Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
USC Neurorestoration Center and Department of Neurological Surgery, USC Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA, USA.
Lancet. 2021 Apr 24;397(10284):1545-1553. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00475-X.
BACKGROUND: Long-term loss of arm function after ischaemic stroke is common and might be improved by vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation. We aimed to determine whether this strategy is a safe and effective treatment for improving arm function after stroke. METHODS: In this pivotal, randomised, triple-blind, sham-controlled trial, done in 19 stroke rehabilitation services in the UK and the USA, participants with moderate-to-severe arm weakness, at least 9 months after ischaemic stroke, were randomly assigned (1:1) to either rehabilitation paired with active vagus nerve stimulation (VNS group) or rehabilitation paired with sham stimulation (control group). Randomisation was done by ResearchPoint Global (Austin, TX, USA) using SAS PROC PLAN (SAS Institute Software, Cary, NC, USA), with stratification by region (USA vs UK), age (≤30 years vs >30 years), and baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score (20-35 vs 36-50). Participants, outcomes assessors, and treating therapists were masked to group assignment. All participants were implanted with a vagus nerve stimulation device. The VNS group received 0·8 mA, 100 μs, 30 Hz stimulation pulses, lasting 0·5 s. The control group received 0 mA pulses. Participants received 6 weeks of in-clinic therapy (three times per week; total of 18 sessions) followed by a home exercise programme. The primary outcome was the change in impairment measured by the FMA-UE score on the first day after completion of in-clinic therapy. FMA-UE response rates were also assessed at 90 days after in-clinic therapy (secondary endpoint). All analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03131960. FINDINGS: Between Oct 2, 2017, and Sept 12, 2019, 108 participants were randomly assigned to treatment (53 to the VNS group and 55 to the control group). 106 completed the study (one patient for each group did not complete the study). On the first day after completion of in-clinic therapy, the mean FMA-UE score increased by 5·0 points (SD 4·4) in the VNS group and by 2·4 points (3·8) in the control group (between group difference 2·6, 95% CI 1·0-4·2, p=0·0014). 90 days after in-clinic therapy, a clinically meaningful response on the FMA-UE score was achieved in 23 (47%) of 53 patients in the VNS group versus 13 (24%) of 55 patients in the control group (between group difference 24%, 6-41; p=0·0098). There was one serious adverse event related to surgery (vocal cord paresis) in the control group. INTERPRETATION: Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation is a novel potential treatment option for people with long-term moderate-to-severe arm impairment after ischaemic stroke. FUNDING: MicroTransponder.
背景:缺血性中风后手臂功能长期丧失较为常见,而通过迷走神经刺激与康复治疗相结合可能会改善这一状况。我们旨在确定这种策略是否是改善中风后手臂功能的安全有效的治疗方法。
方法:在这项在英国和美国的 19 个中风康复服务机构进行的关键、随机、三盲、假刺激对照试验中,选取手臂中度至重度无力且中风后至少 9 个月的患者,按照 1:1 的比例随机分配到康复结合主动迷走神经刺激(VNS 组)或康复结合假刺激(对照组)。采用 ResearchPoint Global(美国德克萨斯州奥斯汀)的 SAS PROC PLAN(SAS Institute Software,美国北卡罗来纳州卡里),按地区(美国与英国)、年龄(≤30 岁与>30 岁)和基线 Fugl-Meyer 上肢评估(FMA-UE)评分(20-35 与 36-50)进行分层,进行随机分组。参与者、结果评估者和治疗治疗师对分组情况均设盲。所有参与者均植入迷走神经刺激装置。VNS 组接受 0.8 mA、100 μs、30 Hz 刺激脉冲,持续 0.5 s。对照组接受 0 mA 脉冲。参与者接受 6 周的门诊治疗(每周 3 次;共 18 次),随后进行家庭锻炼计划。主要结局是在门诊治疗结束后的第一天通过 FMA-UE 评分衡量的损伤变化。FMA-UE 反应率也在门诊治疗后 90 天进行评估(次要终点)。所有分析均基于意向治疗。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT03131960。
结果:在 2017 年 10 月 2 日至 2019 年 9 月 12 日期间,108 名参与者被随机分配到治疗组(53 名接受 VNS 治疗,55 名接受对照组治疗)。106 名患者完成了研究(每组各有 1 名患者未完成研究)。在门诊治疗结束后的第一天,VNS 组的 FMA-UE 评分平均增加 5.0 分(4.4 分),对照组增加 2.4 分(3.8 分)(组间差异 2.6,95%CI 1.0-4.2,p=0.0014)。门诊治疗后 90 天,VNS 组 53 名患者中有 23 名(47%)在 FMA-UE 评分上达到了有临床意义的反应,而对照组 55 名患者中有 13 名(24%)(组间差异 24%,6-41;p=0.0098)。对照组有 1 例与手术相关的严重不良事件(声带麻痹)。
解释:迷走神经刺激与康复相结合是一种治疗缺血性中风后长期中度至重度手臂功能障碍的新的潜在治疗选择。
资金来源:MicroTransponder。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024-9
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020-7
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2024-8
Commun Med (Lond). 2025-8-20
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025-7-9
Front Neurol. 2025-7-8
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025-6-23
Transl Stroke Res. 2021-2
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020-7
Lancet Neurol. 2020-1-28
Front Neurosci. 2019-3-29