Salvalaggio Silvia, Gambazza Simone, Andò Martina, Parrotta Ilaria, Burgio Francesca, Danesin Laura, Busan Pierpaolo, Zago Sara, Mantini Dante, D'Imperio Daniela, Zorzi Marco, Filippini Nicola, Turolla Andrea
IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.
Healthcare Professions Department, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Phys Ther. 2025 Feb 6;105(2). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzae148.
People who have survived stroke may have motor and cognitive impairments. High dose of motor rehabilitation was found to provide clinically relevant improvement to upper limb (UL) motor function. Besides, mounting evidence suggests that clinical, neural, and neurophysiological features are associated with spontaneous recovery. However, the association between these features and rehabilitation-induced, rather than spontaneous, recovery has never been fully investigated. The objective was to explore the association between rehabilitation dose and UL motor outcome after stroke, as well as to identify which variables can be considered potential candidate predictors of motor recovery.
People who survived stroke were assessed before and after a period of rehabilitation using motor, cognitive, neuroanatomical, and neurophysiological measures. We investigated the association between dose of rehabilitation and UL response (ie, Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity [FMA-UE]), using ordinary least squares regression as the primary analysis. To obtain unbiased estimates, adjusting covariates were selected using a directed acyclic graph.
Baseline FMA-UE was the only factor associated with motor recovery (b = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.15 points). Attention emerged as a confounder of the association between rehabilitation and final FMA-UE (b = 5.5; 95% CI = -0.8 to 11.9 points), influencing both rehabilitation and UL response.
Preserved attention in people who have survived stroke might lead to greater UL motor recovery, albeit estimates have high levels of variability. Moreover, the increase in the dose of rehabilitation can lead to 5.5 points improvement on the FMA-UE, a nonsignificant but potentially meaningful finding. The approach described here discloses a new framework for investigating the effect of rehabilitation treatment as a potential driver of recovery.
Attentional resources could play a key role in UL motor recovery. There is a potential association between amount of UL recovery and dose of rehabilitation delivered, needing further exploration. Preserved attention and rehabilitation dose are candidate predictors of UL motor recovery.
中风幸存者可能存在运动和认知障碍。研究发现,高剂量的运动康复可使上肢运动功能得到临床相关改善。此外,越来越多的证据表明,临床、神经和神经生理特征与自发恢复有关。然而,这些特征与康复诱导而非自发恢复之间的关联从未得到充分研究。目的是探讨中风后康复剂量与上肢运动结局之间的关联,并确定哪些变量可被视为运动恢复的潜在候选预测因素。
对中风幸存者在一段康复期前后进行运动、认知、神经解剖和神经生理测量评估。我们使用普通最小二乘法回归作为主要分析方法,研究康复剂量与上肢反应(即上肢Fugl-Meyer评估 [FMA-UE])之间的关联。为了获得无偏估计,使用有向无环图选择调整协变量。
基线FMA-UE是与运动恢复相关的唯一因素(b = 0.99;95%可信区间 = 0.83至1.15分)。注意力成为康复与最终FMA-UE之间关联的混杂因素(b = 5.5;95%可信区间 = -0.8至11.9分),对康复和上肢反应均有影响。
中风幸存者保持注意力可能会导致更大程度的上肢运动恢复,尽管估计值的变异性较高。此外,康复剂量的增加可使FMA-UE提高5.5分,这一结果虽无统计学意义,但可能具有潜在意义。此处描述的方法揭示了一个新的框架,用于研究康复治疗作为恢复潜在驱动因素的效果。
注意力资源可能在上肢运动恢复中起关键作用。上肢恢复量与所提供的康复剂量之间可能存在关联,需要进一步探索。保持注意力和康复剂量是上肢运动恢复的候选预测因素。