1 Dong Gang West Road, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, China.
The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 9;25(1):797. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07909-w.
Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors appear to benefit bone tissue in antihypertensive treatment. However, the association between RAAS inhibitors and bone metabolism was inconsistent.
Based on the study of Risk Evaluation of Cancers in Chinese Diabetic Individuals(REACTION) conducted in 2011, We followed 6,252 Lanzhou residents aged 40-75 years from 2014 to 2016. Finally, 1,625 hypertension cases with complete data were included in the analysis. The study subjects were divided into four groups according to the type of antihypertensive drugs. We employed logistic or multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the association between different antihypertensive drug use and osteoporosis, the risk of fracture, and the change in bone mineral density (BMD) level. The association of osteoporosis or the fracture risk by cumulative duration of use of these medications (< 3 years.) and (> 3 years.) was also estimated.
The cross-sectional study showed that there was no significant association between baseline antihypertensive drugs (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB)) use and osteoporosis and fracture. During a mean follow-up of 3.4 years in the longitudinal study, there were 478 new osteoporosis cases and 76 fractures. Compared with patients without antihypertensive drug use, the hazard ratios (HRs) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for the risk of osteoporosis were 1.005(0.651,1.552) and 1.077(0.793,1.462) in ACEI or ARB use (p > 0.05). ACEI or ARB use was also not significantly associated with fracture risk (HR 1.102(0.326,3.726), 0.735(0.251,2.148), p > 0.05). Further analysis showed that the use of ACEI (HR 1.078(0.146,7.950)) or ARB (HR 1.169(0.347,3.939)) was not significantly associated with the improvement of osteoporosis (p > 0.05). In addition, the duration of RAAS inhibitors used showed no apparent correlation with the risk of osteoporosis (≤ 3 years: HR 0.872 (0.516, 1.474), > 3 years: HR 1.151 (0.574, 2.308)), nor with the improvement of osteoporosis and the risk of fracture. Meanwhile, the association mentioned above did not change compared to different RAAS inhibitors.
The use of RAAS inhibitors, including ACEIs and ARBs, was not significantly associated with osteoporosis, risk of fracture, or BMD change.
肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)抑制剂在降压治疗中似乎有益于骨骼组织。然而,RAAS 抑制剂与骨代谢之间的关联并不一致。
基于 2011 年开展的中国糖尿病患者癌症风险评估(REACTION)研究,我们于 2014 年至 2016 年对兰州 6252 名 40-75 岁的居民进行随访。最终,纳入了 1625 例高血压病例,这些病例的数据完整。根据降压药物的类型,将研究对象分为四组。我们采用逻辑或多变量 Cox 比例风险回归来估计不同降压药物使用与骨质疏松症、骨折风险和骨密度(BMD)水平变化之间的关系。还估计了这些药物累积使用时间(<3 年和>3 年)与骨质疏松症或骨折风险之间的关联。
横断面研究表明,基线时使用降压药物(血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB))与骨质疏松症和骨折之间无显著关联。在纵向研究的平均 3.4 年随访期间,新发生骨质疏松症病例 478 例,骨折 76 例。与未使用降压药物的患者相比,ACEI 或 ARB 使用的骨质疏松症风险的 HR(95%CI)为 1.005(0.651,1.552)和 1.077(0.793,1.462)(p>0.05)。ACEI 或 ARB 与骨折风险也无显著相关性(HR 1.102(0.326,3.726),0.735(0.251,2.148),p>0.05)。进一步分析表明,ACEI(HR 1.078(0.146,7.950))或 ARB(HR 1.169(0.347,3.939))的使用与骨质疏松症的改善无显著相关性(p>0.05)。此外,RAAS 抑制剂的使用时间与骨质疏松症风险(≤3 年:HR 0.872(0.516,1.474);>3 年:HR 1.151(0.574,2.308))或骨质疏松症和骨折风险的改善均无明显相关性。同时,与不同的 RAAS 抑制剂相比,上述关联没有改变。
RAAS 抑制剂(包括 ACEI 和 ARB)的使用与骨质疏松症、骨折风险或 BMD 变化无显著相关性。