Montón Quesada Isabel, Ogier Augustin C, Ishida Masaki, Takafuji Masafumi, Ito Haruno, Sakuma Hajime, Romanin Ludovica, Roy Christopher W, Prša Milan, Richiardi Jonas, Yerly Jérôme, Stuber Matthias, van Heeswijk Ruud B
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan.
Magn Reson Med. 2025 Mar;93(3):961-974. doi: 10.1002/mrm.30322. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
To compare two blind source separation (BSS) techniques to principal component analysis and the electrocardiogram for the identification of cardiac triggers in self-gated free-running 5D whole-heart MRI. To ascertain the precision and robustness of the techniques, they were compared in three different noise and contrast regimes.
The repeated superior-inferior (SI) projections of a 3D radial trajectory were used to extract the physiological signals in three cardiac MRI cohorts: (1) 9 healthy volunteers without contrast agent injection at 1.5T, (2) 30 ferumoxytol-injected congenital heart disease patients at 1.5T, and (3) 12 gadobutrol-injected patients with suspected coronary artery disease at 3T. Self-gated cardiac triggers were extracted with the three algorithms (principal component analysis [PCA], second-order blind identification [SOBI], and independent component analysis [ICA]) and the difference with the electrocardiogram triggers was calculated. PCA and SOBI triggers were retained for image reconstruction. The image sharpness was ascertained on whole-heart 5D images obtained with PCA and SOBI and compared among the three cohorts.
SOBI resulted in smaller trigger differences in Cohorts 1 and 3 compared to PCA (p < 0.01) and in all cohorts compared to ICA (p < 0.04). In Cohorts 1 and 3, the sharpness increased significantly in the reconstructed images when using SOBI instead of PCA (p < 0.03), but not in Cohort 2 (p = 0.4).
We have shown that SOBI results in more precisely extracted self-gated triggers than PCA and ICA. The validation across three diverse cohorts demonstrates the robustness of the method against acquisition variability.
比较两种盲源分离(BSS)技术与主成分分析以及心电图,用于在自门控自由运行5D全心MRI中识别心脏触发信号。为确定这些技术的精度和稳健性,在三种不同的噪声和对比度条件下对它们进行了比较。
使用三维径向轨迹的重复上下(SI)投影,在三个心脏MRI队列中提取生理信号:(1)9名在1.5T场强下未注射造影剂的健康志愿者,(2)30名在1.5T场强下注射了铁氧还蛋白的先天性心脏病患者,以及(3)12名在3T场强下注射了钆布醇的疑似冠状动脉疾病患者。使用三种算法(主成分分析[PCA]、二阶盲辨识[SOBI]和独立成分分析[ICA])提取自门控心脏触发信号,并计算其与心电图触发信号的差异。保留PCA和SOBI触发信号用于图像重建。在使用PCA和SOBI获得的全心5D图像上确定图像清晰度,并在三个队列之间进行比较。
与PCA相比,SOBI在队列1和队列3中导致的触发信号差异更小(p < 0.01),与ICA相比,在所有队列中差异更小(p < 0.04)。在队列1和队列3中,使用SOBI而非PCA时,重建图像的清晰度显著提高(p < 0.03),但在队列2中未提高(p = 0.4)。
我们已经表明,与PCA和ICA相比,SOBI能更精确地提取自门控触发信号。在三个不同队列中的验证证明了该方法对采集变异性的稳健性。